Core i5 9400F September 2020 Intel Core i5-9400F testing with a MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS) and MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Core i5 9400F: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000H7, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2-generic (x86_64) 20200823, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.7, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Core i5 9400F . 2.86621 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 2884.3 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 20.5 |========================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 348.83 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 97.28 |======================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 336.75 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 84.91 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 0.26 |========================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 2.20 |========================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 17.66 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 3.48 |========================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 39.77 |======================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 0.094 |======================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 1.991 |======================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 15.20 |======================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 116.21 |======================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 117.76 |======================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 95.26 |======================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 9400F . 159.76 |======================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Epoll Wait ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 236625 |======================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Hash ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 2160524 |====================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memcpy 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 30.13 |======================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Memset 1MB GB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 48.92 |======================================================== perf-bench Benchmark: Sched Pipe ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 195787 |======================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Futex Lock-Pi ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 1337 |========================================================= perf-bench Benchmark: Syscall Basic ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 9400F . 2753261 |====================================================== Blender 2.90 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 9400F . 315.16 |======================================================= Blender 2.90 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 9400F . 953.82 |======================================================= Blender 2.90 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 9400F . 458.00 |======================================================= Blender 2.90 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 9400F . 1381.50 |====================================================== Blender 2.90 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 9400F . 1138.58 |======================================================