Core i9 9900K Java Python
Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Intel Core i9-9900K: 

	Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V

	OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-9-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.2.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191130, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: H2
msec < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 2468 |===================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Jython
msec < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 3299 |===================================================


DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1
Java Test: Tradesoap
msec < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 4110 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: go
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 195 |====================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: 2to3
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 268 |====================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: chaos
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 86.8 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: float
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 87.4 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: nbody
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 93.8 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pathlib
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 15.4 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: raytrace
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 376 |====================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: json_loads
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 20.3 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: crypto_pyaes
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 82.4 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: regex_compile
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 149 |====================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: python_startup
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 6.72 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: django_template
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 47.7 |===================================================


PyPerformance 1.0.0
Benchmark: pickle_pure_python
Milliseconds < Lower Is Better
Intel Core i9-9900K . 368 |====================================================