AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core testing with a Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2008144-NE-AMDRYZENU43
AMD Ryzen Ubuntu Linux
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core testing with a Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Ryzen 5 2600:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core @ 3.40GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-42-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
SQLite 3.30.1
Threads / Copies: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 52.74 |=========================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 46.3 |==========================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 47.2 |==========================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 69.4 |==========================================================
FS-Mark 3.3
Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync
Files/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2137.4 |========================================================
IOR 3.2.1
Write Test
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 100.25 |========================================================
IOR 3.2.1
Read Test
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 552.26 |========================================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Compile
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 222.51 |========================================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Initial Create
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 225.30 |========================================================
Compile Bench 0.6
Test: Read Compiled Tree
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 526.51 |========================================================
PostMark 1.51
Disk Transaction Performance
TPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5952 |==========================================================
Sockperf 3.4
Test: Throughput
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 449508 |========================================================
Sockperf 3.4
Test: Latency Ping Pong
usec < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.291 |=========================================================
Sockperf 3.4
Test: Latency Under Load
usec < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.61 |=========================================================
WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 286.97 |========================================================
C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5
Compressor: blosclz
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8985.8 |========================================================
High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1
GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.18340 |=======================================================
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 373.36 |========================================================
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 106.56 |========================================================
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 156.93 |========================================================
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.83 |=========================================================
Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Streamcluster
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 21.16 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: ac
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 7.07 |==========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: air
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.84 |==========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: mdbx
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.08 |==========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: doduc
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.54 |==========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: linpk
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.64 |==========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: tfft2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 24.09 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: aermod
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.77 |==========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: rnflow
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.55 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: induct2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 22.66 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: protein
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.81 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: capacita
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.12 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: channel2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 57.1 |==========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: fatigue2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 57.29 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: gas_dyn2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 58.02 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: test_fpu2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 34.12 |=========================================================
Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks
Benchmark: mp_prop_design
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 68.14 |=========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 34 |============================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 102 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 465 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1233 |==========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 86 |============================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1363 |==========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 88 |============================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 432 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 444 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 522 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 183 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 613 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 222 |===========================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1078 |==========================================================
Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 3.340 |=========================================================
libgav1 2019-10-05
Video Input: Chimera 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 31.68 |=========================================================
libgav1 2019-10-05
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.50 |=========================================================
libgav1 2019-10-05
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 52.18 |=========================================================
libgav1 2019-10-05
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.04 |=========================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2356.81 |=======================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1463.38 |=======================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1684.28 |=======================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2378.05 |=======================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 4679.82 |=======================================================
Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1578.50 |=======================================================
Bork File Encrypter 1.4
File Encryption Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 11.23 |=========================================================
DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: H2
msec < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 3844 |==========================================================
DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5533 |==========================================================
DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6075 |==========================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2700.79 |=======================================================
CacheBench
Test: Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 26721.49 |======================================================
CacheBench
Test: Read / Modify / Write
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 50484.59 |======================================================
Zstd Compression 1.4.5
Compression Level: 3
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 3079.3 |========================================================
Zstd Compression 1.4.5
Compression Level: 19
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 21.3 |==========================================================
Crafty 25.2
Elapsed Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6711284 |=======================================================
TSCP 1.81
AI Chess Performance
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1024530 |=======================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Swirl
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 302 |===========================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Rotate
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 607 |===========================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Sharpen
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 83 |============================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Enhanced
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 117 |===========================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Resizing
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 631 |===========================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: Noise-Gaussian
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 160 |===========================================================
GraphicsMagick 1.3.33
Operation: HWB Color Space
Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 818 |===========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.58 |=========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 145.75 |========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.40666 |=======================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 102.60 |========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 20.81 |=========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 11.91 |=========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 19.49 |=========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 20.30 |=========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 17.64 |=========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.60 |=========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 751.12 |========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 246.44 |========================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.96240 |=======================================================
oneDNN 1.5
Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.33648 |=======================================================
dav1d 0.7.0
Video Input: Chimera 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 315.40 |========================================================
dav1d 0.7.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 98.97 |=========================================================
dav1d 0.7.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 292.00 |========================================================
dav1d 0.7.0
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 78.89 |=========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.73 |==========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.19 |==========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.56 |==========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.85 |==========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.64 |==========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.97 |==========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.76 |==========================================================
OSPray 1.8.5
Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 76.92 |=========================================================
TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b
Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 265.85 |========================================================
AOM AV1 2.0
Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.2 |===========================================================
AOM AV1 2.0
Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.66 |==========================================================
AOM AV1 2.0
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.39 |=========================================================
AOM AV1 2.0
Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.70 |==========================================================
AOM AV1 2.0
Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 26.0 |==========================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.3219 |========================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.8128 |========================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 7.1962 |========================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.5540 |========================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.8655 |========================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.1014 |========================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.078 |=========================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.727 |=========================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.22 |=========================================================
SVT-HEVC 1.4.1
1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 30.66 |=========================================================
SVT-VP9 0.1
Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 88.40 |=========================================================
SVT-VP9 0.1
Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 93.22 |=========================================================
SVT-VP9 0.1
Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 73.86 |=========================================================
VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2
Speed: Speed 0
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.34 |==========================================================
VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2
Speed: Speed 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.97 |=========================================================
x264 2019-12-17
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 55.10 |=========================================================
x265 3.1.2
H.265 1080p Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.01 |=========================================================
Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0
Scene: Memorial
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.60 |==========================================================
OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmark
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 79.3 |==========================================================
OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8115378.39 |====================================================
OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 31669400.48 |===================================================
OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1229819.70 |====================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.3
Scene: DLSC
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.08 |==========================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.3
Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.11 |==========================================================
7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 30746 |=========================================================
Swet 1.5.16
Average
Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 646081306 |=====================================================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 138.23 |========================================================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 83.34 |=========================================================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 8
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.758 |=========================================================
libavif avifenc 0.7.3
Encoder Speed: 10
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.322 |=========================================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.30 |=========================================================
Timed Clash Compilation
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 318.11 |========================================================
Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 94.46 |=========================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1560.15 |=======================================================
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 160.26 |========================================================
Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.36 |=========================================================
Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 145.25 |========================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1127.38 |=======================================================
Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 64.00 |=========================================================
Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 93.78 |=========================================================
Build2 0.12
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 186.98 |========================================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 98.15 |=========================================================
Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12
256MB File Compression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.986 |=========================================================
POV-Ray 3.7.0.7
Trace Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 76.83 |=========================================================
Smallpt 1.0
Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 17.47 |=========================================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Hair
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 41.57 |=========================================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Water Caustic
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 38.54 |=========================================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Non-Exponential
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 12.72 |=========================================================
Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2
Scene: Volumetric Caustic
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.93 |=========================================================
YafaRay 3.4.1
Total Time For Sample Scene
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 242.79 |========================================================
Open Porous Media
OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 405.28 |========================================================
Open Porous Media
OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 265.20 |========================================================
Open Porous Media
OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 4
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 183.70 |========================================================
Open Porous Media
OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 6
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 191.00 |========================================================
rays1bench 2020-01-09
Large Scene
mrays/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 24.45 |=========================================================
AOBench
Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 38.51 |=========================================================
Gzip Compression
Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 39.26 |=========================================================
XZ Compression 5.2.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 46.29 |=========================================================
dcraw
RAW To PPM Image Conversion
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.36 |=========================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.57 |=========================================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.034 |=========================================================
Ogg Encoding 1.3.3
WAV To Ogg
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.210 |=========================================================
FFmpeg 4.0.2
H.264 HD To NTSC DV
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.541 |=========================================================
Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0
Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 96.45 |=========================================================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Pod2html
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.16253846 |====================================================
Perl Benchmarks
Test: Interpreter
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.00169958 |====================================================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: Serial
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 803.74 |========================================================
Radiance Benchmark 5.0
Test: SMP Parallel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 263.19 |========================================================
Sudokut 0.4
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.98 |=========================================================
System XZ Decompression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.254 |=========================================================
Tachyon 0.99b6
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 155.25 |========================================================
libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2
Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 160.15 |========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Hot Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.951 |=========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Fill Sync
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.4 |===========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Fill Sync
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 3568.25 |=======================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Overwrite
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.5 |==========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Overwrite
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 91.61 |=========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Fill
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.5 |==========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 91.40 |=========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Read
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.940 |=========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Seek Random
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.749 |=========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Random Delete
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 82.26 |=========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.7 |==========================================================
LevelDB 1.22
Benchmark: Sequential Fill
Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 90.34 |=========================================================
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite
Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping
Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 582.12 |========================================================
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite
Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image
Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 23614.44 |======================================================
Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite
Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster
Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 904.61 |========================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: ETC1S
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 63.74 |=========================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.979 |=========================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.66 |=========================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 95.67 |=========================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 743.93 |========================================================
SQLite Speedtest 3.30
Timed Time - Size 1,000
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 78.13 |=========================================================
Darktable 3.0.1
Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.09 |=========================================================
