AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2008290-SYST-LINUX5962
Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
CPUFreq Ondemand:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
CPUFreq Powersave:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
CPUFreq Performance:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
CPUFreq Schedutil:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
Selenium
Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 732.6 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 1352.6 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 694.6 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 704.4 |==========================
Open Porous Media
OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 229.01 |==============================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 371.59 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 228.98 |==============================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 230.20 |==============================
Selenium
Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 13599 |=================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 8478 |===============================
CPUFreq Performance . 13841 |==================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox
Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 85.4 |==========================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 62.5 |===============================
CPUFreq Performance . 101.0 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 79.3 |=======================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.4 |=================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.7 |====================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 4.0 |============================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.7 |====================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox
Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 103.00 |================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 54.50 |=========================
CPUFreq Performance . 105.50 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 102.00 |===============================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome
ms < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 688.6 |==========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 1286.5 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 657.2 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 683.5 |==========================
Selenium
Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox
Score < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1298 |============================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 2365 |===================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 1234 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1391 |==============================
Selenium
Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome
Score > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .. 22145 |====================================================
CPUFreq Powersave . 13518 |================================
CPUFreq Schedutil . 21339 |==================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome
Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 36.52 |===============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 20.56 |==========================
CPUFreq Performance . 38.70 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 39.10 |==================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.3 |================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.7 |====================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 3.7 |=========================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.7 |====================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome
Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 143.00 |===============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 76.89 |=========================
CPUFreq Performance . 148.20 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 139.00 |==============================================
Selenium
Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome
Score < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1309 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 2456 |===================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 1304 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1346 |============================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 26.3 |=========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 52.8 |===================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 25.7 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 25.2 |========================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 356.6 |=========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 718.1 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 360.1 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 348.3 |========================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome
ms < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 27.18 |=========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 54.57 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 27.36 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 27.18 |=========================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome
ms < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 272.85 |========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 555.01 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 280.43 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 273.80 |========================
TSCP 1.81
AI Chess Performance
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1421630 |================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 667132 |=======================
CPUFreq Performance . 1341574 |=============================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1394766 |===============================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Multi Core
Score > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 11365 |==================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 7746 |==================================
CPUFreq Performance . 11375 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11207 |=================================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur
Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 794.7 |==================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 455.4 |=============================
CPUFreq Performance . 793.0 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 741.8 |===============================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection
images/sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 137.6 |=================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 74.7 |===========================
CPUFreq Performance . 135.2 |================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 139.4 |==================================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection
Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 240.2 |==================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 192.3 |========================================
CPUFreq Performance . 242.5 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 242.0 |==================================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Single Core
Score > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1440 |===================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 724 |==========================
CPUFreq Performance . 1444 |===================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1405 |==================================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur
Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 88.6 |===================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 44.2 |=========================
CPUFreq Performance . 88.6 |===================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 86.4 |==================================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection
images/sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 11.60 |==================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 5.72 |========================
CPUFreq Performance . 11.70 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.50 |=================================================
Geekbench 5
Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection
Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 33.2 |==================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 16.8 |==========================
CPUFreq Performance . 33.6 |===================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 32.6 |=================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 7.584 |=========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 14.975 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 7.528 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 7.661 |=========================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 6.902 |========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 14.031 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 7.037 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6.877 |========================
ASTC Encoder 2.0
Preset: Thorough
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 17.52 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 31.95 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 17.51 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 17.48 |===========================
ASTC Encoder 2.0
Preset: Exhaustive
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 138.85 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 252.14 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 138.91 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 138.82 |===========================
Hugin
Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 43.84 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 81.64 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 43.61 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 44.16 |===========================
OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg
Processing 60 Page PDF Document
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 20.88 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 38.71 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 20.39 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 20.43 |==========================
Open Porous Media
OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 12
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 303.32 |=============================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 508.17 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 304.27 |=============================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 304.21 |=============================
Tesseract OCR 4.1.1
Time To OCR 7 Images
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 22.79 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 42.68 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 22.55 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 22.51 |==========================
Tesseract 2014-05-12
Resolution: 3840 x 2160
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 315.78 |=============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 280.40 |========================================
CPUFreq Performance . 340.81 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 291.65 |==========================================
Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 484.61 |===============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 296.31 |=============================
