gpu2020 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core testing with a Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF (F50 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1050ti/2020-09-19: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core @ 3.40GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF (F50 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850 + 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB (1341/3504MHz), Audio: NVIDIA GP107GL HD Audio, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-64-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.18.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 440.100, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.2.185, Vulkan: 1.1.119, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + Clang 9.0.0-2 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900 ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core @ 3.40GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF (F50 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850 + 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB (1341/3504MHz), Audio: NVIDIA GP107GL HD Audio, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-64-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.18.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 440.100, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.2.185, Vulkan: 1.1.119, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008 + Clang 9.0.0-2 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900 AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core - ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core @ 3.40GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF (F50 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850 + 2000GB Seagate ST2000DM006-2DM1, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GB (1771/3504MHz), Audio: NVIDIA GP107GL HD Audio, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.3.0-64-generic (x86_64), Desktop: KDE Plasma 5.18.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: NVIDIA 440.100, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.2.185, Vulkan: 1.1.119, Compiler: GCC 8.4.0 + Clang 9.0.0-2 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1440x900 Hashcat 6.1.1 Benchmark: MD5 H/s > Higher Is Better 1050ti/2020-09-19 . 7622666667 |=============================================== NAMD CUDA 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 0.54953 |==================================== ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 0.54417 |==================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 10.92 |====================================== OctaneBench 4.00c Total Score Score > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 55.66 |====================================== LuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 1.10 |======================================= LuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3 Scene: Food M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 0.40 |======================================= LuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 0.88 |======================================= LuxCoreRender OpenCL 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 3.68 |======================================= LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 1.10 |======================================= LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 1.14 |======================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti . 8482 |======================================= Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core - ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX . 2843.23 |================ Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core - ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX . 5672.26 |================ Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core - ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX . 6674.35 |================ Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: NVIDIA CUDA - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core - ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX . 13387.0 |================