xeon E Thurs Intel Xeon E-2288G testing with a Compulab SBC-ATCFL v1.2 (ATOP3.PRD.0.29.2 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2288G @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Compulab SBC-ATCFL v1.2 (ATOP3.PRD.0.29.2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-2667MT/s Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB, Audio: Intel Cannon Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.1.96, Vulkan: 1.2.142, Compiler: GCC 11.0.0 20201119, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2288G @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Compulab SBC-ATCFL v1.2 (ATOP3.PRD.0.29.2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-2667MT/s Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB, Audio: Intel Cannon Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.1.96, Vulkan: 1.2.142, Compiler: GCC 11.0.0 20201119, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E-2288G @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Compulab SBC-ATCFL v1.2 (ATOP3.PRD.0.29.2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 32 GB DDR4-2667MT/s Samsung M378A4G43MB1-CTD, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 8GB, Audio: Intel Cannon Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-26-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.1.96, Vulkan: 1.2.142, Compiler: GCC 11.0.0 20201119, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 122.82 |================================================================== 2 . 123.72 |=================================================================== 3 . 124.23 |=================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.08216 |================================================================== 2 . 5.08106 |================================================================== 3 . 5.08034 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 26.00 |================================================================= 2 . 27.07 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.77 |=================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.68364 |================================================================== 2 . 2.68131 |================================================================== 3 . 2.68343 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.04252 |================================================================== 2 . 3.04441 |================================================================== 3 . 3.04309 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.03739 |================================================================= 2 . 0.03721 |================================================================= 3 . 0.03769 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.28161 |================================================================== 2 . 0.27798 |================================================================= 3 . 0.28049 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.74146 |================================================================== 2 . 1.72610 |================================================================= 3 . 1.70136 |================================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17717.01 |================================================================= 2 . 17283.70 |=============================================================== 3 . 17143.03 |=============================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9742414 |================================================================== 2 . 9738297 |================================================================== 3 . 9791573 |================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.441 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.446 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.434 |================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.298 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.298 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.284 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.725 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.724 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.718 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.717 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.741 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.762 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Fast Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.65 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.66 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.65 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.47 |================================================================== 2 . 8.59 |=================================================================== 3 . 8.84 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 32.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 33.16 |==================================================================== 3 . 33.28 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 273.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 274.08 |=================================================================== 3 . 274.52 |===================================================================