AMD Ryzen Ubuntu Linux AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core testing with a Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS) and HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Ryzen 5 2600: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600 Six-Core @ 3.40GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte A320M-S2H-CF (F52a BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 240GB TOSHIBA RC100, Graphics: HIS AMD Radeon HD 7750/8740 / R7 250E 1GB, Audio: AMD Oland/Hainan/Cape, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-42-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 52.74 |========================================================= FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 46.3 |========================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 5000 Files, 1MB Size, 4 Threads Files/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 47.2 |========================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 4000 Files, 32 Sub Dirs, 1MB Size Files/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 69.4 |========================================================== FS-Mark 3.3 Test: 1000 Files, 1MB Size, No Sync/FSync Files/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2137.4 |======================================================== IOR 3.2.1 Write Test MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 100.25 |======================================================== IOR 3.2.1 Read Test MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 552.26 |======================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Compile MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 222.51 |======================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Initial Create MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 225.30 |======================================================== Compile Bench 0.6 Test: Read Compiled Tree MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 526.51 |======================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5952 |========================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 449508 |======================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.291 |========================================================= Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.61 |========================================================= WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 286.97 |======================================================== C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8985.8 |======================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.18340 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 373.36 |======================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 106.56 |======================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 156.93 |======================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.83 |========================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 21.16 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 7.07 |========================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.84 |========================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.08 |========================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.54 |========================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.64 |========================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 24.09 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.77 |========================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.55 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 22.66 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.81 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.12 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 57.1 |========================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 57.29 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 58.02 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 34.12 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 68.14 |========================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 34 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 102 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 465 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1233 |========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 86 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1363 |========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 88 |============================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 432 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 444 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 522 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 183 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 613 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 222 |=========================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1078 |========================================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 3.340 |========================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 31.68 |========================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.50 |========================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 52.18 |========================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.04 |========================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2356.81 |======================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1463.38 |======================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1684.28 |======================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2378.05 |======================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4679.82 |======================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1578.50 |======================================================= Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 11.23 |========================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 3844 |========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5533 |========================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6075 |========================================================== CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2700.79 |======================================================= CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 26721.49 |====================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 50484.59 |====================================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 3079.3 |======================================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 21.3 |========================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6711284 |======================================================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1024530 |======================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 302 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 607 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 83 |============================================================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 117 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 631 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 160 |=========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 818 |=========================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.58 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 145.75 |======================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.40666 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 102.60 |======================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 20.81 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 11.91 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 19.49 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 20.30 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 17.64 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.60 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 751.12 |======================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 246.44 |======================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.96240 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.33648 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 315.40 |======================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 98.97 |========================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 292.00 |======================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 78.89 |========================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.73 |========================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.19 |========================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.56 |========================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.85 |========================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.64 |========================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.97 |========================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.76 |========================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 76.92 |========================================================= TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 265.85 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.2 |=========================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.66 |========================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.39 |========================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.70 |========================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 26.0 |========================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.3219 |======================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.8128 |======================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 7.1962 |======================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.5540 |======================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.8655 |======================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.1014 |======================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.078 |========================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.727 |========================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.22 |========================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.4.1 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 30.66 |========================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 88.40 |========================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 93.22 |========================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 73.86 |========================================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.34 |========================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.97 |========================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 55.10 |========================================================= x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.01 |========================================================= Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.60 |========================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 79.3 |========================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8115378.39 |==================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 31669400.48 |=================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1229819.70 |==================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.08 |========================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.11 |========================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 30746 |========================================================= Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 646081306 |===================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 138.23 |======================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 83.34 |========================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.758 |========================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.322 |========================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.30 |========================================================= Timed Clash Compilation Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 318.11 |======================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 94.46 |========================================================= Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1560.15 |======================================================= Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 160.26 |======================================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.36 |========================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 145.25 |======================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1127.38 |======================================================= Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 64.00 |========================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 93.78 |========================================================= Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 186.98 |======================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 98.15 |========================================================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.986 |========================================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 76.83 |========================================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 17.47 |========================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 41.57 |========================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 38.54 |========================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 12.72 |========================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.93 |========================================================= YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 242.79 |======================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 405.28 |======================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 265.20 |======================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 4 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 183.70 |======================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 191.00 |======================================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 24.45 |========================================================= AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 38.51 |========================================================= Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 39.26 |========================================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 46.29 |========================================================= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.36 |========================================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.57 |========================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.034 |========================================================= Ogg Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.210 |========================================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.541 |========================================================= Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 96.45 |========================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.16253846 |==================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.00169958 |==================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 803.74 |======================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 263.19 |======================================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.98 |========================================================= System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.254 |========================================================= Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 155.25 |======================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 160.15 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.951 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.4 |=========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 3568.25 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.5 |========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 91.61 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.5 |========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 91.40 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.940 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.749 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 82.26 |========================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.7 |========================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 90.34 |========================================================= Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 582.12 |======================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 23614.44 |====================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 904.61 |======================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 63.74 |========================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.979 |========================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 49.66 |========================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 95.67 |========================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 743.93 |======================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 78.13 |========================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.09 |========================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 13.18 |========================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.220 |========================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 11.08 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.47 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 7.416 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 107.79 |======================================================== GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 35.64 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 45.75 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 35.95 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 72.16 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 68.49 |========================================================= GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 46.45 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 10.92 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.60 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 15.15 |========================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 17.57 |========================================================= G'MIC Test: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 128.56 |======================================================== G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 23.96 |========================================================= G'MIC Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 92.64 |========================================================= Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 63.30 |========================================================= Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 31.65 |========================================================= LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8.530 |========================================================= OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 40.70 |========================================================= RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 76.53 |========================================================= librsvg Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 38.01 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2158757.83 |==================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1709680.08 |==================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1250248.70 |==================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2184755.5 |===================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1537751.62 |==================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.50 |========================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.17 |========================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: IMDB LSTM - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1543.15 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 12.28 |========================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.59 |========================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Inception V3 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 6.06 |========================================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 170 |=========================================================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8348899.57 |==================================================== Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 11300.01 |====================================================== Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 93.49 |========================================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 8612 |========================================================== IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.869 |========================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1.846 |========================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 287.57 |======================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 793.68 |======================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 433.10 |======================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1044.23 |======================================================= ECP-CANDLE 0.3 Benchmark: P1B2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 50.68 |========================================================= ECP-CANDLE 0.3 Benchmark: P3B1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1170.53 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 317 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 417 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 146 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 142 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 165 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 22.8 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 622 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 32.2 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 130 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 211 |=========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.8 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 71.8 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 653 |=========================================================== NeatBench 5 FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.95 |========================================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 9.79 |========================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 25025.67 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 612.87 |======================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 385.56 |======================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 333.37 |======================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 509605 |======================================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 54.61 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 971.6 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 28507 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 67.3 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 79.27 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 5.4 |=========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 67.6 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 26.72 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 990.3 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 37627 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1784 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 27.5 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 107.18 |======================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.9 |=========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 94.49 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Score < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 1934 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 33.9 |========================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 464.4 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 45.03 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 369.46 |======================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 72.15 |========================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 73.17 |========================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 22.27 |========================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 4.78 |========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 0.470 |========================================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.059 |========================================================= Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 12.35 |========================================================= Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 2.044 |========================================================= Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 29.89 |========================================================= BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 66678 |========================================================= OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 16.45 |========================================================= OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 14.84 |========================================================= OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 48.72 |========================================================= OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 30.55 |========================================================= OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better Ryzen 5 2600 . 88.97 |=========================================================