Darktable 3.0.1
Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.18 |=========================================================
Darktable 3.0.1
Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.220 |=========================================================
Darktable 3.0.1
Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 11.08 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Crop
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.47 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Scale
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 7.416 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Cartoon
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 107.79 |========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Reflect
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 35.64 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Antialias
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 45.75 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Tile Glass
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 35.95 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Wavelet Blur
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 72.16 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Color Enhance
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 68.49 |=========================================================
GEGL
Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 46.45 |=========================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: resize
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.92 |=========================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: rotate
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.60 |=========================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: auto-levels
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.15 |=========================================================
GIMP 2.10.18
Test: unsharp-mask
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 17.57 |=========================================================
G'MIC
Test: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 Times
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 128.56 |========================================================
G'MIC
Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 23.96 |=========================================================
G'MIC
Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 92.64 |=========================================================
Hugin
Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 63.30 |=========================================================
Inkscape
Operation: SVG Files To PNG
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 31.65 |=========================================================
LibreOffice
Test: 20 Documents To PDF
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.530 |=========================================================
OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg
Processing 60 Page PDF Document
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 40.70 |=========================================================
RawTherapee
Total Benchmark Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 76.53 |=========================================================
librsvg
Operation: SVG Files To PNG
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 38.01 |=========================================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2158757.83 |====================================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1709680.08 |====================================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1250248.70 |====================================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2184755.5 |=====================================================
Redis 5.0.5
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1537751.62 |====================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.50 |==========================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.17 |==========================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1543.15 |=======================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 12.28 |=========================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.59 |==========================================================
PlaidML
FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Inception V3 - Device: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.06 |==========================================================
ctx_clock
Context Switch Time
Clocks < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 170 |===========================================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: Memory
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8348899.57 |====================================================
Sysbench 2018-07-28
Test: CPU
Events Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 11300.01 |======================================================
Optcarrot
Optimized Benchmark
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 93.49 |=========================================================
Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07
Mode: CPU
Ksamples > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 8612 |==========================================================
IndigoBench 4.0.64
Scene: Bedroom
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.869 |=========================================================
IndigoBench 4.0.64
Scene: Supercar
M samples/s > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.846 |=========================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 287.57 |========================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 793.68 |========================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 433.10 |========================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1044.23 |=======================================================
ECP-CANDLE 0.3
Benchmark: P1B2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 50.68 |=========================================================
ECP-CANDLE 0.3
Benchmark: P3B1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1170.53 |=======================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: go
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 317 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: 2to3
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 417 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: chaos
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 146 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 142 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: nbody
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 165 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pathlib
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 22.8 |==========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: raytrace
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 622 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: json_loads
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.2 |==========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 130 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 211 |===========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.8 |==========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: django_template
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 71.8 |==========================================================
PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 653 |===========================================================
NeatBench 5
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.95 |==========================================================
NeatBench 5
Acceleration: CPU
FPS > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.79 |==========================================================
Apache Benchmark 2.4.29
Static Web Page Serving
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 25025.67 |======================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Emily
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 612.87 |========================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Disney Material
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 385.56 |========================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Material Tester
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 333.37 |========================================================
PHPBench 0.8.1
PHP Benchmark Suite
Score > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 509605 |========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 54.61 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 971.6 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox
Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 28507 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox
Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 67.3 |==========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 79.27 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.4 |===========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox
Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 67.6 |==========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 26.72 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 990.3 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome
Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 37627 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox
Score < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1784 |==========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome
Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 27.5 |==========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome
Score > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 107.18 |========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.9 |===========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome
Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 94.49 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome
Score < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 1934 |==========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 33.9 |==========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 464.4 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 45.03 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome
ms < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 369.46 |========================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_ica
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 72.15 |=========================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_qda
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 73.17 |=========================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_svm
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 22.27 |=========================================================
Mlpack Benchmark
Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.78 |==========================================================
PHP Micro Benchmarks
Test: Zend bench
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.470 |=========================================================
PHP Micro Benchmarks
Test: Zend micro_bench
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.059 |=========================================================
Scikit-Learn 0.22.1
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 12.35 |=========================================================
Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2
Global Illumination + Image Synthesis
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.044 |=========================================================
Tesseract OCR 4.1.1
Time To OCR 7 Images
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 29.89 |=========================================================
BRL-CAD 7.30.8
VGR Performance Metric
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 66678 |=========================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Files
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.45 |=========================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Threads
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.84 |=========================================================
OSBench
Test: Launch Programs
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 48.72 |=========================================================
OSBench
Test: Create Processes
us Per Event < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 30.55 |=========================================================
OSBench
Test: Memory Allocations
Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better
Ryzen 5 2600 . 88.97 |=========================================================