Core i9 9900K Java Python

Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2005287-NI-COREI999028
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Intel Core i9-9900K
May 28 2020
  37 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Core i9 9900K Java PythonOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteIntel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS)Intel Cannon Lake PCH16GB240GB Force MP510Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz)Realtek ALC892G237HLIntel I219-VUbuntu 20.045.4.0-9-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.34.1X Server 1.20.5modesetting 1.20.54.5 Mesa 19.2.4OpenCL 2.1GCC 9.2.1 20191130ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLOpenCLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionCore I9 9900K Java Python BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xca- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.5+10-post-Ubuntu-2ubuntu1)- Python 2.7.17 + Python 3.7.6- itlb_multihit: KVM: Vulnerable + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Vulnerable; SMT vulnerable + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Vulnerable + spectre_v1: Vulnerable: __user pointer sanitization and usercopy barriers only; no swapgs barriers + spectre_v2: Vulnerable IBPB: disabled STIBP: disabled + tsx_async_abort: Vulnerable

Core i9 9900K Java Pythondacapobench: H2dacapobench: Jythondacapobench: Tradesoappyperformance: gopyperformance: 2to3pyperformance: chaospyperformance: floatpyperformance: nbodypyperformance: pathlibpyperformance: raytracepyperformance: json_loadspyperformance: crypto_pyaespyperformance: regex_compilepyperformance: python_startuppyperformance: django_templatepyperformance: pickle_pure_pythonIntel Core i9-9900K24683299411019526886.887.493.815.437620.382.41496.7247.7368OpenBenchmarking.org

DaCapo Benchmark

This test runs the DaCapo Benchmarks written in Java and intended to test system/CPU performance. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: H2Intel Core i9-9900K5001000150020002500SE +/- 29.11, N = 62468

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: JythonIntel Core i9-9900K7001400210028003500SE +/- 33.81, N = 203299

OpenBenchmarking.orgmsec, Fewer Is BetterDaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1Java Test: TradesoapIntel Core i9-9900K90018002700360045004110

PyPerformance

PyPerformance is the reference Python performance benchmark suite. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: goIntel Core i9-9900K4080120160200195

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: 2to3Intel Core i9-9900K60120180240300268

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: chaosIntel Core i9-9900K20406080100SE +/- 0.03, N = 386.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: floatIntel Core i9-9900K20406080100SE +/- 0.09, N = 387.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: nbodyIntel Core i9-9900K20406080100SE +/- 0.09, N = 393.8

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: pathlibIntel Core i9-9900K48121620SE +/- 0.03, N = 315.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: raytraceIntel Core i9-9900K80160240320400376

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: json_loadsIntel Core i9-9900K510152025SE +/- 0.00, N = 320.3

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: crypto_pyaesIntel Core i9-9900K20406080100SE +/- 0.03, N = 382.4

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: regex_compileIntel Core i9-9900K306090120150149

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: python_startupIntel Core i9-9900K246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 36.72

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: django_templateIntel Core i9-9900K1122334455SE +/- 0.07, N = 347.7

OpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyPerformance 1.0.0Benchmark: pickle_pure_pythonIntel Core i9-9900K80160240320400SE +/- 0.33, N = 3368

16 Results Shown

DaCapo Benchmark:
  H2
  Jython
  Tradesoap
PyPerformance:
  go
  2to3
  chaos
  float
  nbody
  pathlib
  raytrace
  json_loads
  crypto_pyaes
  regex_compile
  python_startup
  django_template
  pickle_pure_python