EPYC 7572 again 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core testing with a Supermicro H11DSU-iN (2.1b BIOS) and llvmpipe 504GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSU-iN (2.1b BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 2 x 3841GB Micron_9200_MTFDHAL3T8TCT, Graphics: llvmpipe 504GB, Network: 4 x Intel I350 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-39-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 188965.1 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 187535.1 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 201925.7 |========================================= Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 198645.2 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 118641.43 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 45035.90 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2804.16 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2820.72 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 76311.27 |========================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2322.00 |========================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 149391.65 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 101748.74 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 107910.88 |======================================== NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.55141 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 10112 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8133.8 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 10132.6 |========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8638.1 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7667.3 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8166.9 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8242.8 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7999.9 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7777.5 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7795.1 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8389.1 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 8126.4 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7888.2 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7237.5 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 6298.6 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 5816.2 |=========================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 13905 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 18890 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 41325 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 41864 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 24196 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 35262 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 47190 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 41126 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 38668 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 38062 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 50863 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 53744 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 50727 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 38689 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 23527 |============================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 16718 |============================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 40571528.3 |======================================= BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Integer Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1 |================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Register Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1 |================================================ BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Floating-Point Arithmetic LPS > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1 |================================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.61525 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 16.17 |============================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.55677 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 11.68 |============================================ oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.08744 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2.48291 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 3.51112 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 4.61523 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2.01612 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.68715 |========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 387.56 |=========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 143.13 |=========================================== oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.563318 |========================================= oneDNN 1.5 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.905118 |========================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 0.117 |============================================ SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 7.601 |============================================ SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 60.23 |============================================ Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 82531491 |========================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 220.73 |=========================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 16.52 |============================================ Y-Cruncher 0.7.8.9503 Calculating 500M Pi Digits Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 10.00 |============================================ OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 9127.2 |=========================================== GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 4.458 |============================================ Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1820952.00 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1722705.42 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1381357.8 |======================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1823659.70 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1569169.37 |======================================= Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 2324848.42 |======================================= Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 65234.82 |========================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 354.54 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 45.78 |============================================ Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 208.39 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 934.25 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 481.97 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 115.80 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 71.29 |============================================ Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 209.03 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: OpenCL Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 957.25 |=========================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 152.28 |=========================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1010 |============================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core Score > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 32844 |============================================ Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1.46 |============================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 336.2 |============================================ Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Multi Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 889.4 |============================================ Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core Score > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 1179 |============================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core - Gaussian Blur Mpixels/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 73.7 |============================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core - Face Detection images/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 9.61 |============================================= Geekbench 5.0 Test: CPU Single Core - Horizon Detection Gpixels/sec > Higher Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 27.2 |============================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 25.69 |============================================ Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 x AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core . 198.64 |===========================================