81mdatp VMware testing on CentOS 8.1.1911 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 81mdatp: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 (3 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB DRAM, Disk: 223GB Virtual disk + 140GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: CentOS 8.1.1911, Kernel: 4.18.0-147.3.1.el8_1.x86_64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.1 20190507, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1176x885, System Layer: VMware BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 58767 |============================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2421 |=============================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 380 |================================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 10951.5 |============================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 9614.9 |============================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 7779.00 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 7853.48 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 8066.78 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 8123.53 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 7953.05 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 7919.65 |============================================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 27.06 |============================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 9.722 |============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.0972 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.1005 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.0636 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.0565 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.0951 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.0935 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.1192 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.1217 |============================================================= Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 32.16 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 31.43 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 31.83 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 31.86 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 28978.22 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 47981.17 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 963.02 |============================================================= Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2047.89 |============================================================ Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 32899.78 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 34020.67 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 59916.46 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 99976.37 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1877.02 |============================================================ Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1726.74 |============================================================ Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 3822 |=============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 35212 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 5767 |=============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6593 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 100 |================================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1000 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 3193 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6394 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 31752 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 30269 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 44733 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1.05 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 39187 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 35072 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 33.5 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 67.2 |=============================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1614957 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1576275 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1511355 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1340354 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1089817 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 828991 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1500126 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1524178 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1483665 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1451584 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1203564 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 763618 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1316710 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1316122 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1284372 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1290407 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1140215 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 786604 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1092182 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1088576 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1068662 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1017157 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 917164 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 565996 |============================================================= ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 57986 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 20.16 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 37.91 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 72.74 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 145.29 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 20.82 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 287.75 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 37.38 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 73.37 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 138.59 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 290.02 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 537.98 |============================================================= OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 251.3 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.952 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 4525.97 |============================================================ LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 26.0 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 8.422 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 26.2 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 8.282 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.932 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 1.364 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 7.430 |============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 33.2 |=============================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 6.565 |============================================================== KeyDB 5.3.1 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 113178.27 |========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6334.68 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2052.49 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 438.84 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 5974.67 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 166.95 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 21973.54 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1326.45 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1557.60 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 381.05 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 10876.22 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 12277.62 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 202.21 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2129.83 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 430.16 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 13097.01 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 24337.05 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2343.09 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2752.95 |============================================================ SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 99.15 |============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Shared ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 32.6 |=============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 61.4 |=============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 31.1 |=============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutex ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 37.5 |=============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquire ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 24.2 |=============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amd ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 65.1 |=============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutex ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 26.0 |=============================================================== BenchmarkMutex Benchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlock ns < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 45.7 |=============================================================== Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1403559.22 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1258151.25 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1509281.24 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1194599.19 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1766750.46 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1366766.91 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 3.07 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 31.20 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 23.58 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 312123.69 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 284.32 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6423089.76 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 86346.06 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6237.94 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 16213.61 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2.19 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 490.31 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 135099.45 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6437.67 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 7481.17 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1354.54 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1638.24 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 658863.92 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 159245.06 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 18.61 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2033307.55 |========================================================= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 649 |================================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 4034 |=============================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 363297 |============================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 7684012 |============================================================ Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 415551 |============================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 1988 |=============================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 166055 |============================================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 5490.26 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 3345 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 297 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6136 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 651 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 4561 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 4501 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 5291 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 188 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6632 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 602 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 4533 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 3542 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 44649 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 22 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 45589 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 88 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 42711 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 375 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 5822 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 170 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 10190 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 392 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 14247 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 1121 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 42512 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 22 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 53068 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 76 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 5186 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 192 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 6820 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 584 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 50138 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 317 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 4459 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 3598 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 2146 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 464 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 3943 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 1013 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 5648 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 2835 |=============================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 8930.59 |============================================================ Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 3451.24 |============================================================ Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 3918.65 |============================================================ PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 81mdatp . 409544 |============================================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 0.606 |============================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 3.143 |============================================================== OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 195.66 |============================================================= OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 26.99 |============================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 371.14 |============================================================= OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 64.60 |============================================================== OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 123.30 |============================================================= Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 81mdatp . 330513 |=============================================================