8280 Xeon Platinum Nov 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 testing with a GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.7, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.2 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.7, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.2 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPED1D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-18-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.7, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.2 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 yquake2 7.45 Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 26.1 |=============================================================== 2 . 25.9 |============================================================== 3 . 28.8 |===================================================================== Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 223.28 |=================================================================== 2 . 223.66 |=================================================================== 3 . 223.23 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5099.47 |================================================================== 2 . 4965.52 |================================================================ 3 . 5072.31 |================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6130.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 6028.6 |================================================================== 3 . 6148.1 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 47.35 |==================================================================== 2 . 47.23 |==================================================================== 3 . 47.33 |==================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6367.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 5965.6 |=============================================================== 3 . 5937.5 |============================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 46.14 |==================================================================== 2 . 46.12 |==================================================================== 3 . 46.19 |==================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6170.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 6055.5 |================================================================== 3 . 5972.5 |================================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 59.56 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.69 |=================================================================== 3 . 58.98 |=================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 70.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 69.04 |================================================================== 3 . 70.79 |==================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 333.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 316.44 |================================================================ 3 . 327.34 |================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 33.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 33.87 |==================================================================== 3 . 33.71 |==================================================================== GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.696 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.724 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.701 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2205521.09 |=============================================================== 2 . 1450020.38 |========================================= 3 . 1513018.71 |=========================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1822917.91 |=============================================================== 2 . 1818704.39 |=============================================================== 3 . 1709246.12 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1410639.85 |=============================================================== 2 . 1419912.40 |=============================================================== 3 . 1334466.00 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2035268.34 |=============================================================== 2 . 1987224.01 |============================================================== 3 . 2015142.14 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1579103.33 |============================================================== 2 . 1610752.53 |=============================================================== 3 . 1613480.67 |=============================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.362 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.352 |==================================================================== 3 . 8.281 |=================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 19.95 |==================================================================== 2 . 19.75 |=================================================================== 3 . 19.70 |=================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 1845 |===================================================================== 2 . 1805 |==================================================================== 3 . 1807 |==================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 1094 |===================================================================== 2 . 1073 |==================================================================== 3 . 1093 |===================================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 2939 |===================================================================== 2 . 2878 |==================================================================== 3 . 2900 |==================================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 36540 |=================================================================== 2 . 36897 |==================================================================== 3 . 35850 |================================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 1133 |===================================================================== 2 . 1118 |==================================================================== 3 . 1129 |===================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better 1 . 377795 |===================================================================