Sci Clear Linux
Intel Core i9-10900K testing with a Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB on Clear Linux OS 33250 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Core i9-10900K: 

	Processor: Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 06ef, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (2060/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Device 06f0

	OS: Clear Linux OS 33250, Kernel: 5.6.15-957.native (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: radeon 19.0.1, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.1.0-devel (LLVM 10.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.128, Compiler: GCC 10.1.1 20200529 releases/gcc-10.1.0-100-g49824d35e0 + Clang 10.0.0 + LLVM 10.0.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160


GROMACS 2020.1
Water Benchmark
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 0.972 |=================================================


LULESH 2.0.3

z/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 10.33 |=================================================


LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 9Jan2020
Model: Rhodopsin Protein
ns/day > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 8.635 |=================================================


NWChem 7.0
Input: C240 Buckyball
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 26631.8 |===============================================


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: leblancbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 2697.14 |===============================================


Pennant 1.0.1
Test: sedovbig
Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 2814.53 |===============================================


NAMD 2.13
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 1.19833 |===============================================


CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1
Fayalite-FIST Data
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 789.82 |================================================


CloverLeaf
Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 5.51 |==================================================


miniFE 2.2
Problem Size: Small
CG Mflops > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 4296.71 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 30774.68 |==============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth
GB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 1.55610 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: Random Ring Latency
usecs < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 0.26829 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Random Access
GUP/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 0.05749 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad
GB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 2.26946 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ptrans
GB/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 3.28533 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: EP-DGEMM
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 31.38 |=================================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-Ffte
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 6.20387 |===============================================


HPC Challenge 1.5.0
Test / Class: G-HPL
GFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 30.37 |=================================================


High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1

GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better
Intel Core i9-10900K . 4.38171 |===============================================