test
test


test: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-9700 @ 4.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Mouse NB5xTG, Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST1000LM048-2E71 + 256GB KINGSTON RBUSNS8, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce MX250 2048MB (1518/3003MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC269VC, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel Wireless-AC 9560

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-42-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 440.95.01, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080

NVIDIA GeForce MX250: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-9700 @ 4.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Mouse NB5xTG, Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH Shared SRAM, Memory: 16384MB, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST1000LM048-2E71 + 256GB KINGSTON RBUSNS8, Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce MX250 2048MB (1518/3003MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC269VC, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel Wireless-AC 9560

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-42-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Driver: NVIDIA 440.95.01, OpenGL: 4.6.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


GpuTest 0.7.0
Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen
Points > Higher Is Better
test . 1648 |==================================================================
test . 1620 |=================================================================


QGears2
XRender + Text
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 . 89.12 |=================================================


QGears2
XRender + Gears
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 . 303.65 |================================================


QGears2
XRender + Image Scaling
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 . 996.91 |================================================


Render Bench
Phoronix Test Suite v5.2.1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 . 14.28 |=================================================