Radeon RX 6800 XT Windows vs. Ubuntu Linux

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with Radeon RX 6800 XT on Windows vs. Linux. Benchmarks by Michael Larabel for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2012084-HA-SIENNA60183
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Desktop Graphics 4 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
OpenGL Demos Test Suite 2 Tests
Unigine Test Suite 2 Tests
Vulkan Compute 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Windows 10
December 01 2020
  4 Hours
Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0
December 05 2020
  3 Hours, 20 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  3 Hours, 40 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Radeon RX 6800 XT Windows vs. Ubuntu LinuxProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkChipsetAudioMonitorOSKernelDisplay DriverOpenCLFile-SystemScreen ResolutionDesktopDisplay ServerOpenGLVulkanCompilerWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core @ 3.70GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads)ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (2702 BIOS)2 x 8192 MB 3600MHz F4-3600C16-8GTRG932GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TBAMD Radeon RX 6800 XTIntel I211 Gigabit ConnectionMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro Build 1904210.0 (x86_64)27.20.14501.24001OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (3188.4)NTFS3840x2160AMD Starship/Matisse16GB1000GB Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1TBAMD SIENNA_CICHLID 16GB (2575/1000MHz)AMD Device ab28ASUS VP28URealtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211Ubuntu 20.105.10.0-051000rc6daily20201205-generic (x86_64) 20201204GNOME Shell 3.38.1X Server 1.20.9modesetting 1.20.94.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-bb46a01 2020-12-05 groovy-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0)1.2.145GCC 10.2.0ext4OpenBenchmarking.orgPython Details- Windows 10: Python 3.7.1- Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0: Python 3.8.6Security Details- Windows 10: __user pointer sanitization: Disabled + Retpoline: Full + IBPB: Always + IBRS: Enabled + STIBP: Enabled- Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: always-on RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected Compiler Details- Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0: --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-10-JvwpWM/gcc-10-10.2.0/debian/tmp-gcn/usr,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v Processor Details- Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq schedutil (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xa201009

Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+12%+12%+24%+24%+36%+36%47.9%38.1%36.4%35.3%21.7%13.7%13.7%13.3%12.5%10.2%8.4%5.6%5.1%4.6%3.7%3.6%2.3%3840 x 2160 - Ultimate3840 x 2160 - Low3840 x 2160 - Ultra3840 x 2160 - HighPlot3D - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen34.7%2x - 3 - Yes26.6%GPU Vulkan22.5%GiMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen4x - No21.2%Food20.5%4x - Yes13.8%Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 21601920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - OpenGL1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGL11.6%TessMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - OpenGLGPU OpenCL6.1%3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - OpenGLDLSCFurmark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - OpenGLPixmark Piano - 3840 x 2160 - FullscreenOpenCL GPU - SupercarXonoticXonoticXonoticXonoticGpuTestWaifu2x-NCNN VulkanGeekbenchGpuTestRealSR-NCNNLuxCoreRender OpenCLRealSR-NCNNParaViewParaViewUnigine HeavenUnigine ValleyUnigine ValleyGpuTestUnigine HeavenGeekbenchUnigine HeavenLuxCoreRender OpenCLGpuTestUnigine ValleyGpuTestIndigoBenchWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0

