Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2008290-SYST-LINUX5962
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Audio Encoding 2 Tests
AV1 3 Tests
Web Browsers 1 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 10 Tests
CPU Massive 15 Tests
Creator Workloads 15 Tests
Desktop Graphics 3 Tests
Encoding 8 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 2 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Multi-Core 12 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 2 Tests
OCR 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 3 Tests
Python Tests 5 Tests
Renderers 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 11 Tests
Single-Threaded 4 Tests
Video Encoding 6 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
CPUFreq Ondemand
August 28 2020
  3 Hours, 59 Minutes
CPUFreq Powersave
August 28 2020
  5 Hours, 12 Minutes
CPUFreq Performance
August 29 2020
  4 Hours, 11 Minutes
CPUFreq Schedutil
August 29 2020
  4 Hours, 37 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  4 Hours, 30 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Linux 5.9 Frequency Scaling AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. CPUFreq Ondemand: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Powersave: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Performance: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Schedutil: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.94 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200827-generic (x86_64) 20200826, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.3.0-devel (git-31f75aa 2020-08-28 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1421630 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 667132 |======================= CPUFreq Performance . 1341574 |============================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1394766 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 26.3 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 52.8 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 25.7 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 25.2 |======================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 12.05 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 24.51 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 12.03 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.79 |======================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 356.6 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 718.1 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 360.1 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 348.3 |======================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 152 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 311 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 154 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 154 |========================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 11.60 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 5.72 |======================== CPUFreq Performance . 11.70 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.50 |================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 6.902 |======================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 14.031 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 7.037 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6.877 |======================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 272.85 |======================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 555.01 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 280.43 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 273.80 |======================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 27.18 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 54.57 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 27.36 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 27.18 |========================= Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 88.6 |=================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 44.2 |========================= CPUFreq Performance . 88.6 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 86.4 |================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 33.2 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 16.8 |========================== CPUFreq Performance . 33.6 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 32.6 |================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 5.82 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 11.53 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.80 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.78 |========================= Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1440 |=================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 724 |========================== CPUFreq Performance . 1444 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1405 |================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 7.584 |========================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 14.975 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 7.528 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 7.661 |========================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 8.09 |================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 12.60 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 6.43 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12.50 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 688.6 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 1286.5 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 657.2 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 683.5 |========================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 732.6 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 1352.6 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 694.6 |========================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 704.4 |========================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 103.00 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 54.50 |========================= CPUFreq Performance . 105.50 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 102.00 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 143.00 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 76.89 |========================= CPUFreq Performance . 148.20 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 139.00 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1298 |============================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 2365 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1234 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1391 |============================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 36.52 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 20.56 |========================== CPUFreq Performance . 38.70 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 39.10 |================================================== OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 20.88 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 38.71 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 20.39 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 20.43 |========================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 22.79 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 42.68 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 22.55 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 22.51 |========================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 7.70 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.33 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 8.17 |=================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 8.14 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Score < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1309 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 2456 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1304 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1346 |============================ libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 66.34 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 124.55 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 66.17 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 66.65 |========================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 40.18 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 74.93 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 40.11 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 39.87 |=========================== Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 43.84 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 81.64 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 43.61 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 44.16 |=========================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.327 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 8.096 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.385 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.333 |=========================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 137.6 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 74.7 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 135.2 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 139.4 |================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.516 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 8.378 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.507 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.573 |=========================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 25.95 |============================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 15.96 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 29.40 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 28.71 |================================================= TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 94295.5 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 173472.0 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 94728.2 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 94400.8 |========================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 41.90 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 76.68 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 41.93 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 41.98 |=========================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 17.52 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 31.95 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 17.51 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 17.48 |=========================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1953663 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 3562533 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1952597 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1949273 |========================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1758000 |========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 3204470 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1757590 |========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1754397 |========================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 138.85 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 252.14 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 138.91 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 138.82 |=========================== x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 140.66 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 81.36 |=========================== CPUFreq Performance . 147.14 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 129.99 |=========================================== x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 62.17 |============================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 38.44 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 69.36 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 43.71 |================================ Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 108.91 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 195.75 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 109.57 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 108.89 |=========================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 36.86 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 21.40 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 38.17 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 36.99 |================================================ SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.538 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 2.595 |============================ CPUFreq Performance . 4.596 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.558 |================================================== NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1.48719 |=========================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 2.62037 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1.49139 |=========================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1.48668 |=========================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 56.23 |============================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 97.44 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 55.55 |============================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 56.92 |============================= Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 794.7 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 455.4 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 793.0 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 741.8 |=============================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 21642 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 12637 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 21587 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 21664 |================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 484.61 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 296.31 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 507.31 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 499.86 |================================================ dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 543.61 |====================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 409.08 |============================= CPUFreq Performance . 692.69 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 451.11 |================================ Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 438.28 |============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 711.99 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 430.40 |============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 423.25 |============================= Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 12 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 303.32 |============================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 508.17 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 304.27 |============================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 304.21 |============================= WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 194.38 |=============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 310.32 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 188.87 |============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 194.83 |=============================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 304.02 |========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 216.54 |============================== CPUFreq Performance . 355.74 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 340.86 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .. 22145 |==================================================== CPUFreq Powersave . 13518 |================================ CPUFreq Schedutil . 21339 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 13599 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 8478 |=============================== CPUFreq Performance . 13841 |================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 276.41 |========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 197.73 |============================== CPUFreq Performance . 322.58 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 312.77 |================================================ Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 229.01 |============================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 371.59 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 228.98 |============================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 230.20 |============================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 85.4 |========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 62.5 |=============================== CPUFreq Performance . 101.0 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 79.3 |======================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 237.51 |============================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 171.90 |================================ CPUFreq Performance . 261.78 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 255.44 |================================================ Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 11365 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 7746 |================================== CPUFreq Performance . 11375 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11207 |================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 198.57 |=============================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 147.27 |=================================== CPUFreq Performance . 206.13 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 198.31 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.3 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.7 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 3.7 |========================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.7 |==================================================== Geekbench 5 Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 240.2 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 192.3 |======================================== CPUFreq Performance . 242.5 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 242.0 |================================================== Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 315.78 |============================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 280.40 |======================================== CPUFreq Performance . 340.81 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 291.65 |========================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 3.16 |=========================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 3.74 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 3.14 |=========================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3.17 |=========================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 4.4 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 4.7 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.0 |============================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.7 |==================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 149.95 |================================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 148.30 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 150.20 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 150.61 |================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 1562.66 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 1545.49 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1565.25 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1569.49 |================================================ ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 3732.44 |================================================ CPUFreq Powersave ... 3701.44 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 3738.39 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3758.79 |================================================ ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 37.23 |================================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 36.92 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 37.29 |================================================== CPUFreq Schedutil ... 37.49 |================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 2207.62 |======================================== CPUFreq Powersave ... 2148.90 |======================================= CPUFreq Performance . 2651.19 |================================================ CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2470.88 |============================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Ondemand .... 137.98 |========================================= CPUFreq Powersave ... 134.31 |======================================== CPUFreq Performance . 165.70 |================================================= CPUFreq Schedutil ... 154.43 |==============================================