Wireguard

Case closed / no active cooling

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2009160-NE-2009154AS15
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
RPi3B
September 15 2020
  3 Hours, 3 Minutes
SamsungNP3005l
September 16 2020
  2 Hours, 23 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 43 Minutes


WireguardProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsChipsetAudioNetworkOSKernelCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLRPi3BSamsungNP3005lARMv8 Cortex-A53 @ 1.20GHz (4 Cores)raspberrypi rpi (2020.04 BIOS)935MB64GB SB64Gvc4drmfbFedora 325.8.6-201.fc32.aarch64 (aarch64) 20200904GCC 10.2.1 20200723btrfs720x480Intel Core i3-6006U @ 2.00GHz (2 Cores / 4 Threads)SAMSUNG NP300E5L-KF1BR (P08RED.021.181123.ZW BIOS)Intel Skylake2 x 4096 MB DDR4-2133MT/s SF464128CKHIWDFSEG1000GB Western Digital WD10JPVX-35JIntel HD 520 3GB (900MHz)Realtek ALC256Realtek RTL8101/2/6E + Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 802.11acDebian stable-updates4.19.0-10-amd64 (x86_64)KDE Plasma 5.17.5X Server 1.20.4modesetting 1.20.44.5 Mesa 18.3.6GCC 9.3.0ext41920x1080OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- RPi3B: Scaling Governor: cpufreq-dt ondemand- SamsungNP3005l: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xd6Security Details- RPi3B: SELinux + itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Not affected + spectre_v1: Mitigation of __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Not affected + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - SamsungNP3005l: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Vulnerable: No microcode + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test

This is a benchmark of the WireGuard secure VPN tunnel and Linux networking stack stress test. The test runs on the local host but does require root permissions to run. The way it works is it creates three namespaces. ns0 has a loopback device. ns1 and ns2 each have wireguard devices. Those two wireguard devices send traffic through the loopback device of ns0. The end result of this is that tests wind up testing encryption and decryption at the same time -- a pretty CPU and scheduler-heavy workflow. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress TestSamsungNP3005lRPi3B8001600240032004000SE +/- 486.17, N = 6SE +/- 41.83, N = 31422.303653.98
OpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress TestSamsungNP3005lRPi3B6001200180024003000Min: 753.88 / Avg: 1422.3 / Max: 3834.19Min: 3594.41 / Avg: 3653.98 / Max: 3734.63