78mdatp VMware testing on CentOS 7.8.2003 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 78mdatp: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 (3 Cores), Motherboard: Intel 440BX (6.00 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440BX/ZX/DX, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB DRAM, Disk: 223GB Virtual disk + 140GB Virtual disk, Graphics: VMware SVGA II, Network: VMware VMXNET3 OS: CentOS 7.8.2003, Kernel: 3.10.0-1127.10.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: xfs, Screen Resolution: 1176x885, System Layer: VMware BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 48208 |============================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2778 |=============================================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 371 |================================================================ Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6049.9 |============================================================= Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 9278.9 |============================================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6159.49 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6348.79 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6421.62 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5144.27 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5178.74 |============================================================ MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5072.50 |============================================================ t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 29.34 |============================================================== t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 9.787 |============================================================== pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.1256 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50% us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.1255 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.0570 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Reads us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.0565 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.1113 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.1097 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.1339 |============================================================= pmbench Concurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writes us - Average Page Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 0.1315 |============================================================= Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 24.20 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 24.06 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 32 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 24.60 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 64 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 24.32 |============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 32848.67 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 45412.67 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 960.51 |============================================================= Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2095.44 |============================================================ Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 34705.56 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 31985.17 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 44886.67 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 45459.33 |=========================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2018.66 |============================================================ Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1755.96 |============================================================ Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 236333 |============================================================= Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1763 |=============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 32 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5225 |=============================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 64 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 9373 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 100 |================================================================ iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1000 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 3200 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6400 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 31503 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 29628 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 45723 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1.05 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 38311 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 38124 |============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 33.6 |=============================================================== iPerf 3.7 Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 67.1 |=============================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1512125 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1475473 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1391946 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1271168 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1018629 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 780628 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1103602 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1087823 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1057282 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1218217 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 889089 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 596435 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1002581 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 991373 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 959467 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1003286 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 865544 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 612648 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1041677 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1017913 |============================================================ IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 956619 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 891159 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 761895 |============================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 560216 |============================================================= ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 51709 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 19.15 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 36.69 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 70.59 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 136.08 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 19.44 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 259.31 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 36.96 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 71.86 |============================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 136.19 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 260.92 |============================================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 521.76 |============================================================= OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 254.8 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6602.80 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1214.70 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 574.48 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 8623.84 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 372.70 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 21018.82 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1735.70 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Normal Load - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2829.48 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 869.93 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 10451.73 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 11305.50 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 380.56 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: On-Disk - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1978.06 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 908.85 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 12675.71 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 22656.63 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Mostly RAM - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2161.58 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 12.0 Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Heavy Contention - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2819.07 |============================================================ SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 117.95 |============================================================= Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1181219.98 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1469436.92 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1257990.32 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 992848.52 |========================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1499313.50 |========================================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1239253.25 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 3.07 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1.77 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 26.22 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 322305.11 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 207.39 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6402881.53 |========================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 85086.01 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 4642.36 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 22272.37 |=========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2.71 |=============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 484.07 |============================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 136389.83 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6460.64 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5339.30 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1677.38 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1612.26 |============================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 370705.44 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 107059.30 |========================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 18.58 |============================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 1974800.99 |========================================================= ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 618 |================================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 3714 |=============================================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5322.91 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 3633 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 274 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6021 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 663 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 4429 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 4521 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5147 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 193 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6225 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 641 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 4043 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 3975 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 43113 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 23 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 46653 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 85 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 45495 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 358 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5543 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 179 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 10279 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 393 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 14646 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 1091 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 50687 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 19 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 52903 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 76 |================================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5023 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 197 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 6611 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 604 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 51616 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Sequential Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 308 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 3916 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 4091 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2265 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 439 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 4095 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 976 |================================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 5722 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 2796 |=============================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 8755.35 |============================================================ Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 200 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2845.83 |============================================================ Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 2770.19 |============================================================ PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 78mdatp . 146913 |============================================================= PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 1.872 |============================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 9.182 |============================================================== Schbench Message Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4 usec, 99.9th Latency Percentile < Lower Is Better 78mdatp . 246340 |=============================================================