Sandy Bridge 2020 Intel Core i7-2700K testing with a BIOSTAR B75MU3B v5.0 (4.6.5 BIOS) and Intel Sandybridge Desktop 2GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Core i7 2700K: Processor: Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: BIOSTAR B75MU3B v5.0 (4.6.5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 525GB Crucial_CT525MX3, Graphics: Intel Sandybridge Desktop 2GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev1, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.5.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20191221, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.4, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191130, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Intel Core i7 2700K: Processor: Intel Core i7-2700K @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: BIOSTAR B75MU3B v5.0 (4.6.5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 525GB Crucial CT525MX3, Graphics: Intel Sandybridge Desktop 2GB (1350MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC662 rev1, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.5.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20191221, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.4, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191130, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 236 |========================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 116 |========================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: Random Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 135082 |======================================================= Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 296.81 |======================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 4377 |========================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 6776 |========================================================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 1598.8 |================================================= Intel Core i7 2700K . 1498.9 |============================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 16.1 |=================================================== Intel Core i7 2700K . 13.8 |============================================ oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 24.44 |======================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 242.85 |======================================================= oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 89.63 |======================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 1301.91 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 45.21 |======================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 66.53 |======================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 430.81 |======================================================= oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 84.42 |======================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 2386.53 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 293.73 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 180.86 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 45.16 |======================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 175.04 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 50.99 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 0.11 |=================================================== Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.09 |========================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 0.96 |=================================================== Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.87 |============================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 7.79 |=================================================== Intel Core i7 2700K . 6.92 |============================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 1.52 |=================================================== Intel Core i7 2700K . 1.37 |============================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 21.65 |================================================== Intel Core i7 2700K . 19.23 |============================================ Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3.1204 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3.4265 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3.8174 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3.5766 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 4.5036 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3.9974 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 0.006 |======================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 0.093 |======================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 0.495 |======================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 1.57 |========================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 42.56 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 0.39 |========================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 0.43 |========================================================= 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 18179 |======================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K ....... 238.29 |========================================== Intel Core i7 2700K . 276.79 |================================================= Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 302.78 |======================================================= YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 476.90 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 148.93 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 26.08 |======================================================== G'MIC Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 86.72 |======================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 10.53 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 32.88 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 69.25 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 218.21 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 208549.95 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 522.67 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 18594404.61 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 31877.90 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 43610.36 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 11.57 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 1298.67 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 806314.40 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 11863.24 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 20714.85 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 661.69 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3094.45 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 1056611.72 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 276081.12 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 41.17 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 6903863.29 |=================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3088 |========================================================= NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i7 2700K . 3.72 |========================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i7 2700K . 72.21 |======================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0834 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0854 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.1030 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.1221 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0400 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0409 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0602 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0693 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0432 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0445 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0634 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.0757 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.1028 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.1033 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.1192 |================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 0.1428 |================================================= LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 202 |==================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 205 |==================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Random Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 104711 |================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 1106.83 |================================================ Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 205.37 |================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 527.08 |================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 179.38 |================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 64.97 |================================================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 6.95032 |================================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 73.27 |================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 436.32 |================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 51.28 |================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 111.55 |================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 172.92 |================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 15085.5 |================================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 5120.47 |================================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 26.33 |================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 359.80 |================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 211.92 |================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 12.80 |================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 11.35 |================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 41.98 |================================================== Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 114.13 |================================================= System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 3.512 |================================================== System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 2005.79 |================================================ perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 112223 |================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 4039340 |================================================ perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 2.875747 |=============================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 32.45 |================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 261021 |================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 1854 |=================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 21817982 |=============================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 381.57 |================================================= Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 14595.19 |=============================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 484.04 |================================================= TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet Microseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 849978 |================================================= TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 Microseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 11691267 |=============================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile Microseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 1385507 |================================================ TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float Microseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 599156 |================================================= TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant Microseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 601047 |================================================= TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 Microseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 10723333 |=============================================== Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 180.30 |================================================= OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 88.08 |================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 375 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 549 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 174 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 170 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 185 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 34.4 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 722 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 37.6 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 150 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 249 |==================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 11.3 |=================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 100.0 |================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 737 |==================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 2475 |=================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 137.6 |================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 20.3 |=================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 70.1 |=================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 802 |==================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 41.5 |=================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 6.44 |=================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 20.4 |=================================================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i7 2700K . 37.28 |==================================================