compiletest

Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a EVGA 121-KS-E375 v1.0 (1.09 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB on Gentoo 2.7 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2007134-NE-2007128NI36
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
foo
July 12 2020
  1 Minute
9900K-50x50x47-4133C16
July 13 2020
  21 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  11 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


compiletestProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkMonitorOSKernelDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionVulkanfoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C16Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)MSI Z270I GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7A66) v1.0 (1.40 BIOS)Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z27032GB1000GB Western Digital WDS100T3X0C-00SJG0 + 2048GB Micron_1100_MTFD + 2000GB Seagate ST2000LX001-1RG1NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB (1480/5508MHz)Realtek ALC1220Intel I219-V + Intel 8265 / 8275Arch rolling5.7.7-arch1-1 (x86_64)X Server 1.20.8NVIDIA 440.1004.6.0OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 10.2.185GCC 10.1.0 + Clang 10.0.0 + LLVM 10.0.0 + CUDA 10.2ext44880x2560Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)EVGA 121-KS-E375 v1.0 (1.09 BIOS)Intel 8th Gen Core 8-core Desktop16GBSamsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB + 256GB PLEXTOR PX-256M6 + 240GB KINGSTON SH103S3 + 2000GB Western Digital WD2003FZEX-0 + 2000GB Samsung SSD 860ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GBNVIDIA GP102 HDMI AudioXB271HUIntel I219-VGentoo 2.75.4.37-ck (x86_64)1.2.133reiserfsOpenBenchmarking.orgDisk Details- foo: NONE / relatime,rw- 9900K-50x50x47-4133C16: NONE / noatime,notail,rw,user_xattrProcessor Details- foo: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xd6- 9900K-50x50x47-4133C16: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate performance - CPU Microcode: 0x98Python Details- foo: Python 3.8.3- 9900K-50x50x47-4133C16: Python 3.7.8Security Details- foo: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Mitigation of PTE Inversion; VMX: conditional cache flushes SMT vulnerable + mds: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Mitigation of PTI + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Mitigation of Microcode + tsx_async_abort: Mitigation of Clear buffers; SMT vulnerable - 9900K-50x50x47-4133C16: itlb_multihit: KVM: Vulnerable + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Vulnerable: Clear buffers attempted no microcode; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full generic retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: conditional RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Vulnerable: Clear buffers attempted no microcode; SMT vulnerable

foo vs. 9900K-50x50x47-4133C16 ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+79.7%+79.7%+159.4%+159.4%+239.1%+239.1%32.6%Compile318.8%Initial Create130.7%Read Compiled TreeCompile BenchCompile BenchCompile Benchfoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C16

Compile Bench

Compilebench tries to age a filesystem by simulating some of the disk IO common in creating, compiling, patching, stating and reading kernel trees. It indirectly measures how well filesystems can maintain directory locality as the disk fills up and directories age. This current test is setup to use the makej mode with 10 initial directories Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Compilefoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C165001000150020002500SE +/- 24.64, N = 3SE +/- 32.26, N = 152191.49523.29
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Compilefoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C16400800120016002000Min: 2142.32 / Avg: 2191.49 / Max: 2218.88Min: 317.38 / Avg: 523.29 / Max: 723.75

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial Createfoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C16110220330440550SE +/- 3.67, N = 3SE +/- 4.94, N = 3512.67222.25
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Initial Createfoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C1690180270360450Min: 505.45 / Avg: 512.67 / Max: 517.48Min: 215.25 / Avg: 222.25 / Max: 231.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled Treefoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C168001600240032004000SE +/- 18.69, N = 3SE +/- 476.58, N = 32945.303906.70
OpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCompile Bench 0.6Test: Read Compiled Treefoo9900K-50x50x47-4133C167001400210028003500Min: 2912.93 / Avg: 2945.3 / Max: 2977.66Min: 3424.62 / Avg: 3906.7 / Max: 4859.84