Radeon RX 6800 XT Windows vs. Ubuntu Linuxrealsr-ncnn: 4x - Norealsr-ncnn: 4x - Yeswaifu2x-ncnn: 2x - 3 - Yesunigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - D3D11unigine-heaven: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - D3D11unigine-heaven: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - D3D11unigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-heaven: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-heaven: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - D3D11unigine-valley: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - D3D11unigine-valley: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - D3D11unigine-valley: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-valley: 2560 x 1440 - Fullscreen - OpenGLunigine-valley: 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen - OpenGLxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Lowxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimateparaview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160luxcorerender-cl: DLSCluxcorerender-cl: Foodluxcorerender-cl: LuxCore Benchmarkluxcorerender-cl: Rainbow Colors and Prismgputest: GiMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Plot3D - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Furmark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: TessMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Piano - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreengputest: Pixmark Volplosion - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreenindigobench: OpenCL GPU - Bedroomindigobench: OpenCL GPU - Supercargeekbench: GPU OpenCLgeekbench: GPU VulkanWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.04.73927.0942.757310.911225.067103.212248.311191.76889.2678202.594203.663123.423212.368185.79497.3891473.5837913393.7494392345.9279265276.1914232124.3812470.233285.344565.397297.533100.6226.713.586.9315.41159451612138496277291622414214.44630.186160782835905.74430.8413.491281.275207.88494.2883190.318192.729109.536654.2276744532.7073519471.7278829408.4298260324.295188.697298.613111.8937.052.97194131196438889305501681410414.57030.89115149568246OpenBenchmarking.org

RealSR-NCNN

RealSR-NCNN is an NCNN neural network implementation of the RealSR project and accelerated using the Vulkan API. RealSR is the Real-World Super Resolution via Kernel Estimation and Noise Injection. NCNN is a high performance neural network inference framework optimized for mobile and other platforms developed by Tencent. This test profile times how long it takes to increase the resolution of a sample image by a scale of 4x with Vulkan. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRealSR-NCNN 20200818Scale: 4x - TAA: NoWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.01.29242.58483.87725.16966.462SE +/- 0.122, N = 15SE +/- 0.038, N = 34.7395.744
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRealSR-NCNN 20200818Scale: 4x - TAA: NoWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0246810Min: 4.6 / Avg: 4.74 / Max: 6.45Min: 5.7 / Avg: 5.74 / Max: 5.82

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRealSR-NCNN 20200818Scale: 4x - TAA: YesWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0714212835SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 327.0930.84
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRealSR-NCNN 20200818Scale: 4x - TAA: YesWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0714212835Min: 27.09 / Avg: 27.09 / Max: 27.11Min: 30.68 / Avg: 30.84 / Max: 30.95

Waifu2x-NCNN Vulkan

Waifu2x-NCNN is an NCNN neural network implementation of the Waifu2x converter project and accelerated using the Vulkan API. NCNN is a high performance neural network inference framework optimized for mobile and other platforms developed by Tencent. This test profile times how long it takes to increase the resolution of a sample image with Vulkan. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWaifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: YesWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.00.78551.5712.35653.1423.9275SE +/- 0.009, N = 3SE +/- 0.013, N = 32.7573.491
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWaifu2x-NCNN Vulkan 20200818Scale: 2x - Denoise: 3 - TAA: YesWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0246810Min: 2.75 / Avg: 2.76 / Max: 2.78Min: 3.47 / Avg: 3.49 / Max: 3.52

Unigine Heaven

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Heaven demo for the Unigine engine. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11Windows 1070140210280350SE +/- 0.13, N = 3310.91

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11Windows 1050100150200250SE +/- 0.20, N = 3225.07

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11Windows 1020406080100SE +/- 0.05, N = 3103.21

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.060120180240300SE +/- 1.78, N = 3SE +/- 1.07, N = 3248.31281.28
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.050100150200250Min: 244.76 / Avg: 248.31 / Max: 250.13Min: 280.14 / Avg: 281.27 / Max: 283.42

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.050100150200250SE +/- 0.53, N = 3SE +/- 1.20, N = 3191.77207.88
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.04080120160200Min: 191.03 / Avg: 191.77 / Max: 192.78Min: 205.49 / Avg: 207.88 / Max: 209.22

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.020406080100SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 389.2794.29
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.020406080100Min: 89.23 / Avg: 89.27 / Max: 89.3Min: 94.24 / Avg: 94.29 / Max: 94.37

Unigine Valley

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Valley demo for the Unigine engine, released in February 2013. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Unigine Valley relies upon an OpenGL 3 core profile context. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11Windows 104080120160200SE +/- 0.77, N = 3202.59

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11Windows 104080120160200SE +/- 0.74, N = 3203.66

