cryptography-2650v4
VMware testing on CentOS Linux 8 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4: 

	Processor: 12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 (23 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (VMW71.00V.13989454.B64.1906190538 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 4 x 16 GB DRAM VMW-16384MB, Disk: 54GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3

	OS: CentOS Linux 8, Kernel: 5.9.2-1.el8.elrepo.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.1 20191121, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1176x885, System Layer: VMware


Crypto++ 8.2
Test: All Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 896.91 |==========================================


Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Keyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 339.18 |==========================================


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: MD5
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 667855 |==========================================


Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 2880.45 |=========================================


Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-whirlpool
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 399596 |==========================================


Cryptsetup 2.2.2
PBKDF2-sha512
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 971243 |==========================================


Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Unkeyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 178.04 |==========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: MeowHash
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 72.97 |===========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: MeowHash
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 27704.43 |========================================


John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1
Test: Blowfish
Real C/S > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 10712 |===========================================


Aircrack-ng 1.5.2

k/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 24733.12 |========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: Spooky32
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 55.78 |===========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: Spooky32
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 12778.23 |========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: fasthash32
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 41.33 |===========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: fasthash32
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 6387.44 |=========================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: AES-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 2177.97 |=========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha2_atonce
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 41.54 |===========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha2_atonce
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 13706.44 |========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 42.22 |===========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 28940.29 |========================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: Blowfish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 258.33 |==========================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: Twofish
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 210.38 |==========================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: CAST-256
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 82.10 |===========================================


Botan 2.13.0
Test: KASUMI
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 55.15 |===========================================


OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 2067.4 |==========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: wyhash
cycles/hash < Lower Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 32.13 |===========================================


SMHasher 2020-02-29
Hash: wyhash
MiB/sec > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 15055.53 |========================================


Nettle 3.5.1
Test: aes256
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 4130.63 |=========================================


Nettle 3.5.1
Test: sha512
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 296.31 |==========================================


Nettle 3.5.1
Test: chacha
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 578.90 |==========================================


BLAKE2 20170307

Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 5.52 |============================================


Nettle 3.5.1
Test: poly1305-aes
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
12 x Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4 . 1606.22 |=========================================