Xeon Silver 4216 Sunday Intel Xeon Silver 4216 testing with a TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS) and ASPEED on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon Silver 4216 @ 3.20GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 24GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 2: Processor: Intel Xeon Silver 4216 @ 3.20GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 24GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 3: Processor: Intel Xeon Silver 4216 @ 3.20GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN S7100AG2NR (V4.02 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 24GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: ASPEED, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: 2 x Intel I350 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 4.19.0-9-amd64 (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.96 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.97 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.01 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Default Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.089 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.090 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.091 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100 Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.221 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.217 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.215 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.50 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.52 |==================================================================== 3 . 22.34 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.961 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.969 |==================================================================== 3 . 9.984 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 49.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 50.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 50.24 |=================================================================== LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 27.05 |==================================================================== 2 . 27.06 |==================================================================== 3 . 27.08 |==================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 41.80 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.35 |=================================================================== 3 . 41.05 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.344 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.340 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.337 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 21681 |=================================================================== 2 . 22067 |==================================================================== 3 . 21782 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.046 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.045 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.046 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 552 |==================================================================== 2 . 568 |====================================================================== 3 . 556 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.813 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.761 |================================================================== 3 . 1.799 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 454312 |=================================================================== 2 . 454123 |=================================================================== 3 . 455432 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.11 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.11 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.11 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 419721 |=================================================================== 2 . 418688 |=================================================================== 3 . 420332 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.239 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.239 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.238 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 419960 |=================================================================== 2 . 413308 |================================================================== 3 . 413520 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.596 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.605 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.605 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 734 |====================================================================== 2 . 731 |====================================================================== 3 . 733 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 68.13 |==================================================================== 2 . 68.47 |==================================================================== 3 . 68.30 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 19239 |==================================================================== 2 . 19256 |==================================================================== 3 . 19216 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.052 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.052 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.052 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 726 |===================================================== 2 . 760 |======================================================== 3 . 951 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 137.92 |=================================================================== 2 . 133.71 |================================================================= 3 . 105.36 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 676 |===================================================== 2 . 866 |==================================================================== 3 . 888 |====================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 370.82 |=================================================================== 2 . 289.83 |==================================================== 3 . 282.08 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 667 |====================================================================== 2 . 561 |=========================================================== 3 . 557 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1.500 |======================================================= 2 . 1.860 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.827 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 386512 |=================================================================== 2 . 385663 |=================================================================== 3 . 385609 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.129 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.130 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.129 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 350850 |=================================================================== 2 . 348095 |================================================================== 3 . 349236 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.286 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.288 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.287 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 323143 |=================================================================== 2 . 323114 |=================================================================== 3 . 323229 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.775 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.775 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.775 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 7976 |===================================================================== 2 . 7744 |=================================================================== 3 . 7120 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.491 |============================================================= 2 . 6.750 |================================================================ 3 . 7.195 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 11052 |==================================================================== 2 . 8513 |==================================================== 3 . 8468 |==================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.336 |=================================================== 2 . 12.246 |=================================================================== 3 . 12.338 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 11272 |==================================================================== 2 . 9280 |======================================================== 3 . 10298 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 23.19 |====================================================== 2 . 28.95 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.91 |============================================================= Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 67732 |==================================================================== 2 . 67878 |==================================================================== 3 . 67951 |==================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 135539 |=================================================================== 2 . 135442 |=================================================================== 3 . 135714 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: AlexNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 677124 |=================================================================== 2 . 677444 |=================================================================== 3 . 677230 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 100 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 191034 |=================================================================== 2 . 190769 |=================================================================== 3 . 191137 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 200 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 382578 |=================================================================== 2 . 381187 |=================================================================== 3 . 381767 |=================================================================== Caffe 2020-02-13 Model: GoogleNet - Acceleration: CPU - Iterations: 1000 Milli-Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1912510 |================================================================== 2 . 1908983 |================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 435.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 435.21 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 417.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 418.09 |=================================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 833001.1 |================================================================= 2 . 838923.1 |================================================================= InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1067166.1 |================================================================ 2 . 1065168.6 |================================================================ InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1118107.7 |================================================================ 2 . 1118858.5 |================================================================ Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.98 |==================================================================== Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better 1 . 316880770.52 |============================================================= 2 . 318598366.39 |============================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 66.09 |==================================================================== 2 . 65.68 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 35.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 36.01 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.09 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.14 |==================================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.58 |===================================================================== 2 . 2.55 |====================================================================