CPUFreq Performance . 507.31 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 499.86 |================================================
Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 304.02 |==========================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 216.54 |==============================
CPUFreq Performance . 355.74 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 340.86 |===============================================
Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 276.41 |==========================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 197.73 |==============================
CPUFreq Performance . 322.58 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 312.77 |================================================
Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 237.51 |============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 171.90 |================================
CPUFreq Performance . 261.78 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 255.44 |================================================
TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23
Model: Inception V4
Microseconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1953663 |==========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 3562533 |================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 1952597 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1949273 |==========================
TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23
Model: Mobilenet Quant
Microseconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 94295.5 |==========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 173472.0 |===============================================
CPUFreq Performance . 94728.2 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 94400.8 |==========================
TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23
Model: Inception ResNet V2
Microseconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1758000 |==========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 3204470 |================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 1757590 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1754397 |==========================
NAMD 2.14
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1.48719 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 2.62037 |================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 1.49139 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1.48668 |===========================
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 194.38 |===============================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 310.32 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 188.87 |==============================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 194.83 |===============================
Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 438.28 |==============================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 711.99 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 430.40 |==============================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 423.25 |=============================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 56.23 |=============================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 97.44 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 55.55 |=============================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 56.92 |=============================
VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2
Speed: Speed 0
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 7.70 |================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.33 |===========================
CPUFreq Performance . 8.17 |===================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 8.14 |===================================================
VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2
Speed: Speed 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 25.95 |============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 15.96 |===========================
CPUFreq Performance . 29.40 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 28.71 |=================================================
x264 2019-12-17
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 140.66 |===============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 81.36 |===========================
CPUFreq Performance . 147.14 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 129.99 |===========================================
dav1d 0.7.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 198.57 |===============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 147.27 |===================================
CPUFreq Performance . 206.13 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 198.31 |===============================================
dav1d 0.7.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 543.61 |======================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 409.08 |=============================
CPUFreq Performance . 692.69 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 451.11 |================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.538 |=================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 2.595 |============================
CPUFreq Performance . 4.596 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.558 |==================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 36.86 |================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 21.40 |============================
CPUFreq Performance . 38.17 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 36.99 |================================================
x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 62.17 |=============================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 38.44 |============================
CPUFreq Performance . 69.36 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 43.71 |================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 41.90 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 76.68 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 41.93 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 41.98 |===========================
Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07
Mode: CPU
Ksamples > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 21642 |==================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 12637 |=============================
CPUFreq Performance . 21587 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 21664 |==================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 108.91 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 195.75 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 109.57 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 108.89 |===========================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 66.34 |==========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 124.55 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 66.17 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 66.65 |==========================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 40.18 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 74.93 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 40.11 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 39.87 |===========================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 8
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.516 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 8.378 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 4.507 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.573 |===========================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 10
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.327 |===========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 8.096 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 4.385 |===========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.333 |===========================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 152 |=========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 311 |====================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 154 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 154 |==========================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 8.09 |================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 12.60 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 6.43 |==========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12.50 |==================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: ac
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 5.82 |=========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 11.53 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 5.80 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.78 |=========================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: linpk
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 3.16 |===========================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 3.74 |===================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 3.14 |===========================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3.17 |===========================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: protein
Seconds < Lower Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 12.05 |=========================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 24.51 |==================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 12.03 |=========================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.79 |========================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 37.23 |==================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 36.92 |=================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 37.29 |==================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 37.49 |==================================================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160
MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 3732.44 |================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 3701.44 |===============================================
CPUFreq Performance . 3738.39 |================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3758.79 |================================================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 137.98 |=========================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 134.31 |========================================
CPUFreq Performance . 165.70 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 154.43 |==============================================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160
MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 2207.62 |========================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 2148.90 |=======================================
CPUFreq Performance . 2651.19 |================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2470.88 |=============================================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 149.95 |=================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 148.30 |================================================
CPUFreq Performance . 150.20 |=================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 150.61 |=================================================
ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160
MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better
CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1562.66 |================================================
CPUFreq Powersave ... 1545.49 |===============================================
CPUFreq Performance . 1565.25 |================================================
CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1569.49 |================================================