Paulls 75F22EPYC 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core testing with a Supermicro H11DSU-iN (2.1b BIOS) and llvmpipe 504GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSU-iN (2.1b BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 2 x 3841GB Micron_9200_MTFDHAL3T8TCT, Graphics: llvmpipe 504GB, Network: 4 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-39-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 188315.6 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 184946.9 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 195537.9 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 193801.4 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 121161.43 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 46663.14 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2798.05 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2821.16 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 76020.42 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2314.95 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 149930.03 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 101663.85 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 104682.91 |======================================== NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.55244 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 10123 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8591.4 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 10058.7 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8611.5 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7681.4 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8110.9 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8184.4 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8026.4 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7761.3 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7787.3 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8394.5 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8107.7 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7891.5 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7138.8 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 6892.9 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 5999.5 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 13831 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 19007 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 41125 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 41805 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 24198 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 35660 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 46631 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 41321 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 39557 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 38455 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 51617 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 53813 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 50907 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 39188 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 29569 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 17355 |============================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 40624001.0 |======================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1 |================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Register Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1 |================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1 |================================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.56899 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 15.03 |============================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.38049 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 11.54 |============================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.08823 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2.35919 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 3.55389 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 5.59919 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.98969 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.68778 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 406.12 |=========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 143.32 |=========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.549263 |========================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.916051 |========================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.117 |============================================ SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7.531 |============================================ SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 59.58 |============================================ Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 82936370 |========================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 220.70 |=========================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 16.49 |============================================ Y-Cruncher 0.7.8.9503 Calculating 500M Pi Digits Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 10.02 |============================================ OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 9124.7 |=========================================== GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 4.437 |============================================ Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2092018.77 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1718711.20 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1394811.13 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2015112.33 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1519964.76 |======================================= Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2185353.72 |======================================= Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 65236.39 |========================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 356.72 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 45.84 |============================================ Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 200.11 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 933.63 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 483.18 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 115.78 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 71.48 |============================================ Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 209.45 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 960.84 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 152.99 |=========================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1002 |============================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 23.85 |============================================ Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 198.81 |===========================================