EPYC 7502 Ubuntu 20.10 AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core testing with a ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD EPYC 7502 32-Core @ 2.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: ASRockRack EPYCD8 (P2.10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: AMD Starship/Matisse, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-29-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.70 |========================================================= 3 . 13.05 |========================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 129.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 128.04 |================================================================== 3 . 128.01 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 16.88 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 16.85 |==================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 29.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.61 |========================================================= 3 . 25.26 |=========================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.08310 |================================================================= 2 . 8.57863 |======================================================= 3 . 8.61834 |======================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.75500 |================================================================== 2 . 2.70330 |================================================================= 3 . 2.72091 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.03066 |================================================================== 2 . 0.03041 |================================================================= 3 . 0.03046 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.46075 |================================================================== 2 . 1.43676 |================================================================= 3 . 1.45287 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.12322 |================================================================== 2 . 2.10604 |================================================================= 3 . 2.12362 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8933.00 |================================================= 2 . 10853.64 |============================================================ 3 . 11745.09 |================================================================= Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 176.95 |=================================================================== 2 . 177.91 |=================================================================== 3 . 177.73 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.53 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.67 |============================================================ 3 . 13.56 |=========================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9485.52 |================================================================== 2 . 9474.88 |================================================================== 3 . 9516.51 |================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10969.7 |================================================================= 2 . 10943.6 |================================================================= 3 . 11092.9 |================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 45.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 45.51 |=================================================================== 3 . 45.23 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10248.1 |================================================================== 2 . 10249.2 |================================================================== 3 . 10131.9 |================================================================= LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 44.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 45.07 |==================================================================== 3 . 44.67 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10279.1 |================================================================== 2 . 10244.7 |================================================================== 3 . 10193.2 |================================================================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6743280 |================================================================== 2 . 6716153 |================================================================== 3 . 6719350 |================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.319 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.316 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.317 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.939 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.931 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.934 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.254 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.241 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.248 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.699 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.681 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.687 |==================================================================== Stockfish 12 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 59508694 |============================================================== 2 . 59967078 |=============================================================== 3 . 62203405 |================================================================= asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 1 . 77419217 |================================================================= 2 . 76320957 |================================================================ 3 . 76128440 |================================================================ Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 296.25 |================================================================== 2 . 299.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 299.96 |=================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 35.97 |=================================================================== 2 . 36.31 |==================================================================== 3 . 36.20 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.61 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.60 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.61 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 73.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 73.17 |==================================================================== 3 . 73.22 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 53.56 |==================================================================== 2 . 53.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 53.45 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.324 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.225 |=================================================================== 3 . 8.243 |=================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.63 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.54 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.53 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.77 |==================================================================== 2 . 25.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.65 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 765.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 766.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 765.13 |=================================================================== Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.799 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.213 |============================================================ 3 . 4.275 |============================================================= Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.671 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.662 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.656 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.090 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.086 |================================================================= 3 . 0.086 |================================================================= Darktable 3.2.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.064 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.060 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.068 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2060460.94 |=============================================================== 2 . 1231139.82 |====================================== 3 . 1587014.13 |================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1547127.57 |=============================================================== 2 . 1532225.05 |============================================================== 3 . 1554385.46 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1174620.57 |============================================================ 2 . 1139195.67 |=========================================================== 3 . 1226154.44 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1877683.87 |=============================================================== 2 . 1711240.11 |========================================================= 3 . 1695718.20 |========================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1340989.04 |============================================================= 2 . 1376800.91 |=============================================================== 3 . 1350949.64 |============================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.338 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.351 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.371 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11.54 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.55 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.60 |==================================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 516931 |=================================================================== 2 . 515230 |================================================================== 3 . 519240 |===================================================================