Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. CPUFreq Ondemand: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Powersave: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Performance: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Schedutil: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 315.78 |============================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 280.40 |======================================== CPUFreq Performance . 340.81 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 291.65 |========================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 484.61 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 296.31 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 507.31 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 499.86 |================================================ Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 304.02 |========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 216.54 |============================== CPUFreq Performance . 355.74 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 340.86 |=============================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 276.41 |========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 197.73 |============================== CPUFreq Performance . 322.58 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 312.77 |================================================ Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 237.51 |============================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 171.90 |================================ CPUFreq Performance . 261.78 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 255.44 |================================================ ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 37.23 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 36.92 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 37.29 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 37.49 |================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 3732.44 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 3701.44 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 3738.39 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3758.79 |================================================ ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 137.98 |========================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 134.31 |======================================== CPUFreq Performance . 165.70 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 154.43 |============================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 2207.62 |======================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 2148.90 |======================================= CPUFreq Performance . 2651.19 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2470.88 |============================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 149.95 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 148.30 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 150.20 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 150.61 |================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1562.66 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 1545.49 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1565.25 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1569.49 |================================================ WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 194.38 |=============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 310.32 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 188.87 |============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 194.83 |=============================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1.48719 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 2.62037 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1.49139 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1.48668 |=========================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 5.82 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 11.53 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.80 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.78 |========================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 3.16 |=========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 3.74 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 3.14 |=========================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3.17 |=========================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 12.05 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 24.51 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 12.03 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.79 |======================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1421630 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 667132 |======================= CPUFreq Performance . 1341574 |============================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1394766 |=============================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 198.57 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 147.27 |=================================== CPUFreq Performance . 206.13 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 198.31 |=============================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 543.61 |====================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 409.08 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 692.69 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 451.11 |================================ SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.538 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 2.595 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 4.596 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.558 |================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 36.86 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 21.40 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 38.17 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 36.99 |================================================ VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 7.70 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.33 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 8.17 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 8.14 |=================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 25.95 |============================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 15.96 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 29.40 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 28.71 |================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 140.66 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 81.36 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 147.14 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 129.99 |=========================================== x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 62.17 |============================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 38.44 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 69.36 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 43.71 |================================ libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 66.34 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 124.55 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 66.17 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 66.65 |========================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 40.18 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 74.93 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 40.11 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 39.87 |=========================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.516 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 8.378 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.507 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.573 |=========================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.327 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 8.096 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.385 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.333 |=========================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 56.23 |============================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 97.44 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 55.55 |============================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 56.92 |============================= Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 438.28 |============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 711.99 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 430.40 |============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 423.25 |============================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 41.90 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 76.68 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 41.93 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 41.98 |=========================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 229.01 |============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 371.59 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 228.98 |============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 230.20 |============================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 12 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 303.32 |============================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 508.17 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 304.27 |============================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 304.21 |============================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 7.584 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 14.975 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 7.528 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 7.661 |========================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 6.902 |======================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 14.031 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 7.037 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6.877 |======================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1953663 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 3562533 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1952597 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1949273 |========================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 94295.5 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 173472.0 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 94728.2 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 94400.8 |========================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1758000 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 3204470 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1757590 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1754397 |========================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 17.52 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 31.95 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 17.51 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 17.48 |=========================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 138.85 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 252.14 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 138.91 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 138.82 |=========================== Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 43.84 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 81.64 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 43.61 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 44.16 |=========================== OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 20.88 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 38.71 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 20.39 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 20.43 |========================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 21642 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 12637 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 21587 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 21664 |================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 108.91 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 195.75 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 109.57 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 108.89 |=========================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 152 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 311 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 154 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 154 |========================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 8.09 |================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 12.60 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 6.43 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12.50 |================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 11365 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 7746 |================================== CPUFreq Performance . 11375 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11207 |================================================= Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 794.7 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 455.4 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 793.0 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 741.8 |=============================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 137.6 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 74.7 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 135.2 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 139.4 |================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 240.2 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 192.3 |======================================== CPUFreq Performance . 242.5 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 242.0 |================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1440 |=================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 724 |========================== CPUFreq Performance . 1444 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1405 |================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 88.6 |=================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 44.2 |========================= CPUFreq Performance . 88.6 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 86.4 |================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 11.60 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 5.72 |======================== CPUFreq Performance . 11.70 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.50 |================================================= Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 33.2 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 16.8 |========================== CPUFreq Performance . 33.6 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 32.6 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 732.6 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 1352.6 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 694.6 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 704.4 |========================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 13599 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 8478 |=============================== CPUFreq Performance . 13841 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 85.4 |========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 62.5 |=============================== CPUFreq Performance . 101.0 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 79.3 |======================================= Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.4 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.7 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.0 |============================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.7 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 103.00 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 54.50 |========================= CPUFreq Performance . 105.50 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 102.00 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 688.6 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 1286.5 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 657.2 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 683.5 |========================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1298 |============================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 2365 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1234 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1391 |============================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .. 22145 |==================================================== CPUFreq Powersave . 13518 |================================ CPUFreq Schedutil . 21339 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 36.52 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 20.56 |========================== CPUFreq Performance . 38.70 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 39.10 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.3 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.7 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 3.7 |========================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.7 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 143.00 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 76.89 |========================= CPUFreq Performance . 148.20 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 139.00 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Score < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1309 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 2456 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1304 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1346 |============================ Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 26.3 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 52.8 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 25.7 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 25.2 |======================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 356.6 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 718.1 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 360.1 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 348.3 |======================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 27.18 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 54.57 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 27.36 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 27.18 |========================= Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 272.85 |======================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 555.01 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 280.43 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 273.80 |======================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 22.79 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 42.68 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 22.55 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 22.51 |========================== Geometric Mean Of All Test Results Result Composite - Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 13.806 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 8.418 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 14.303 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 13.671 |=============================================== Number Of First Place Finishes Wins - 72 Tests Wins CPUFreq Ondemand .... 10 |============= CPUFreq Performance . 40 |===================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 22 |=============================