10900K Intel Core i9-10900K testing with a Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS) and Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2008183-SYST-10900K629 .
10900K Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server Display Driver OpenGL OpenCL Vulkan Compiler File-System Screen Resolution ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads) Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS) Intel Comet Lake PCH 16GB Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB Gigabyte AMD Radeon RX 5500/5500M / Pro 5500M 8GB (1890/875MHz) Realtek ALC1220 DELL P2415Q Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 Ubuntu 20.04 5.8.1-050801-generic (x86_64) GNOME Shell 3.36.3 X Server 1.20.8 modesetting 1.20.8 4.6 Mesa 20.2.0-devel (git-ef67218 2020-07-07 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 10.0.1) OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 20.2.0-devel (git-c977567db6) 1.2.131 GCC 9.3.0 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Processor Details - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xc8 Java Details - OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.8+10-post-Ubuntu-0ubuntu120.04) Security Details - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
10900K sockperf: Throughput sockperf: Latency Ping Pong sockperf: Latency Under Load blosc: blosclz java-scimark2: Composite java-scimark2: Monte Carlo java-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform java-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply java-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization java-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation bork: File Encryption Time scimark2: Composite scimark2: Monte Carlo scimark2: Fast Fourier Transform scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiply scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorization scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation crafty: Elapsed Time tscp: AI Chess Performance c-ray: Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel smallpt: Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples sudokut: Total Time astcenc: Fast astcenc: Medium astcenc: Thorough astcenc: Exhaustive basis: ETC1S basis: UASTC Level 0 basis: UASTC Level 2 basis: UASTC Level 3 basis: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing optcarrot: Optimized Benchmark sunflow: Global Illumination + Image Synthesis ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 750326 3.391 18.885 9506.4 3050.38 1258.23 1930.35 2788.21 7280.58 1994.52 5.139 808.73 175.52 363.56 907.83 1152.53 1444.20 10060662 1618046 52.109 7.872 8.980 4.72 6.88 21.26 169.48 43.000 6.469 25.180 46.457 574.379 181.64 0.793 733184 3.411 18.814 9520.3 3037.76 1258.41 1929.27 2789.14 7216.82 1995.17 5.196 808.37 175.48 365.52 906.95 1150.21 1443.70 10005446 1619957 52.143 7.885 8.996 4.73 6.90 21.24 169.58 43.281 6.476 25.175 46.453 575.081 180.04 0.814 789868 3.220 16.157 9497.9 3164.28 1301.80 1998.36 2879.76 7578.90 2062.57 5.099 831.93 180.99 366.14 935.91 1187.43 1489.18 10346440 1673101 52.101 7.904 8.618 4.66 6.80 21.24 169.55 42.293 6.318 25.060 46.335 575.110 186.57 0.804 OpenBenchmarking.org
Sockperf Test: Throughput OpenBenchmarking.org Messages Per Second, More Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Throughput ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 200K 400K 600K 800K 1000K SE +/- 6915.14, N = 25 SE +/- 10363.09, N = 20 SE +/- 7016.01, N = 11 750326 733184 789868
Sockperf Test: Latency Ping Pong OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 0.7675 1.535 2.3025 3.07 3.8375 SE +/- 0.032, N = 5 SE +/- 0.018, N = 5 SE +/- 0.041, N = 5 3.391 3.411 3.220
Sockperf Test: Latency Under Load OpenBenchmarking.org usec, Fewer Is Better Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.11, N = 5 SE +/- 0.08, N = 5 SE +/- 1.17, N = 20 18.89 18.81 16.16
C-Blosc Compressor: blosclz OpenBenchmarking.org MB/s, More Is Better C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K SE +/- 10.65, N = 3 SE +/- 10.47, N = 3 SE +/- 3.76, N = 3 9506.4 9520.3 9497.9
Java SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 700 1400 2100 2800 3500 SE +/- 1.96, N = 4 SE +/- 14.93, N = 4 SE +/- 5.31, N = 4 3050.38 3037.76 3164.28
Java SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.11, N = 4 SE +/- 0.00, N = 4 SE +/- 0.37, N = 4 1258.23 1258.41 1301.80
Java SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 7.22, N = 4 SE +/- 6.42, N = 4 SE +/- 7.60, N = 4 1930.35 1929.27 1998.36