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: D3D11Windows 10306090120150SE +/- 0.04, N = 3123.42

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.050100150200250SE +/- 0.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3212.37190.32
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.04080120160200Min: 210.6 / Avg: 212.37 / Max: 213.97Min: 189.72 / Avg: 190.32 / Max: 190.91

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.04080120160200SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 1.62, N = 3185.79192.73
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.04080120160200Min: 185.57 / Avg: 185.79 / Max: 185.92Min: 189.55 / Avg: 192.73 / Max: 194.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.020406080100SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 397.39109.54
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Valley 1.0Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.020406080100Min: 97.29 / Avg: 97.39 / Max: 97.47Min: 109.41 / Avg: 109.54 / Max: 109.65

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0140280420560700SE +/- 0.96, N = 3SE +/- 4.32, N = 3473.58654.23MIN: 169 / MAX: 886MIN: 418 / MAX: 1382
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0120240360480600Min: 471.77 / Avg: 473.58 / Max: 475.05Min: 646 / Avg: 654.23 / Max: 660.61

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0120240360480600SE +/- 1.28, N = 3SE +/- 7.98, N = 3393.75532.71MIN: 162 / MAX: 732MIN: 262 / MAX: 1131
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.090180270360450Min: 391.23 / Avg: 393.75 / Max: 395.4Min: 522.44 / Avg: 532.71 / Max: 548.41

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0100200300400500SE +/- 1.78, N = 3SE +/- 4.70, N = 3345.93471.73MIN: 146 / MAX: 652MIN: 227 / MAX: 957
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.080160240320400Min: 342.38 / Avg: 345.93 / Max: 347.92Min: 462.74 / Avg: 471.73 / Max: 478.61

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.090180270360450SE +/- 1.30, N = 3SE +/- 2.50, N = 3276.19408.43MIN: 24 / MAX: 588MIN: 63 / MAX: 961
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.070140210280350Min: 274.57 / Avg: 276.19 / Max: 278.77Min: 403.99 / Avg: 408.43 / Max: 412.62

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10306090120150SE +/- 1.35, N = 15124.38

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 103K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 135.70, N = 1512470.23

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.070140210280350SE +/- 9.10, N = 15SE +/- 4.00, N = 15285.34324.29
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.060120180240300Min: 232 / Avg: 285.34 / Max: 311.83Min: 297.41 / Avg: 324.29 / Max: 357.99

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.011002200330044005500SE +/- 145.58, N = 15SE +/- 64.02, N = 154565.405188.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.09001800270036004500Min: 3712 / Avg: 4565.4 / Max: 4989.25Min: 4758.54 / Avg: 5188.7 / Max: 5727.9

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.070140210280350SE +/- 5.28, N = 15SE +/- 3.96, N = 15297.53298.61
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.050100150200250Min: 263.64 / Avg: 297.53 / Max: 311.83Min: 275.72 / Avg: 298.61 / Max: 313.83

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.07001400210028003500SE +/- 55.03, N = 15SE +/- 41.27, N = 153100.623111.89
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.05001000150020002500Min: 2747.41 / Avg: 3100.62 / Max: 3249.62Min: 2873.34 / Avg: 3111.89 / Max: 3270.48

LuxCoreRender OpenCL

LuxCoreRender is an open-source physically based renderer. This test profile is focused on running LuxCoreRender on OpenCL accelerators/GPUs. The alternative luxcorerender test profile is for CPU execution due to a difference in tests, etc. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3Scene: DLSCWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0246810SE +/- 0.49, N = 12SE +/- 0.46, N = 126.717.05MIN: 0.52 / MAX: 7.32MIN: 0.43 / MAX: 7.67
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3Scene: DLSCWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.03691215Min: 1.36 / Avg: 6.71 / Max: 7.24Min: 1.96 / Avg: 7.05 / Max: 7.54

