Xeon E5-2609 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 testing with a MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Xeon E5-2609 v4: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB CORSAIR FORCE LX, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 123.66 |===================================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 8.44 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1.06 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 115 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 23.0 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 412 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 262 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 58.5 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1.13 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 46.9 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 299 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 269 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 259 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 761 |======================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 586 |======================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 750946 |===================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1046 |======================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 506802 |===================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 18546724 |=================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 428821 |===================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 12721 |====================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 13477 |====================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 15872 |====================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4770 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2794986.70 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 47.55 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 192123.44 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 955179.26 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2763.98 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4728.86 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 17223.25 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 15985.74 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 584138.93 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1263.38 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 38677.34 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 20218.13 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 243874.91 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 29841532.47 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 730.09 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 108834.90 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 206.27 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 78.99 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 29.37 |====================================================== RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 151.33 |===================================================== GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 16.82 |====================================================== G'MIC Test: 3D Elevated Function In Random Colors, 100 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 158.23 |===================================================== G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 49.71 |====================================================== G'MIC Test: 2D Function Plotting, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 208.22 |===================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1909.71 |==================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 190.49 |===================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 99.11 |====================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 21.32 |====================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 138.31 |===================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 32 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 359 |======================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 16 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 398 |======================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 8 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 421 |======================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 4 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 443 |======================================================== MariaDB 10.5.2 Clients: 1 Queries Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 735 |======================================================== GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.456 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 83.30 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 10.6 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 82.54 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 7.919 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6.572 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 86.32 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 10.3 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 86.19 |====================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 10.3 |======================================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5699.48 |==================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync MB/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.2 |======================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6.532 |====================================================== YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 448.00 |===================================================== Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 308.02 |===================================================== Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1790.68 |==================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 250.37 |===================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2614.06 |==================================================== Timed Clash Compilation Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 845.30 |===================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 14.40 |====================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 15.31 |====================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 168.81 |===================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 286.50 |===================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 16785 |====================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.60 |======================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.54 |======================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 41.42 |====================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.53 |======================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 25.45 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 52.45 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 65.53 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 63.86 |====================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 7.551 |====================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1.038 |====================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.04 |======================================================= rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1.249 |====================================================== rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.533 |====================================================== rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.206 |====================================================== rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.060 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.3681 |===================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.8790 |===================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.7461 |===================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.0778 |===================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.6996 |===================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3.3001 |===================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 17.76 |====================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1.47 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 8.59 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.92 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.11 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 62.5 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1.24 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.97 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.47 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5.84 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.45 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 0.85 |======================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4.64 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 41.08 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 186.81 |===================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 62.74 |====================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 201.83 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 61.54 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 483.77 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 11.82 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 435.17 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 14.42 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 12.01 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 79.97 |====================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6.11580 |==================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 104.30 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 8.55524 |==================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1102.41 |==================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 202.38 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 398.89 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2897.00 |==================================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 25.5 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2281.2 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4833.11 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 12699.10 |=================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6833.23 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3464.94 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6926.72 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 43902.86 |=================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5025.91 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4358.82 |==================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3808.63 |==================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 8595 |======================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 9660 |======================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 10097 |====================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 6142 |======================================================= Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 521.72 |===================================================== Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 51.71 |====================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: Random Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 104038 |===================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 615 |======================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 650 |======================================================== C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4682.2 |===================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 8 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 52760 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 2 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 9203 |======================================================= Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 1 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4797 |======================================================= Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 3106.04 |==================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 75077.33 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 16 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 69280.44 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 2875.63 |==================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 1858.54 |==================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 71422.22 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 40864.89 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: UDP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 19044.00 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 8 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 65227.11 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 4 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 48134.89 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 27085.11 |=================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 16 Microseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 30.21 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 8 Microseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 30.17 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 4 Microseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 30.12 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 2 Microseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 30.04 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Latency - Threads: 1 Microseconds < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 30.13 |====================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 13038 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 5.33 |======================================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 4562.68 |==================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 16 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 28342 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: TCP - Test: Connections/s - Threads: 4 Connections/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 17195 |====================================================== Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 2 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 155760078967.84 |============================================ Ethr 2019-01-02 Server Address: localhost - Protocol: HTTP - Test: Bandwidth - Threads: 1 Mbits/sec > Higher Is Better Xeon E5-2609 v4 . 252151562752.15 |============================================