Java SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 600 1200 1800 2400 3000 SE +/- 1.52, N = 4 SE +/- 1.30, N = 4 SE +/- 6.79, N = 4 2788.21 2789.14 2879.76
Java SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 1600 3200 4800 6400 8000 SE +/- 6.07, N = 4 SE +/- 74.80, N = 4 SE +/- 27.12, N = 4 7280.58 7216.82 7578.90
Java SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 400 800 1200 1600 2000 SE +/- 0.65, N = 4 SE +/- 0.57, N = 4 SE +/- 0.93, N = 4 1994.52 1995.17 2062.57
Bork File Encrypter File Encryption Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 1.1691 2.3382 3.5073 4.6764 5.8455 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.016, N = 3 5.139 5.196 5.099
SciMark Computational Test: Composite OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 SE +/- 0.52, N = 3 808.73 808.37 831.93
SciMark Computational Test: Monte Carlo OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 175.52 175.48 180.99
SciMark Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 2.36, N = 3 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 SE +/- 0.89, N = 3 363.56 365.52 366.14
SciMark Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 200 400 600 800 1000 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.51, N = 3 SE +/- 1.45, N = 3 907.83 906.95 935.91
SciMark Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 SE +/- 0.73, N = 3 1152.53 1150.21 1187.43
SciMark Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation OpenBenchmarking.org Mflops, More Is Better SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 300 600 900 1200 1500 SE +/- 0.21, N = 3 SE +/- 0.37, N = 3 SE +/- 0.55, N = 3 1444.20 1443.70 1489.18
Crafty Elapsed Time OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 2M 4M 6M 8M 10M SE +/- 10784.33, N = 3 SE +/- 22819.93, N = 3 SE +/- 22769.64, N = 3 10060662 10005446 10346440
TSCP AI Chess Performance OpenBenchmarking.org Nodes Per Second, More Is Better TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 400K 800K 1200K 1600K 2000K SE +/- 2421.87, N = 5 SE +/- 3006.78, N = 5 SE +/- 2959.80, N = 5 1618046 1619957 1673101
C-Ray Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 12 24 36 48 60 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 52.11 52.14 52.10
Smallpt Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.005, N = 3 SE +/- 0.006, N = 3 SE +/- 0.010, N = 3 7.872 7.885 7.904
Sudokut Total Time OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sudokut 0.4 Total Time ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.014, N = 3 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 SE +/- 0.008, N = 3 8.980 8.996 8.618
ASTC Encoder Preset: Fast OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Fast ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 1.0643 2.1286 3.1929 4.2572 5.3215 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.72 4.73 4.66
ASTC Encoder Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Medium ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.88 6.90 6.80
ASTC Encoder Preset: Thorough OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 21.26 21.24 21.24
ASTC Encoder Preset: Exhaustive OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 169.48 169.58 169.55
Basis Universal Settings: ETC1S OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.46, N = 3 SE +/- 0.25, N = 3 SE +/- 0.08, N = 3 43.00 43.28 42.29
Basis Universal Settings: UASTC Level 0 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 SE +/- 0.004, N = 3 6.469 6.476 6.318
Basis Universal Settings: UASTC Level 2 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 25.18 25.18 25.06
Basis Universal Settings: UASTC Level 3 OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 46.46 46.45 46.34
Basis Universal Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 120 240 360 480 600 SE +/- 0.26, N = 3 SE +/- 0.29, N = 3 SE +/- 0.14, N = 3 574.38 575.08 575.11
Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 1.70, N = 4 SE +/- 0.34, N = 4 SE +/- 0.44, N = 4 181.64 180.04 186.57 1. ruby 2.7.0p0 (2019-12-25 revision 647ee6f091) [x86_64-linux-gnu]
Sunflow Rendering System Global Illumination + Image Synthesis OpenBenchmarking.org Seconds, Fewer Is Better Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis ic 1 ic 2 ic 3 0.1832 0.3664 0.5496 0.7328 0.916 SE +/- 0.002, N = 3 SE +/- 0.011, N = 4 SE +/- 0.003, N = 3 0.793 0.814 0.804
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.4