hpc-run-1
KVM testing on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


optimized-flavor-and-image: 

	Processor: Intel Core (8 Cores), Motherboard: RDO OpenStack Compute (1.11.0-2.el7 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9, Memory: 26GB, Disk: 21GB QEMU HDD + 86GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Red Hat Virtio GPU, Network: Red Hat Virtio device

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-111-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.5.0, File-System: ext4, System Layer: KVM


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 7.27198 |=========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 10548.28 |========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 3813.48 |=========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 313.69 |==========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 313.13 |==========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 10039.90 |========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 23789.35 |========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 19814.46 |========================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 6114.14 |=========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 79.03 |===========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 3.53502 |=========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 25.53 |===========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 1.39930 |=========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 5.21778 |=========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 0.03861 |=========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 0.32768 |=========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 3.31949 |=========================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 12190.62 |========================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 1581.66 |=========================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 243.11 |==========================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 35.97 |===========================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Streamcluster
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 27.65 |===========================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 3855017.30 |======================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 6902.85 |=========================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec < Lower Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 132.82 |==========================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 5155.35 |=========================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 5625.60 |=========================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec < Lower Is Better
optimized-flavor-and-image . 107.60 |==========================================