Eccles_Limited_Benchmark_run
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 testing with a Intel S2600WFT (SE5C620.86B.00.01.0014.070920180847 BIOS) and ASPEED 32GB on Debian 9.13 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 @ 4.20GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Intel S2600WFT (SE5C620.86B.00.01.0014.070920180847 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB + 64 GB + 32 GB DDR4-2666MHz, Disk: 2 x 960GB INTEL SSDSCKJB96 + 16 x 1920GB INTEL SSDSC2KB01, Graphics: ASPEED 32GB, Audio: NVIDIA Device 10f2, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 10GBASE-T + 2 x Intel X722 for 10GbE SFP+

	OS: Debian 9.13, Kernel: 4.9.0-13-amd64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.19.2, Display Driver: fbdev 0.4.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.0 pocl 0.13 LLVM 3.8.1 + OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.1.133, Compiler: GCC 6.3.0 20170516 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768


IPC_benchmark
Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128
Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 1205438 |==================================


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 10.39 |====================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 156.75 |===================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 4.21412 |==================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 32.73 |====================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 4.43999 |==================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 7.04823 |==================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 0.01987 |==================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 1.40368 |==================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 0.81378 |==================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 16201.06 |=================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 7598727.76 |===============================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 777.91 |===================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 897.02 |===================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 901.94 |===================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 735.55 |===================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 438.27 |===================================


Tensorflow
Build: Cifar10
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 57.94 |====================================


CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Atol
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 66.94 |====================================


CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Ctype
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 30.75 |====================================


CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Math Library
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 438.34 |===================================


CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Random Numbers
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 1021.35 |==================================


CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Vector
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 90.43 |====================================


CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Function Objects
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 15.49 |====================================


CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Abstraction
Seconds < Lower Is Better
ASPEED - 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6146 . 34.73 |====================================