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3Scene: FoodWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.00.80551.6112.41653.2224.0275SE +/- 0.26, N = 12SE +/- 0.28, N = 93.582.97MIN: 0.16 / MAX: 4.02MIN: 0.06 / MAX: 4.11
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3Scene: FoodWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0246810Min: 0.68 / Avg: 3.58 / Max: 3.9Min: 0.78 / Avg: 2.97 / Max: 3.39

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3Scene: LuxCore BenchmarkWindows 10246810SE +/- 0.53, N = 126.93MIN: 0.24 / MAX: 7.68

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/sec, More Is BetterLuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3Scene: Rainbow Colors and PrismWindows 1048121620SE +/- 1.03, N = 1215.41MIN: 1.94 / MAX: 20.92

GpuTest

GpuTest is a cross-platform OpenGL benchmark developed at Geeks3D.com that offers tech demos such as FurMark, TessMark, and other workloads to stress various areas of GPUs and drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.04K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 44.90, N = 3SE +/- 69.99, N = 31594519413
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.03K6K9K12K15KMin: 15892 / Avg: 15944.67 / Max: 16034Min: 19317 / Avg: 19412.67 / Max: 19549

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.030K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 28.88, N = 3SE +/- 75.90, N = 3161213119643
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.030K60K90K120K150KMin: 161168 / Avg: 161213.33 / Max: 161267Min: 119503 / Avg: 119642.67 / Max: 119764

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.02K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 21.78, N = 3SE +/- 6.77, N = 384968889
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.015003000450060007500Min: 8465 / Avg: 8496 / Max: 8538Min: 8876 / Avg: 8889.33 / Max: 8898

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.07K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 22.52, N = 3SE +/- 1.86, N = 32772930550
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.05K10K15K20K25KMin: 27690 / Avg: 27728.67 / Max: 27768Min: 30546 / Avg: 30549.67 / Max: 30552

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0400800120016002000SE +/- 2.73, N = 3SE +/- 2.19, N = 316221681
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.030060090012001500Min: 1617 / Avg: 1622.33 / Max: 1626Min: 1677 / Avg: 1681.33 / Max: 1684

OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.09001800270036004500SE +/- 4.06, N = 3SE +/- 1.20, N = 341424104
OpenBenchmarking.orgPoints, More Is BetterGpuTest 0.7.0Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.07001400210028003500Min: 4135 / Avg: 4142.33 / Max: 4149Min: 4102 / Avg: 4103.67 / Max: 4106

IndigoBench

This is a test of Indigo Renderer's IndigoBench benchmark. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.4Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: BedroomWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.048121620SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 314.4514.57
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.4Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: BedroomWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.048121620Min: 14.43 / Avg: 14.45 / Max: 14.47Min: 14.54 / Avg: 14.57 / Max: 14.59

OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.4Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: SupercarWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0714212835SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 330.1930.89
OpenBenchmarking.orgM samples/s, More Is BetterIndigoBench 4.4Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: SupercarWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.0714212835Min: 30.18 / Avg: 30.19 / Max: 30.19Min: 30.82 / Avg: 30.89 / Max: 30.97

Geekbench

This is a benchmark of Geekbench 5 Pro. The test profile automates the execution of Geekbench 5 under the Phoronix Test Suite, assuming you have a valid license key for Geekbench 5 Pro. This test will not work without a valid license key for Geekbench Pro. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5Test: GPU OpenCLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.030K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 780.16, N = 3SE +/- 2282.49, N = 3160782151495
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5Test: GPU OpenCLWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.030K60K90K120K150KMin: 159845 / Avg: 160782 / Max: 162331Min: 147271 / Avg: 151495.33 / Max: 155106

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5Test: GPU VulkanWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.020K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 874.79, N = 8SE +/- 772.23, N = 38359068246
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterGeekbench 5Test: GPU VulkanWindows 10Ubuntu 20.10 + Linux 5.9 + Mesa 21.014K28K42K56K70KMin: 78578 / Avg: 83590.13 / Max: 86083Min: 67210 / Avg: 68246 / Max: 69756