Core i5 10600K X Intel Core i5-10600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS) and ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Core i5 10600K: Processor: Intel Core i5-10600K @ 4.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Round 2: Processor: Intel Core i5-10600K @ 4.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 58.21 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 58.16 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 23.94 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 23.91 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 93.28 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 93.43 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 24.01 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 24.01 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 551.73 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 552.99 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 144.38 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 143.95 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 498.75 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 499.37 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 102.86 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 102.86 |====================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13.04 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 13.12 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.15 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 2.15 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.15 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 1.15 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15.63 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 15.63 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.17 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 1.17 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.66 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 12.66 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.22 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 3.23 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 166.67 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 166.67 |====================================================== TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 415.70 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 415.24 |====================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.31 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 0.31 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.62 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 2.63 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.47 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 21.51 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.18 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 4.17 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 45.72 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 45.62 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.5552 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 8.5360 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9.6817 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 9.9218 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.08 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 10.01 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9.3215 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 9.4350 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.16 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 12.34 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 11.05 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 11.07 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.131 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 0.131 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.769 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 2.773 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.82 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 21.89 |======================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.4.1 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 40.20 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 40.38 |======================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 152.36 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 152.34 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 157.14 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 156.82 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 123.11 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 123.01 |====================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.83 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 7.83 |======================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.81 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 28.79 |======================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 74.86 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 74.71 |======================================================= x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 55.06 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 54.48 |====================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.86 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 6.88 |======================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 113.97 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 114.08 |====================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 24019599.92 |================================================= Round 2 ........ 24117316.08 |================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 51297524.66 |================================================ Round 2 ........ 51966117.86 |================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2380196.04 |================================================== Round 2 ........ 2378028.71 |================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 11253 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 11197 |======================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.058 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 1.056 |======================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.481 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 2.471 |======================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.26 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 1.25 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.37 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 1.37 |======================================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 43.93 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 43.93 |======================================================= LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 381 |========================================================= Round 2 ........ 368 |======================================================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9383986 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 9383032 |===================================================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1024000 |==================================== Round 2 ........ 1522342 |===================================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19976689 |==================================================== Round 2 ........ 19719506 |=================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 22469622 |==================================================== Round 2 ........ 22384013 |==================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1099 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 1102 |======================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1126 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 1130 |======================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2225 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 2232 |======================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 850.74 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 847.33 |====================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 32473.37 |==================================================== Round 2 ........ 32449.58 |==================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1234.91 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 1234.75 |===================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 201 |========================================================= Round 2 ........ 201 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 265 |========================================================= Round 2 ........ 265 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 85.6 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 85.6 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 88.5 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 88.6 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 98.6 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 98.8 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15.2 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 15.2 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 373 |========================================================= Round 2 ........ 373 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19.3 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 19.4 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 88.8 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 88.9 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 140 |========================================================= Round 2 ........ 141 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.63 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 6.65 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 40.1 |======================================================== Round 2 ........ 40.2 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 345 |========================================================= Round 2 ........ 344 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1431.16 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 1412.51 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1480.70 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 1467.41 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1840.47 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 1824.26 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 663.02 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 577.91 |=============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 16055.85 |==================================================== Round 2 ........ 16032.38 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3310.90 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 3177.82 |=================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1894.63 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 1864.34 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2455.26 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 2447.34 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8047.05 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 7932.54 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1280.06 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 1282.88 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.30207 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 4.34217 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 65.31 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 65.25 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.02694 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 2.03130 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.19 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 28.21 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15.36 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 15.39 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.27087 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 5.31585 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.36266 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 8.37158 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13.98 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 13.99 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.95186 |==================================================== Round 2 ........ 6.02480 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.00137 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 4.00579 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 355.47 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 357.58 |====================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 143.88 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 143.89 |====================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.44955 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 3.45954 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.74019 |==================================================== Round 2 ........ 2.77431 |===================================================== WireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Test Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 156.12 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 158.30 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 305.11 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 304.18 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 93.12 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 93.44 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 131.81 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 131.13 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.08 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 28.09 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18.04 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 18.03 |======================================================= Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 196.89 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 189.18 |==================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 106.91 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 105.50 |===================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 63.48 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 63.41 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.417 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 5.400 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.055 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 5.084 |======================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 105.83 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 106.02 |====================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 94.65 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 94.58 |======================================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 59.54 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 59.47 |======================================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 14.04 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 14.09 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35.87 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 35.77 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 30.01 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 29.96 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.95105 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 8.90638 |===================================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.21 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 12.20 |======================================================= YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 196.07 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 195.54 |====================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 314.10 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 314.41 |====================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 196.61 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 197.10 |====================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 4 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 237.52 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 237.83 |====================================================== Open Porous Media OPM Benchmark: Flow MPI Norne - Threads: 6 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 304.84 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 305.36 |====================================================== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.91 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 29.04 |======================================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.226 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 4.257 |======================================================= m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 108.18 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 108.17 |====================================================== N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18.77 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 18.78 |======================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 613.73 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 612.12 |====================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 192.06 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 197.36 |====================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 118.53 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 118.65 |====================================================== OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 29.19 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 29.24 |======================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 208.51 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 207.64 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 617.80 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 616.05 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 326.98 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 326.69 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 865.93 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 865.98 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 788.98 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 783.81 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 512.46 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 513.38 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 303.65 |===================================================== Round 2 ........ 308.32 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 283.15 |====================================================== Round 2 ........ 282.80 |====================================================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 20.39 |======================================================= Round 2 ........ 20.40 |=======================================================