phoronix-hpc-test
2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6130 testing with a GIGABYTE MR91-FS0-Y9 v01000100 (R11 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 18.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


first run: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Gold 6130 @ 3.70GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MR91-FS0-Y9 v01000100 (R11 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 1000GB Seagate ST1000NX0313, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: HP W2371b, Network: 2 x Intel I350

	OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-111-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.28.4, Display Server: X Server 1.19.6, Display Driver: modesetting 1.19.6, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.2.8 (LLVM 9.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 7.5.0 + CUDA 10.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2161


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 21.73 |============================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 57552.55 |=========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 23679.42 |=========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 1298.23 |==========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 1291.91 |==========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 37698.96 |=========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: IS.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 1650.36 |==========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 75979.59 |=========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 51488.19 |=========================================================


NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 35782.42 |=========================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
first run . 193.01 |===========================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
first run . 15.38 |============================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
first run . 22.85 |============================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 3.39589 |==========================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 4.27287 |==========================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 0.04572 |==========================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
first run . 0.87068 |==========================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 1.21774 |==========================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
first run . 15735.23 |=========================================================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP LBM
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 24.72 |============================================================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP CUTCP
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 2.065188 |=========================================================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP Stencil
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 4.377602 |=========================================================


Parboil 2.5
Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 335.86 |===========================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP LavaMD
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 264.80 |===========================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Leukocyte
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 81.17 |============================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP CFD Solver
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 11.53 |============================================================


Rodinia 3.1
Test: OpenMP Streamcluster
Seconds < Lower Is Better
first run . 12.89 |============================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
first run . 17258118.52 |======================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
first run . 5350.34 |==========================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec < Lower Is Better
first run . 192.17 |===========================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
first run . 3366.39 |==========================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
first run . 3490.30 |==========================================================


Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec < Lower Is Better
first run . 112.08 |===========================================================