Intel Xeon Silver 4216 testing with a TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2009275-FI-XEONSILVE34
Xeon Silver 4216 Sunday
Intel Xeon Silver 4216 testing with a TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: Intel Xeon Silver 4216 @ 3.20GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 24GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: 2 x Intel I350
OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
2:
Processor: Intel Xeon Silver 4216 @ 3.20GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 24GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: 2 x Intel I350
OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
3:
Processor: Intel Xeon Silver 4216 @ 3.20GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 24GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: 2 x Intel I350
OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 67732 |====================================================================
2 . 67878 |====================================================================
3 . 67951 |====================================================================
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 200
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 135539 |===================================================================
2 . 135442 |===================================================================
3 . 135714 |===================================================================
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 1000
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 677124 |===================================================================
2 . 677444 |===================================================================
3 . 677230 |===================================================================
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 191034 |===================================================================
2 . 190769 |===================================================================
3 . 191137 |===================================================================
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 200
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 382578 |===================================================================
2 . 381187 |===================================================================
3 . 381767 |===================================================================
Caffe 2020-02-13
Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 1000
Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1912510 |==================================================================
2 . 1908983 |==================================================================
Dolfyn 0.527
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 26.90 |====================================================================
2 . 26.98 |====================================================================
eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907
Text-To-Speech Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 41.80 |====================================================================
2 . 41.35 |===================================================================
3 . 41.05 |===================================================================
GROMACS 2020.3
Water Benchmark
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
1 . 1.344 |====================================================================
2 . 1.340 |====================================================================
3 . 1.337 |====================================================================
Hierarchical INTegration 1.0
Test: FLOAT
QUIPs > Higher Is Better
1 . 316880770.52 |=============================================================
2 . 318598366.39 |=============================================================
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 833001.1 |=================================================================
2 . 838923.1 |=================================================================
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 1067166.1 |================================================================
2 . 1065168.6 |================================================================
InfluxDB 1.8.2
Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000
val/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 1118107.7 |================================================================
2 . 1118858.5 |================================================================
LibRaw 0.20
Post-Processing Benchmark
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 27.05 |====================================================================
2 . 27.06 |====================================================================
3 . 27.08 |====================================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_ica
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 66.09 |====================================================================
2 . 65.68 |====================================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_qda
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 35.90 |====================================================================
2 . 36.01 |====================================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_svm
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 20.09 |====================================================================
2 . 20.14 |====================================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.58 |=====================================================================
2 . 2.55 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 21681 |===================================================================
2 . 22067 |====================================================================
3 . 21782 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.046 |====================================================================
2 . 0.045 |===================================================================
3 . 0.046 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 552 |====================================================================
2 . 568 |======================================================================
3 . 556 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.813 |====================================================================
2 . 1.761 |==================================================================
3 . 1.799 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 454312 |===================================================================
2 . 454123 |===================================================================
3 . 455432 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.11 |=====================================================================
2 . 0.11 |=====================================================================
3 . 0.11 |=====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 419721 |===================================================================
2 . 418688 |===================================================================
3 . 420332 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.239 |====================================================================
2 . 0.239 |====================================================================
3 . 0.238 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 419960 |===================================================================
2 . 413308 |==================================================================
3 . 413520 |==================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.596 |===================================================================
2 . 0.605 |====================================================================
3 . 0.605 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 734 |======================================================================
2 . 731 |======================================================================
3 . 733 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 68.13 |====================================================================
2 . 68.47 |====================================================================
3 . 68.30 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 19239 |====================================================================
2 . 19256 |====================================================================
3 . 19216 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.052 |====================================================================
2 . 0.052 |====================================================================
3 . 0.052 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 726 |=====================================================
2 . 760 |========================================================
3 . 951 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 137.92 |===================================================================
2 . 133.71 |=================================================================
3 . 105.36 |===================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 676 |=====================================================
2 . 866 |====================================================================
3 . 888 |======================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 370.82 |===================================================================
2 . 289.83 |====================================================
3 . 282.08 |===================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 667 |======================================================================
2 . 561 |===========================================================
3 . 557 |==========================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 1.500 |=======================================================
2 . 1.860 |====================================================================
3 . 1.827 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 386512 |===================================================================
2 . 385663 |===================================================================
3 . 385609 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.129 |===================================================================
2 . 0.130 |====================================================================
3 . 0.129 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 350850 |===================================================================
2 . 348095 |==================================================================
3 . 349236 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.286 |====================================================================
2 . 0.288 |====================================================================
3 . 0.287 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 323143 |===================================================================
2 . 323114 |===================================================================
3 . 323229 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 0.775 |====================================================================
2 . 0.775 |====================================================================
3 . 0.775 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 7976 |=====================================================================
2 . 7744 |===================================================================
3 . 7120 |==============================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 6.491 |=============================================================
2 . 6.750 |================================================================
3 . 7.195 |====================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 11052 |====================================================================
2 . 8513 |====================================================
3 . 8468 |====================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 9.336 |===================================================
2 . 12.246 |===================================================================
3 . 12.338 |===================================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write
TPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 11272 |====================================================================
2 . 9280 |========================================================
3 . 10298 |==============================================================
PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0
Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 23.19 |======================================================
2 . 28.95 |====================================================================
3 . 25.91 |=============================================================
Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471
Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 12.96 |====================================================================
2 . 12.97 |====================================================================
3 . 13.01 |====================================================================
TNN 0.2.3
Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 435.09 |===================================================================
2 . 435.21 |===================================================================
TNN 0.2.3
Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 417.86 |===================================================================
2 . 418.09 |===================================================================
WebP Image Encode 1.1
Encode Settings: Default
Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.089 |====================================================================
2 . 2.090 |====================================================================
3 . 2.091 |====================================================================
WebP Image Encode 1.1
Encode Settings: Quality 100
Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 3.221 |====================================================================
2 . 3.217 |====================================================================
3 . 3.215 |====================================================================
WebP Image Encode 1.1
Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless
Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 22.50 |====================================================================
2 . 22.52 |====================================================================
3 . 22.34 |===================================================================
WebP Image Encode 1.1
Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression
Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 9.961 |====================================================================
2 . 9.969 |====================================================================
3 . 9.984 |====================================================================
WebP Image Encode 1.1
Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression
Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 49.89 |===================================================================
2 . 50.64 |====================================================================
3 . 50.24 |===================================================================