Core i5 10600K

Intel Core i5-10600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS) and i915drmfb on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2007123-NE-COREI510648
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Core i5 10600K
July 10 2020
  1 Day, 5 Hours, 37 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Core i5 10600K Intel Core i5-10600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS) and i915drmfb on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Core i5 10600K: Processor: Intel Core i5-10600K @ 4.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB, Graphics: i915drmfb (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 103123 |====================================================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 20.56 |======================================================= Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.74 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.68 |======================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 22.57 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 69.70 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 64.12 |======================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 43.57 |======================================================= AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2225 |======================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1128 |======================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1097 |======================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 282.27 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 306.87 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 514.74 |====================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 34384.70 |==================================================== NeatBench 5 FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13.5 |======================================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 47926.64 |==================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 43.62 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 144.48 |====================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.79 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 25.74 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 690.64 |====================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 351 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 40.2 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.64 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 141 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 87.3 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19.4 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 374 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 96.1 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 88.6 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 84.8 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 267 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 198 |========================================================= PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 805 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.0 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 93812.5 |===================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.0 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 159540.5 |==================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 786.60 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 864.05 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 326.34 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 614.96 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 207.83 |====================================================== IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.472 |======================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.055 |======================================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 11236 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.48 |======================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.97 |======================================================= librsvg Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 17.71 |======================================================= RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 61.64 |======================================================= GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.193 |======================================================= OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 29.08 |======================================================= LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.386 |======================================================= Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 20.74 |======================================================= Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 44.49 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 58.70 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 17.30 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 88.89 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.77 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.92 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.67 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.720 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35.39 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 53.03 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 55.36 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 26.11 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 34.54 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 27.23 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 83.48 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.345 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.570 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.330 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.174 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.403 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.77 |======================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 50.43 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 29.54 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.07 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 75.82 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 950.71 |====================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 267.03 |====================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 27.06 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 51.69 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 631.62 |====================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 80.02 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 41.43 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.617 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 52.12 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8580.24 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 179073.30 |=================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1224.17 |===================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 31851.38 |==================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 850.31 |====================================================== GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.846 |======================================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average usec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 196.84 |====================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1601.22 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average usec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 277.81 |====================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2521.22 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-P2P PingPong Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5981483.33 |================================================== KeyDB 5.3.1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 800116.73 |=================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.836 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 31.06 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 42.7 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.752 |======================================================= libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 222.85 |====================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2066.6 |====================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 118.70 |====================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 194.03 |====================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 612.38 |====================================================== N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18.78 |======================================================= Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 70.34 |======================================================= m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 108.21 |====================================================== GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.736 |======================================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.254 |======================================================= Ogg Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.039 |======================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.414 |======================================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.608 |======================================================= DeepSpeech 0.6 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 64.93 |======================================================= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 34.08 |======================================================= Cython benchmark 0.27 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 37.70 |======================================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 31.63 |======================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.966913 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Prim Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.805187 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 136 Ragdolls Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.287345 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Convex Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.761886 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Stack Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.955223 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.450917 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Raytests Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.142622 |==================================================== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.94 |======================================================= Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 416.60 |====================================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 43.90 |======================================================= YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 195.57 |====================================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.23 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.95930 |===================================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 29.96 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35.93 |======================================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 14.08 |======================================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 59.44 |======================================================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 94.65 |======================================================= Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 134.11 |====================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 66.46 |======================================================= Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 48.43 |======================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 809.65 |====================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 106.23 |====================================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35.84 |======================================================= Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 111.12 |====================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1065.69 |===================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 71.10 |======================================================= Timed Clash Compilation Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 319.22 |====================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.70 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.072 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.401 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 63.40 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 106.41 |====================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21944355 |==================================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19693352 |==================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 42073 |======================================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4081.37 |===================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.36 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.24 |======================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2376187.07 |================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 51452531.13 |================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 24078479.22 |================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 113.72 |====================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.90 |======================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.321717 |==================================================== x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 54.48 |======================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 74.84 |======================================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.64 |======================================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.82 |======================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 122.78 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 155.86 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 151.08 |====================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.4.1 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 40.38 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.73 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.772 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.130 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.91 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.40 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9.2816 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.18 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9.8546 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.5724 |====================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 45.67 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.16 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.47 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 5 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.59 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.62 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.5 |========================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.31 |======================================================== TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 413.28 |====================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 166.67 |====================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.22 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.66 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.17 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15.83 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.15 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.15 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13.04 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 102.69 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 501.15 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 144.47 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 552.61 |====================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.74772 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.37733 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 131.45 |====================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 341.99 |====================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.00436 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.96565 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 14.04 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.32969 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.30389 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15.22 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.20 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.02798 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 64.45 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.31890 |===================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 956 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 189 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 752 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 150 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 97 |========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 931 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 300 |========================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 760320 |====================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12778 |======================================================= ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 699.13 |====================================================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1525728 |===================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9391172 |===================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 165.58 |====================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 522.84 |====================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 419.45 |====================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4594.94 |===================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 108.45 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1353.34 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1081.11 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 827.21 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 267.04 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 164.46 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 738.63 |====================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3507.26 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 601.85 |====================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1276.81 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7591.53 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1277.36 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7843.87 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2409.04 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1867.69 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 16194.06 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1817.66 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1512.54 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1423.04 |===================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4069 |======================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3721 |======================================================== Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 185.57 |====================================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.454 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 23.97 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 92.73 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 23.89 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 58.12 |======================================================= BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.95 |======================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 9Jan2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.300 |======================================================= Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.291 |======================================================= QMCPACK 3.8 Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 615.59 |====================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 68.92 |======================================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2535.45 |===================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2646.41 |===================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 25684 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 49943 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 53684 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18999 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6663.6 |====================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8820.1 |====================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10856 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9295.7 |====================================================== FFTE 6.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9951.01 |===================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 17798.79 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 38.29 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 41182.80 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 37.99 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 14948.01 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 37.96 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6670.41 |===================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 48.94 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13420.84 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 61.21 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35103.66 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.95 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 16512.50 |==================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Threads ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 143669 |====================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Tasks ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 143130 |====================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 144375 |====================================================== Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19.57 |======================================================= NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.07986 |===================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18.13 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.18 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 131.05 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 93.42 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 306.00 |====================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 562.70 |====================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.07 |======================================================== miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5657.73 |===================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 38.19 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 11.21 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.115845 |==================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 111.56 |====================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 374 |========================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6584.81 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10871.44 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 25088.31 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9742.45 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1012.29 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1009.68 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19463.07 |==================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.86672 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5768.70 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 369.77 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 713.97 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1841.45 |===================================================== C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10628.7 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2019.28 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3225.99 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 621.17 |====================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2794 |======================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 760.69 |====================================================== Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.527 |=======================================================