74baseline 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 testing with a Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on CentOS 7.4.1708 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 74baseline: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 0 @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSC-C220-M3S (C220M3.3.0.3a.0.0315171956 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E5/Core, Memory: 8 x 16384 MB DDR3-1600MHz M393B2G70BH0-YK0, Disk: 2396GB MR9266-8i + 12 x 54GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC OS: CentOS 7.4.1708, Kernel: 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 506.39 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 15.82 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1984.01 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 57225.10 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1346.79 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 112367556.68 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 11860.36 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 244612.45 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 17.97 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 4002.98 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2862343.37 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 42374.51 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 44516.38 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 3257.32 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 11024.56 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 5531828.32 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 794468.88 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 150.23 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 8908290.59 |====================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1537274 |========================================================= BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 3878 |============================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 3899.9 |========================================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 9115.9 |========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 100 |============================================================= iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1000 |============================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 3200 |============================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 6400 |============================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 24257 |=========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 23419 |=========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 38736 |=========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1.05 |============================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 32934 |=========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 30322 |=========================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 33.6 |============================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 67.2 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1936631 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1763593 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1672351 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1365051 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1097652 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 733053 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1288395 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1286876 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1178103 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1043766 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 877238 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 587711 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 533912 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 527122 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 510376 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 478189 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 466454 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 398034 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1219743 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1274402 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1235341 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1060149 |========================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 933817 |========================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 641820 |========================================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2944.87 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2937.03 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2932.24 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2934.63 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2935.34 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 5061.97 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 5064.56 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 5063.51 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 5070.64 |========================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 5070.47 |========================================================= Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 52898 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 90785 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 21087 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 9046 |============================================================ Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1150406.57 |====================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 390552 |========================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1178686.67 |====================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 907695.65 |======================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 741875.85 |======================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1119625.75 |====================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 861810.04 |======================================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 16879.69 |======================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 20506.61 |======================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2240 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 14285 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 41029 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 51635 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 52124 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 52282 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 3169 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 27759 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 83504 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 114186 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 117890 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 41239 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 153160 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 114575 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 171339 |========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 109402 |========================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 108975 |========================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1630.0 |========================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2689 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 797.61 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 242.38 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 84.26 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1890.32 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 35.67 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 200598.42 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 341.66 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1285.44 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 169.48 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 836.88 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 10499.64 |======================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 56.70 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 250.35 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 147.64 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 2010.41 |========================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 208020.61 |======================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 379.21 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 1577.29 |========================================================= Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 74baseline . 11725.71 |======================================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 264 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 448 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 278 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 386 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 616 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 1222 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 2438 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 327 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 143 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 190 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 277 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 538 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 23 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 60 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 1107 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 129 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 289 |============================================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 26.56 |=========================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 9.337 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 4.483 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 4.851 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 12.10 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 16.68 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 4.170 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 31.18 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 4.424 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 8.290 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 15.28 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 29.35 |=========================================================== Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 56.85 |=========================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 124.82 |========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 2.649 |=========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 11.80 |=========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1090 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1276 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1258 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1216 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1255 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1347 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.0478 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.0481 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.0480 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.0491 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.0925 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.0494 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1073 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.0680 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1071 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1064 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1097 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1122 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1168 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1332 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1295 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1299 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1327 |========================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 0.1415 |========================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 74baseline . 4572 |============================================================