Core i5 10600K Intel Core i5-10600K testing with a ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS) and i915drmfb on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Core i5 10600K: Processor: Intel Core i5-10600K @ 4.80GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z490M-PLUS (1001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 500GB, Graphics: i915drmfb (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-40-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10628.7 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1841.45 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 713.97 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 369.77 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5768.70 |===================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.86672 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19463.07 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1009.68 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1012.29 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9742.45 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 25088.31 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10871.44 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6584.81 |===================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 374 |========================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 111.56 |====================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.115845 |==================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 11.21 |======================================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 38.19 |======================================================= miniFE 2.2 Problem Size: Small CG Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5657.73 |===================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.07 |======================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 562.70 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 306.00 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 93.42 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 131.05 |====================================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.18 |======================================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18.13 |======================================================= NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.07986 |===================================================== Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19.57 |======================================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 144375 |====================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Tasks ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 143130 |====================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Threads ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 143669 |====================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 16512.50 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.95 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35103.66 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 61.21 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13420.84 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 48.94 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6670.41 |===================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 37.96 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 14948.01 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 37.99 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 41182.80 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 38.29 |======================================================= Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 17798.79 |==================================================== FFTE 6.0 Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9951.01 |===================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9295.7 |====================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10856 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8820.1 |====================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6663.6 |====================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18999 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 53684 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 49943 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 25684 |======================================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2646.41 |===================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2535.45 |===================================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 68.92 |======================================================= QMCPACK 3.8 Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 615.59 |====================================================== Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.291 |======================================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392 Multiple Sequence Alignment Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.527 |======================================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 9Jan2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.300 |======================================================= LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 760.69 |====================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.95 |======================================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 58.12 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 23.89 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 92.73 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 23.97 |======================================================= Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.454 |======================================================= Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 185.57 |====================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2794 |======================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3721 |======================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4069 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1423.04 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1512.54 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1817.66 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 621.17 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 16194.06 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3225.99 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1867.69 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2409.04 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7843.87 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1277.36 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7591.53 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1276.81 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 601.85 |====================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3507.26 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 738.63 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 164.46 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 267.04 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 827.21 |====================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1081.11 |===================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1353.34 |===================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 108.45 |====================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4594.94 |===================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 419.45 |====================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 522.84 |====================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 165.58 |====================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9391172 |===================================================== TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1525728 |===================================================== ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 699.13 |====================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12778 |======================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 760320 |====================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 300 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 931 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 97 |========================================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 150 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 752 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 189 |========================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 956 |========================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.31890 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 64.45 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.02798 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.20 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15.22 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.30389 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.32969 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 14.04 |======================================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.96565 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.00436 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 341.99 |====================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 131.45 |====================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.37733 |===================================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.74772 |===================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 552.61 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 144.47 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 501.15 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 102.69 |====================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13.04 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.15 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.15 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15.83 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.17 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.66 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.22 |======================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 166.67 |====================================================== TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 413.28 |====================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.31 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.5 |========================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.62 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 5 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.59 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.47 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.16 |======================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 45.67 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.5724 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9.8546 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.18 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 9.2816 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.40 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.91 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.130 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.772 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.73 |======================================================= SVT-HEVC 1.4.1 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 40.38 |======================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 151.08 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 155.86 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 122.78 |====================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.82 |======================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.64 |======================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 74.84 |======================================================= x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 54.48 |======================================================= ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.321717 |==================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.90 |======================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 113.72 |====================================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkVdbVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 24078479.22 |================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkStructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 51452531.13 |================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmarkUnstructuredVolume Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2376187.07 |================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.24 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.36 |======================================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4081.37 |===================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 42073 |======================================================= Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19693352 |==================================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21944355 |==================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 106.41 |====================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 63.40 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.401 |======================================================= libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.072 |======================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 21.70 |======================================================= Timed Clash Compilation Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 319.22 |====================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 71.10 |======================================================= Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1065.69 |===================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 111.12 |====================================================== Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35.84 |======================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 106.23 |====================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 809.65 |====================================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 48.43 |======================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 66.46 |======================================================= Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 134.11 |====================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 94.65 |======================================================= POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 Trace Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 59.44 |======================================================= Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 14.08 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35.93 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 29.96 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.95930 |===================================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.23 |======================================================= YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 195.57 |====================================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 43.90 |======================================================= Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 416.60 |====================================================== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 28.94 |======================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Raytests Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.142622 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.450917 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Stack Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.955223 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Convex Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 3.761886 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 136 Ragdolls Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.287345 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Prim Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.805187 |==================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.966913 |==================================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 31.63 |======================================================= Cython benchmark 0.27 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 37.70 |======================================================= dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 34.08 |======================================================= DeepSpeech 0.6 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 64.93 |======================================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.608 |======================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.414 |======================================================= Ogg Encoding 1.3.3 WAV To Ogg Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.039 |======================================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.254 |======================================================= GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8.736 |======================================================= m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 108.21 |====================================================== Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 70.34 |======================================================= N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 18.78 |======================================================= Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 612.38 |====================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 194.03 |====================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 118.70 |====================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2066.6 |====================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 222.85 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.752 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 42.7 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 31.06 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.836 |======================================================= KeyDB 5.3.1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 800116.73 |=================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-P2P PingPong Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5981483.33 |================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2521.22 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average usec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 277.81 |====================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1601.22 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2019.28 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average usec < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 196.84 |====================================================== GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.846 |======================================================= Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: NDT Mapping Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 850.31 |====================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Points2Image Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 31851.38 |==================================================== Darmstadt Automotive Parallel Heterogeneous Suite Backend: OpenMP - Kernel: Euclidean Cluster Test Cases Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1224.17 |===================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 179073.30 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 8580.24 |===================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 52.12 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.617 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 41.43 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 80.02 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 631.62 |====================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 51.69 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 27.06 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 267.03 |====================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 950.71 |====================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 75.82 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.07 |======================================================= CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 29.54 |======================================================= SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 50.43 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Boat - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.77 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Masskrug - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.403 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Rack - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 0.174 |======================================================= Darktable 3.0.1 Test: Server Room - Acceleration: CPU-only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 4.330 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.570 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 5.345 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 83.48 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 27.23 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 34.54 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 26.11 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 55.36 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 53.03 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 35.39 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 7.720 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.67 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.92 |======================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.77 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 88.89 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 17.30 |======================================================= G'MIC Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 58.70 |======================================================= Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 44.49 |======================================================= Inkscape Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 20.74 |======================================================= LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.386 |======================================================= OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 29.08 |======================================================= GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.193 |======================================================= RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 61.64 |======================================================= librsvg Operation: SVG Files To PNG Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 17.71 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.97 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.48 |======================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 11236 |======================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1.055 |======================================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2.472 |======================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 207.83 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 614.96 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 326.34 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 864.05 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 786.60 |====================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.0 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 159540.5 |==================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.0 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 93812.5 |===================================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 805 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 198 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 267 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 84.8 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 88.6 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 96.1 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 15 |========================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 374 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 19.4 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 87.3 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 141 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.64 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 40.2 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 351 |========================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 690.64 |====================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 25.74 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 12.79 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 144.48 |====================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 43.62 |======================================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 47926.64 |==================================================== NeatBench 5 FPS > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 13.5 |======================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 34384.70 |==================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 514.74 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 306.87 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 282.27 |====================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1097 |======================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 1128 |======================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score Score > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 2225 |======================================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 43.57 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 64.12 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 69.70 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 22.57 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 6.68 |======================================================== Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 10.74 |======================================================= Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i5 10600K . 20.56 |======================================================= BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better Core i5 10600K . 103123 |======================================================