5950X + RTX 3080 AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core testing with a ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (2311 BIOS) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (2311 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 2000GB Corsair Force MP600 + 2000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB (660/810MHz), Audio: NVIDIA Device 1aef, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-51-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: NVIDIA 455.38, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.1.110, Vulkan: 1.2.142, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (2311 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 2000GB Corsair Force MP600 + 2000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB (885/810MHz), Audio: NVIDIA Device 1aef, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-51-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: NVIDIA 455.38, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.1.110, Vulkan: 1.2.142, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (2311 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 2000GB Corsair Force MP600 + 2000GB, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB (1710/9501MHz), Audio: NVIDIA Device 1aef, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-51-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: NVIDIA 455.38, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.1.110, Vulkan: 1.2.142, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 81.88 |==================================================================== 2 . 81.70 |==================================================================== 3 . 81.79 |==================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.72 |==================================================================== 3 . 22.68 |=================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.52 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.45 |==================================================================== 3 . 22.48 |==================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.50 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.40 |==================================================================== 3 . 22.91 |================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.34 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 21.21 |==================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.93 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.71 |=================================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.03 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.16 |==================================================================== 3 . 21.06 |==================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 534.81 |=================================================================== 2 . 533.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 534.22 |=================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.52 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.46 |==================================================================== 3 . 21.47 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 13.23 |=================================================================== 2 . 13.51 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.43 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.0 |====================================================================== 2 . 2.0 |====================================================================== 3 . 2.0 |====================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 1783.27 |================================================================= 2 . 1799.94 |================================================================== 3 . 1790.15 |================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 59.8 |===================================================================== 2 . 60.1 |===================================================================== 3 . 59.9 |===================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 59.16 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.87 |==================================================================== 3 . 59.09 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 59.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 59.9 |===================================================================== 3 . 59.5 |===================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 59.75 |==================================================================== 2 . 59.07 |=================================================================== 3 . 59.47 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 13.46 |=================================================================== 2 . 13.51 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.57 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 19.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 19.22 |==================================================================== 3 . 19.30 |==================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 57.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.02 |==================================================================== 3 . 57.23 |=================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 60.3 |===================================================================== 2 . 60.4 |===================================================================== 3 . 60.4 |===================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 1 . 58.66 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.53 |==================================================================== 3 . 58.52 |==================================================================== GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.229 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.229 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.216 |=================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.417 |=================================================================== 2 . 1.418 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.433 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 15.81 |==================================================================== 3 . 15.91 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.592 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.623 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.646 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.004 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.992 |==================================================================== 3 . 6.996 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.106 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.107 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.108 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.775 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.772 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.781 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.206 |================================================================== 2 . 0.208 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.211 |==================================================================== Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.522 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.497 |=================================================================== 3 . 6.559 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.923 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.921 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.916 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.278 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.315 |==================================================================== 3 . 8.308 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16.07 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.10 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.11 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: OpenCL GPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 42.49 |==================================================================== 2 . 42.67 |==================================================================== 3 . 42.11 |=================================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: GPU OpenCL Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 186891 |=================================================================== 2 . 187896 |=================================================================== 3 . 187699 |=================================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: GPU Vulkan Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 153320 |================================================================== 2 . 154724 |================================================================== 3 . 156633 |=================================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 13962 |==================================================================== 2 . 13868 |==================================================================== 3 . 13902 |==================================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 1724 |===================================================================== 2 . 1731 |===================================================================== 3 . 1715 |==================================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: GPU NVIDIA CUDA Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 202117 |=================================================================== 2 . 201824 |=================================================================== 3 . 202088 |===================================================================