Heavy IO Seagate FireCuda 520 AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Seagate FireCuda 520: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB + 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.8.0-050800daily20200626-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 4104.68 |=============================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 128 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 315 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 4531.92 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 5721.73 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 333.57 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 4057.01 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 104614.84 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 87310.71 |============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 5311.50 |=============================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 512 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 260 |=================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 256 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 264 |=================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 5877.18 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 170340.72 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 340.14 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 138125.62 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 7673.15 |=============================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 876704 |================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 785.36 |================================================ MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 1733 |================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 1774 |================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 64 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 1292 |================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 1683 |================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 4 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 1833 |================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 98 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 40514 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 97 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 40687 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 159 |=================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 24916 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 77 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 12866 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 74 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 13389 |================================================= MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 3009 |================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 7187.92 |=============================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 381824.86 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 354954.86 |============================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 31889.91 |============================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 4246 |================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 2832095 |=============================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 69249990 |============================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 222 |=================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 17893 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 79.76 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 33.3 |================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 174 |=================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 5692 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 71.12 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 28 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 221260 |================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 27 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 234341 |================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 106 |=================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 9325 |================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 96 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 10229 |================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 1190126 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 18.77 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 81 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 48590 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 10 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 94364 |================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 12 |==================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 78775 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 12.79 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 12.70 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 81.87 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 32.4 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 81.67 |================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 32.5 |================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 5368.18 |=============================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better Seagate FireCuda 520 . 0.5 |===================================================