1065G7 2020 Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus G7 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 34ef, Memory: 16GB, Disk: KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus G7 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 34ef, Memory: 16GB, Disk: KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus G7 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 34ef, Memory: 16GB, Disk: KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus G7 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 Sockperf 3.4 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 556058 |=================================================================== 2 . 552977 |================================================================== 3 . 559600 |=================================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.743 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.707 |=================================================================== 3 . 3.730 |==================================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better 1 . 47.98 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.13 |=============================================================== 3 . 45.96 |================================================================= Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better 1 . 486752506.36 |============================================================= 2 . 483075380.37 |============================================================= 3 . 480248201.14 |============================================================ Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 119.25 |=================================================================== 2 . 119.18 |=================================================================== 3 . 119.13 |=================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 88.78 |==================================================================== 2 . 88.72 |==================================================================== 3 . 88.89 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 91.50 |==================================================================== 2 . 91.73 |==================================================================== 3 . 91.70 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 25.79 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.71 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 3.80 |===================================================================== FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 26447.66 |================================================================= 2 . 26458.66 |================================================================= 3 . 26458.86 |================================================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 49124225.0 |=============================================================== 2 . 48894727.8 |=============================================================== 3 . 48958206.2 |===============================================================