AMD EPYC 7601 2P Tests for a future article. 1: Processor: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 63.06 |==================================================================== 2 . 62.54 |=================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.7 |====================================================================== 2 . 6.7 |====================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 1048.70 |================================================================== 2 . 1044.66 |================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.1 |===================================================================== 2 . 10.0 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 701.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 705.52 |=================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.1 |===================================================================== 2 . 10.0 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 698.60 |================================================================== 2 . 709.72 |=================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 63.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 64.63 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 106.99 |=================================================================== 2 . 107.19 |=================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 622.23 |================================================================== 2 . 631.81 |=================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.2 |===================================================================== 2 . 10.2 |===================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 694.98 |=================================================================== 2 . 695.18 |=================================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 348742 |=================================================================== 2 . 335246 |================================================================ Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.449 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.489 |==================================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.65 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.08 |================================================================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 19.40 |=================================================================== 2 . 19.64 |==================================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.53 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.11 |=================================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 67.54 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.89 |=================================================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 47.63 |==================================================================== 2 . 47.53 |==================================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 97.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 99.19 |==================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 603 |======================================================== 2 . 752 |====================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 616 |========================================================== 2 . 747 |====================================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Random Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 116500 |=================================================================== 2 . 113018 |================================================================= Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 23.35 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.29 |==================================================================== FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 79402.44 |============================================================ 2 . 85377.77 |================================================================= Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 199.07 |=================================================================== 2 . 200.07 |=================================================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.96 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.88 |==================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.39 |================================================================ 2 . 14.16 |==================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 13.47 |================================================================ 2 . 14.24 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Default Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.110 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.124 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100 Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.203 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.209 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 24.41 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.34 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.11 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.14 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 51.03 |==================================================================== 2 . 50.19 |=================================================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 31054170.8 |=============================================================== 2 . 30748131.4 |============================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7150.67 |================================================================== 2 . 6859.42 |=============================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7950.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 7971.5 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 36.60 |==================================================================== 2 . 36.82 |==================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7414.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 7384.6 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 35.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 35.63 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7428.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 7440.5 |=================================================================== LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.67 |=================================================================== 2 . 23.87 |==================================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5680455 |================================================================== 2 . 5687436 |================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.38 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.31 |==================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20.11 |==================================================================== 2 . 19.98 |==================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 24.21 |=================================================================== 2 . 24.47 |==================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.28 |=================================================================== 2 . 22.63 |==================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.77 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.58 |=================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20.77 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.89 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.12 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.11 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.27 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.29 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.52 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.49 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.02 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.04 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 17.60 |==================================================================== 2 . 17.62 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 28.89 |==================================================================== 2 . 28.92 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 43.23 |==================================================================== 2 . 43.29 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 79.14 |==================================================================== 2 . 78.98 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.243 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.243 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.737 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.733 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.981 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.984 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.208 |==================================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.08 |==================================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 33.13 |==================================================================== Stockfish 12 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 42632276 |================================================================= asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 1 . 61592327 |================================================================= Timed Clash Compilation Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 620.84 |=================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 249.53 |=================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 40.09 |==================================================================== RNNoise 2020-06-28 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.79 |==================================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 184.26 |=================================================================== KeyDB 6.0.16 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 264990.18 |================================================================ GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.030 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 17374 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.058 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2617 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.382 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 429497 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.117 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2360 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.20 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 14492 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.069 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2291 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.437 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 380045 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.132 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 31843 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.571 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Fast Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.90 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.35 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.17 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 92.10 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 63.53 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.855 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.42 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 32.69 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 831.82 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1576478.58 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1162742.42 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 889153.70 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1396994.71 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1033603.52 |=============================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 107071 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 213239 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1059057 |================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 269964 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 536758 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2658680 |================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 40.55 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 43.73 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.66 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.04 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.14 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.21 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.53 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.15 |===================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 56.13 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 103.92 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 49.72 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 34.52 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 64.33 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 61.66 |==================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 368.41 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 341.17 |=================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Face Detection 0106 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.15 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Face Detection 0106 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5041.57 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Face Detection 0106 FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.16 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Face Detection 0106 FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5038.66 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Person Detection 0106 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.08 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Person Detection 0106 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7579.14 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Person Detection 0106 FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.07 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Person Detection 0106 FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7593.74 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 7453.00 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP16 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.11 |===================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP32 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 7688.94 |================================================================== OpenVINO 2021.1 Model: Age Gender Recognition Retail 0013 FP32 - Device: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.05 |===================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.042 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.583 |==================================================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better 1 . 264552963.56 |============================================================= AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 1145 |===================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 884 |====================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 2029 |===================================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 445510 |=================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 92.65 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 72.21 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.94 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.02 |===================================================================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.951 |==================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better 1 . 236961 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 342894 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 145052 |=================================================================== OpenCV 4.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 15713 |====================================================================