tests 10900K
Intel Core i9-10900K testing with a Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS) and Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Core i9 10900K: 

	Processor: Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB (1890/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201

	OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.0-devel (git-ef67218 2020-07-07 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), OpenCL: OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 20.2.0-devel (git-c977567db6), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


LeelaChessZero 0.26
Backend: BLAS
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 299 |=========================================================


LeelaChessZero 0.26
Backend: Eigen
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 506 |=========================================================


LeelaChessZero 0.26
Backend: Random
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 269039 |======================================================


NAMD 2.14
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1.24269 |=====================================================


Zstd Compression 1.4.5
Compression Level: 3
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 2565.2 |======================================================


Zstd Compression 1.4.5
Compression Level: 19
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 28.3 |========================================================


perf-bench
Benchmark: Epoll Wait
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 121053 |======================================================


perf-bench
Benchmark: Futex Hash
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 6541192 |=====================================================


perf-bench
Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB
GB/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 31.82 |=======================================================


perf-bench
Benchmark: Memset 1MB
GB/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 54.03 |=======================================================


perf-bench
Benchmark: Sched Pipe
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 257043 |======================================================


perf-bench
Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 897 |=========================================================


perf-bench
Benchmark: Syscall Basic
ops/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 22211097 |====================================================


GROMACS 2020.1
Water Benchmark
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 0.867 |=======================================================


Blender 2.90
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 113.79 |======================================================


Blender 2.90
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 350.11 |======================================================


Blender 2.90
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 161.28 |======================================================


Blender 2.90
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 487.60 |======================================================


Blender 2.90
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 394.10 |======================================================