x1_extreme_cpu_mem
Lenovo X1 Extreme gen2 (20QVCTO1WW)


x1 extreme gen2 vs t14: 

	Processor: Intel Core i9-9880H @ 4.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: LENOVO 20QVCTO1WW (N2OET47P 1.34 BIOS), Memory: 32GB, Disk: 1024GB SAMSUNG MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7, Graphics: i915drmfb, Audio: Conexant Generic

	OS: Debian GNU/Linux 10, Kernel: 5.8.3-gentoo (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: btrfs, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 25941.98 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 24372.02 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 24418.11 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 25467.32 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 25533.61 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 25612.72 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 24456.59 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 24460.83 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 25620.99 |============================================


RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 25108.21 |============================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 28147.5 |=============================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 21124.3 |=============================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 23212.7 |=============================================


Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 23149.3 |=============================================


Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memcpy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 18344.0 |=============================================


Tinymembench 2018-05-28
Standard Memset
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 36322.5 |=============================================


MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 15173.86 |============================================


MBW 2018-09-08
Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 10401.37 |============================================


t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 14.58 |===============================================


t-test1 2017-01-13
Threads: 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 5.199 |===============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 2510.73 |=============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1127.58 |=============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1640.49 |=============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1755.97 |=============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 6207.84 |=============================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1821.75 |=============================================


Bork File Encrypter 1.4
File Encryption Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 6.053 |===============================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: H2
msec < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 2842 |================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 4536 |================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 5705 |================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradebeans
msec < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 3611 |================================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Scala Dotty
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1475.89 |=============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Random Forest
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1743.28 |=============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark ALS
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 2191.64 |=============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark Bayes
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 494.06 |==============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Savina Reactors.IO
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 14038.87 |============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Apache Spark PageRank
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 3075.44 |=============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Twitter HTTP Requests
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 2841.13 |=============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: In-Memory Database Shootout
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 3055.75 |=============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 8662.73 |=============================================


Renaissance 0.10.0
Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures
ms < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1699.53 |=============================================


CacheBench
Read Cache
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 3961.59 |=============================================


CacheBench
Write Cache
MB/s > Higher Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 31998.01 |============================================


Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 101.54 |==============================================


Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
x1 extreme gen2 vs t14 . 1.748 |===============================================