haswell-xeon-extra Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 testing with a ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 1a: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-47-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.48 |================================================================== 2 . 16.66 |=================================================================== 3 . 16.89 |==================================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.55 |=================================================================== 2 . 15.75 |==================================================================== 3 . 15.79 |==================================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 39.23 |================================================================== 2 . 40.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 39.87 |=================================================================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 29.04 |=================================================================== 2 . 28.96 |=================================================================== 3 . 29.30 |==================================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better 1 . 85.79 |================================================================= 2 . 89.77 |==================================================================== 3 . 89.79 |==================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Default Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 1.836 |=================================================================== 1a . 1.841 |=================================================================== 2 .. 1.833 |=================================================================== 3 .. 1.832 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100 Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 2.808 |=================================================================== 1a . 2.799 |=================================================================== 2 .. 2.814 |=================================================================== 3 .. 2.805 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 20.32 |=================================================================== 1a . 20.25 |=================================================================== 2 .. 20.30 |=================================================================== 3 .. 20.37 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 8.506 |=================================================================== 1a . 8.495 |=================================================================== 2 .. 8.504 |=================================================================== 3 .. 8.482 |=================================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 42.35 |=================================================================== 1a . 42.24 |=================================================================== 2 .. 42.14 |=================================================================== 3 .. 42.34 |=================================================================== LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 .. 31.70 |=================================================================== 1a . 31.82 |=================================================================== 2 .. 31.63 |=================================================================== 3 .. 31.57 |================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 36.16 |================================================================== 1a . 36.16 |================================================================== 2 .. 36.09 |================================================================== 3 .. 36.58 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 181719 |================================================================== 2 .. 180335 |================================================================= 3 .. 181034 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.275 |================================================================== 2 .. 0.278 |=================================================================== 3 .. 0.276 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 177803 |================================================================== 2 .. 176603 |================================================================== 3 .. 176819 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.563 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.567 |=================================================================== 3 .. 0.566 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 173802 |================================================================== 2 .. 172613 |================================================================== 3 .. 172876 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1.439 |=================================================================== 2 .. 1.449 |=================================================================== 3 .. 1.447 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 716 |===================================================================== 2 .. 713 |===================================================================== 3 .. 713 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 69.81 |=================================================================== 2 .. 70.17 |=================================================================== 3 .. 70.14 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 685 |===================================================================== 2 .. 688 |===================================================================== 3 .. 684 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 146.04 |================================================================== 2 .. 145.34 |================================================================== 3 .. 146.39 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 673 |===================================================================== 2 .. 644 |================================================================== 3 .. 662 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 371.71 |=============================================================== 2 .. 388.51 |================================================================== 3 .. 378.19 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 156999 |================================================================== 2 .. 155784 |================================================================= 3 .. 155649 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.319 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.321 |=================================================================== 3 .. 0.321 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 156357 |================================================================== 2 .. 154584 |================================================================= 3 .. 154777 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 0.640 |================================================================== 2 .. 0.647 |=================================================================== 3 .. 0.646 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 149080 |================================================================== 2 .. 147764 |================================================================= 3 .. 147756 |================================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 1.678 |================================================================== 2 .. 1.693 |=================================================================== 3 .. 1.693 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 6465 |=================================================================== 2 .. 5891 |============================================================= 3 .. 6516 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 7.737 |========================================================= 2 .. 9.166 |=================================================================== 3 .. 7.678 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 8692 |==================================================================== 2 .. 8359 |================================================================= 3 .. 8414 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 11.51 |================================================================ 2 .. 12.01 |=================================================================== 3 .. 11.90 |================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 1a . 9762 |==================================================================== 2 .. 6425 |============================================= 3 .. 8248 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 25.64 |=============================== 2 .. 55.50 |=================================================================== 3 .. 34.07 |========================================= NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 18.37 |================================================================== 2 .. 18.37 |================================================================== 3 .. 18.52 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 20.45 |================================================================== 2 .. 20.28 |================================================================== 3 .. 20.70 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 6.26 |==================================================================== 2 .. 6.27 |==================================================================== 3 .. 6.29 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 5.57 |==================================================================== 2 .. 5.61 |==================================================================== 3 .. 5.61 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 4.67 |==================================================================== 2 .. 4.64 |==================================================================== 3 .. 4.64 |==================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 5.53 |==================================================================== 2 .. 5.51 |==================================================================== 3 .. 5.45 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 8.16 |==================================================================== 2 .. 8.08 |=================================================================== 3 .. 8.05 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 2.07 |==================================================================== 2 .. 2.07 |==================================================================== 3 .. 2.00 |================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 16.12 |=================================================================== 2 .. 16.21 |=================================================================== 3 .. 16.14 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 52.08 |=================================================================== 2 .. 52.04 |=================================================================== 3 .. 52.10 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 14.50 |=================================================================== 2 .. 14.58 |=================================================================== 3 .. 14.53 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 12.71 |=================================================================== 2 .. 12.67 |=================================================================== 3 .. 12.52 |================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 27.90 |=================================================================== 2 .. 27.86 |=================================================================== 3 .. 27.85 |=================================================================== NCNN 20200916 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 31.42 |=================================================================== 2 .. 30.81 |================================================================== 3 .. 31.32 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 312.38 |================================================================== 2 .. 313.58 |================================================================== 3 .. 312.66 |================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 295.80 |================================================================== 2 .. 296.24 |================================================================== 3 .. 296.55 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.4 Test: Features 2D ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 175152 |================================================================= 2 .. 171905 |================================================================ 3 .. 177838 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.4 Test: Object Detection ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 120604 |================================================================ 2 .. 115585 |============================================================= 3 .. 124643 |================================================================== OpenCV 4.4 Test: DNN - Deep Neural Network ms < Lower Is Better 1a . 4643 |========================================================== 2 .. 5489 |==================================================================== 3 .. 4882 |============================================================ InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 968924.1 |=============================================================== 2 .. 978842.8 |================================================================ InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 1071919.0 |=============================================================== 2 .. 1076934.1 |=============================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 1167781.7 |=============================================================== 2 .. 1146158.8 |============================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 137.96 |================================================================== 2 .. 135.62 |=================================================================