hpc-run-1
KVM testing on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


optimized.v1.xlarge: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Core (Broadwell) (30 Cores), Motherboard: RDO OpenStack Compute (1.11.0-2.el7 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9, Memory: 100GB, Disk: 21GB QEMU HDD + 365GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Red Hat Virtio GPU, Network: Red Hat Virtio device

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-111-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.5.0, File-System: ext4, System Layer: KVM

optimized.vm.xlarge: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Core (Broadwell) (30 Cores), Motherboard: RDO OpenStack Compute (1.11.0-2.el7 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 82G33/G31/P35/P31 + ICH9, Memory: 100GB, Disk: 21GB QEMU HDD + 365GB QEMU HDD, Graphics: Red Hat Virtio GPU, Network: Red Hat Virtio device

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-111-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 7.5.0, File-System: ext4, System Layer: KVM


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 16.32 |==================================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 16.31 |==================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 52854.17 |===============================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 52891.94 |===============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 1180.31 |================================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 1137.29 |==============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 1182.31 |================================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 1177.90 |================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 18375.88 |===============================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 18151.56 |==============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 69523.79 |===============================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 69684.82 |===============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 37114.36 |===============================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 36875.38 |===============================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.v1.xlarge . 30909.75 |===============================================
optimized.vm.xlarge . 30770.19 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 123.58 |=================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 6.32367 |================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 22.77 |==================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 6.34966 |================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 3.21699 |================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 0.08061 |================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 0.61320 |================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 1.40170 |================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 12056.52 |===============================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 431.92 |=================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 107.43 |=================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 12.80 |==================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Streamcluster
Seconds < Lower Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 17.99 |==================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 10016813.84 |============================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 3655.83 |================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec < Lower Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 387.07 |=================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 3962.46 |================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 2633.68 |================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec < Lower Is Better
optimized.vm.xlarge . 221.30 |=================================================