EPYC 7502 Ubuntu 20.10

AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2011286-HA-EPYC7502U76
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Chess Test Suite 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 4 Tests
CPU Massive 11 Tests
Creator Workloads 6 Tests
Fortran Tests 3 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 5 Tests
MPI Benchmarks 3 Tests
Multi-Core 6 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 3 Tests
Scientific Computing 3 Tests
Server 2 Tests
Server CPU Tests 5 Tests
Single-Threaded 4 Tests
Texture Compression 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
1
November 27 2020
  4 Hours, 37 Minutes
2
November 28 2020
  4 Hours, 22 Minutes
3
November 28 2020
  4 Hours, 23 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 27 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

EPYC 7502 Ubuntu 20.10 AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.319 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.316 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.317 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.939 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.931 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.934 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.254 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.241 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.248 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.699 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.681 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.687 |==================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.08310 |================================================================= 2 . 8.57863 |======================================================= 3 . 8.61834 |======================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.75500 |================================================================== 2 . 2.70330 |================================================================= 3 . 2.72091 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.12322 |================================================================== 2 . 2.10604 |================================================================= 3 . 2.12362 |================================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.70 |========================================================= 3 . 13.05 |========================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 129.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 128.04 |================================================================== 3 . 128.01 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 16.88 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 16.85 |==================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 29.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.61 |========================================================= 3 . 25.26 |=========================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.03066 |================================================================== 2 . 0.03041 |================================================================= 3 . 0.03046 |================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.338 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.351 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.371 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.54 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.55 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.60 |==================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8933.00 |================================================= 2 . 10853.64 |============================================================ 3 . 11745.09 |================================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9485.52 |================================================================== 2 . 9474.88 |================================================================== 3 . 9516.51 |================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10969.7 |================================================================= 2 . 10943.6 |================================================================= 3 . 11092.9 |================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 45.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 45.51 |=================================================================== 3 . 45.23 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10248.1 |================================================================== 2 . 10249.2 |================================================================== 3 . 10131.9 |================================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 44.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 45.07 |==================================================================== 3 . 44.67 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10279.1 |================================================================== 2 . 10244.7 |================================================================== 3 . 10193.2 |================================================================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6743280 |================================================================== 2 . 6716153 |================================================================== 3 . 6719350 |================================================================== Stockfish 12 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 59508694 |============================================================== 2 . 59967078 |=============================================================== 3 . 62203405 |================================================================= asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 1 . 77419217 |================================================================= 2 . 76320957 |================================================================ 3 . 76128440 |================================================================ LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.53 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.67 |============================================================ 3 . 13.56 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2060460.94 |=============================================================== 2 . 1231139.82 |====================================== 3 . 1587014.13 |================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1547127.57 |=============================================================== 2 . 1532225.05 |============================================================== 3 . 1554385.46 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1174620.57 |============================================================ 2 . 1139195.67 |=========================================================== 3 . 1226154.44 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1877683.87 |=============================================================== 2 . 1711240.11 |========================================================= 3 . 1695718.20 |========================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1340989.04 |============================================================= 2 . 1376800.91 |=============================================================== 3 . 1350949.64 |============================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 296.25 |================================================================== 2 . 299.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 299.96 |=================================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 516931 |=================================================================== 2 . 515230 |================================================================== 3 . 519240 |=================================================================== Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 176.95 |=================================================================== 2 . 177.91 |=================================================================== 3 . 177.73 |=================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 35.97 |=================================================================== 2 . 36.31 |==================================================================== 3 . 36.20 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.61 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.60 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.61 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 73.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 73.17 |==================================================================== 3 . 73.22 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 53.56 |==================================================================== 2 . 53.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 53.45 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.324 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.225 |=================================================================== 3 . 8.243 |=================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.63 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.54 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.53 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.77 |==================================================================== 2 . 25.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.65 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 765.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 766.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 765.13 |=================================================================== Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.799 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.213 |============================================================ 3 . 4.275 |============================================================= Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.671 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.662 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.656 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.090 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.086 |================================================================= 3 . 0.086 |================================================================= Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.064 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.060 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.068 |==================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.46075 |================================================================== 2 . 1.43676 |================================================================= 3 . 1.45287 |==================================================================