Big Comparison Core i9 10900K vs. Ryzen 9 3950X Linux Benchmarks Tests fot a future article on Phoronix by Michael Larabel. Core i9 10900K: Processor: Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (2060/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Network: Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20200519, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 Ryzen 9 3950X: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (1201 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (2060/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20200519, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 495906 |=================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1373026 |===================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 855.40 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 324.19 |==================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 81.60 |====================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 202.90 |====================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1305.64 |===================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3246.42 |===================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: m7m kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 407.75 |========================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 838.57 |====================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.718560 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1.324664 |========================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_linearridgeregression Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.05 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.04 |============================ GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 529 |============================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1007 |======================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.03 |============================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 7.64 |======================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2875 |=============================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5148 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2677.73 |============================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4743.61 |===================================================== m-queens 1.2 Time To Solve Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 59.65 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 34.30 |================================ libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 135.37 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 78.41 |=============================== toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: TBB ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 79924 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 46547 |================================ toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Threads ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 79413 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 46331 |================================ toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: C++ Tasks ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 79172 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 46370 |================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1828.53 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1077.26 |=============================== OSBench Test: Create Processes us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.39 |================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 27.80 |======================================================= toyBrot Fractal Generator Implementation: OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 80088 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 47670 |================================= Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 18.28 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 10.91 |================================= Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5.124 |================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 8.578 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1791.93 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1070.70 |================================ C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 52.13 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 31.59 |================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2478 |================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4064 |======================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 22.76 |================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 37.15 |======================================================= Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Medium FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 304.94 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 187.04 |================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 256MB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 41.81 |================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 67.19 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5283.52 |================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 8390.19 |===================================================== FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.562 |=================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 7.197 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 94530.77 |================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 148736.74 |=================================================== Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 97.21 |================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 152.54 |====================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1460097 |================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2268105 |===================================================== IPC_benchmark Type: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1462821 |================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2260588 |===================================================== N-Queens 1.0 Elapsed Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 10.350 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6.760 |=================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 607 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 400 |====================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 44.60 |==================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 67.37 |======================================================= LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.19 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.29 |======================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7.852 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.237 |===================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 338.66 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 226.13 |==================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 426.20 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 285.86 |==================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Enhanced Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 269 |====================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 400 |========================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Hair Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 20.23 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 13.61 |===================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 14.45 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 21.35 |======================================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 31.25 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 21.19 |===================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.31 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 25.52 |======================================================= Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 2 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 46.17 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 67.81 |======================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 179.55 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 123.52 |===================================== Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.18 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11.82 |====================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3788204.92 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2609128.25 |================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3942561.25 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2716044.92 |================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.47 |======================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.56 |======================================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 34.85 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 24.18 |====================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Noise-Gaussian Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 317 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 455 |========================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 174.87 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 121.87 |====================================== NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 18.3 |======================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 26.2 |======================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 65.78 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 46.01 |====================================== Stockfish 9 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 35260191 |==================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 50373394 |==================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 46.51 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 32.61 |======================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Sharpen Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 175 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 248 |========================================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4322.00 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3052.12 |===================================== Zstd Compression 1.3.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 19 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 21.93 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 15.51 |======================================= IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1.894 |======================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.669 |======================================================= GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7.949 |====================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11.194 |====================================================== Rodinia 2.4 Test: OpenMP LavaMD Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 21.05 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 14.97 |======================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 299.75 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 213.49 |====================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Resizing Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1266 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1774 |======================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 68514144 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 95962407 |==================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 1GB Array, 256 Byte Stride, 4 Threads ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 50.13 |======================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 70.20 |======================================================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2866.6 |======================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4013.6 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4730.92 |====================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6620.82 |===================================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 29.27 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 20.97 |======================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1258.51 |====================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1752.90 |===================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2770462.50 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1992290.86 |==================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.30905 |====================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.58909 |===================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 65002 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 90026 |======================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 473.60 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 342.25 |======================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 505.43 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 365.64 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1249.40 |====================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1725.09 |===================================================== OSBench Test: Launch Programs us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 26.02 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 35.92 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 36.07 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 26.18 |======================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 517909.12 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 711755.16 |=================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3725.66 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2711.19 |======================================= Redis 5.0.5 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2289561.42 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1666744.78 |==================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1359.76 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 992.02 |======================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 61.71 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 45.11 |======================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5661607.84 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 7734523.74 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 8781.93 |====================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11945.15 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.34 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.89 |======================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 15.45 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 20.86 |======================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 114.39 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 84.77 |======================================== dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 700.92 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 519.76 |======================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.245 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.016 |======================================================= Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 510613895.04 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 380487205.37 |==================================== Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 188.10 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 251.43 |====================================================== YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 108.88 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 81.48 |======================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.029 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.711 |======================================================= Go Benchmarks Test: json Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3100011 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2321631 |======================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 8093.59 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6114.17 |======================================== rays1bench 2020-01-09 Large Scene mrays/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 81.82 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 108.20 |====================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25.17 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 19.05 |========================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.31 |========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.05 |======================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Google Chrome Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5.4 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.1 |=========================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25.31 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 19.22 |========================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 30.3 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 39.6 |======================================================== ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1142.24 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 874.05 |========================================= BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 192500 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 251130 |====================================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 229.3 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 176.2 |========================================== ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1161.18 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 892.67 |========================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 46.06 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 35.44 |========================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 39969419 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 51867171 |==================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27489 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 21239 |========================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 44.92 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 58.13 |======================================================= Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27066.00 |======================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 34951.11 |==================================================== NWChem 7.0 Input: C240 Buckyball Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 12612.4 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 9794.6 |========================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 49.01 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 38.24 |=========================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pickle_pure_python Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 331 |============================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 424 |========================================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1383667 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1771667 |===================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 36.69 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 46.89 |======================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 164.00 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 128.46 |========================================== IndigoBench 4.0.64 Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.435 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.660 |======================================================= Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 180.40 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 141.62 |========================================== Aircrack-ng 1.5.2 k/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 45911.89 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 58218.50 |==================================================== x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 126.49 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 159.92 |====================================================== GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.978 |============================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1.236 |======================================================= Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Volumetric Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.98866 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.53479 |========================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3755.9 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4707.4 |====================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: chaos Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 79.8 |============================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 100.0 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 735.61 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 587.62 |=========================================== IOR 3.2.1 Read Test MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 867.37 |========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1083.44 |===================================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 782.60 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 626.95 |=========================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: Random Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 231501 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 185500 |=========================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 62670.62 |========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 77933.94 |==================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2911882 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3615702 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1465.50 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1815.57 |===================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11.95 |============================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 14.78 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: float Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 82.5 |============================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 102.0 |======================================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: HWB Color Space Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1219 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1507 |======================================================== Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: High FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 59.64 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 73.68 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 343.45 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 278.32 |============================================ OSBench Test: Memory Allocations Ns Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 56.16 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 69.23 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 104.0 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 84.4 |============================================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1623785 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1320223 |=========================================== dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 671.39 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 547.69 |============================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: deep kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 12397 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 15150 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.56 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 21.43 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: go Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 187 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 228 |========================================================= LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11.9606470 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 9.8209433 |========================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Rotate Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 888 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 730 |=============================================== OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 192.83 |============================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 234.25 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.18 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 19.65 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Inception V3 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 9.23 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11.21 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: raytrace Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 352 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 427 |========================================================= DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 78.37 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 64.62 |============================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 19.28 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 23.31 |======================================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3319 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4010 |======================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 9184.57 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11096.64 |==================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 9.693 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11.692 |====================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: lbry kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 38917 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 46910 |======================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.09327881 |========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 0.11237626 |================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1.95 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1.62 |=============================================== ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1946.32 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1617.76 |============================================ PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: json_loads Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 18.3 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 22.0 |======================================================== Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 84.94 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 70.67 |============================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.57 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.49 |======================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: skein kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 45343 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 54471 |======================================================= Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25.03 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 20.86 |============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5.4 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.5 |================================================ John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 23257 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 27740 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.09 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 19.19 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 12.58 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 15.00 |======================================================= VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 30.43 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 25.53 |============================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2889 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3442 |======================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4925.38 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5865.13 |===================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Ping Pong usec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.222 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.835 |======================================================= Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 972233554 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 816912713 |=========================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.03768 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.55517 |============================================= Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.281 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.086 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: django_template Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 38.3 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 45.5 |======================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 51 |========================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 43 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 783 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 661 |================================================ GEGL Operation: Wavelet Blur Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 52.12 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 61.59 |======================================================= Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 431.03 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 364.90 |============================================== TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 706.62 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 834.38 |====================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1654.49 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1950.22 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.23525 |============================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.63474 |===================================================== ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1953.46 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1657.41 |============================================= GEGL Operation: Tile Glass Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 24.66 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 29.06 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 414.4 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 351.9 |=============================================== PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 760 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 894 |========================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: 2to3 Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 241 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 283 |========================================================= G'MIC Test: Plotting Isosurface Of A 3D Volume, 1000 Times Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.01 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 18.74 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Reflect Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25.42 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 29.72 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: crypto_pyaes Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 83.2 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 97.2 |======================================================== Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Non-Exponential Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5.14902 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.40751 |============================================= Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 294 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 252 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 36.73 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 42.85 |======================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: regex_compile Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 133 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 155 |========================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: sha256t kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 102523 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 119460 |====================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 908 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 780 |================================================= GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 32.37 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 37.64 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Antialias Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 32.11 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 37.30 |======================================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 556.52 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 479.25 |=============================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6377.63 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5494.25 |============================================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 132.44 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 114.24 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 26329.21 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 22727.17 |============================================= IPC_benchmark Type: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1260891 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1088654 |============================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 28.83 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 33.39 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 90.17 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 77.87 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 612 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 529 |================================================= dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 131.44 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 113.65 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.47 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 20.20 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: DenseNet 201 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.35 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.87 |======================================================== Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17312.0 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 14986.6 |============================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 77.06 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 88.76 |======================================================= x265 3.1.2 H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 72.38 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 62.85 |================================================ Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.56 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 14.39 |================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 131 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 114 |================================================== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27.17 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 31.13 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7.665 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6.695 |================================================ Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11.12 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 12.73 |======================================================= oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1.17466 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1.34228 |===================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 36212.48 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 31703.46 |============================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 115.38 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 101.03 |=============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1482 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1298 |================================================= GEGL Operation: Cartoon Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 78.94 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 89.86 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 258.92 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 227.80 |================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1776 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1563 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1148 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1304 |======================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 446.24 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 393.00 |================================================ oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 56.91 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 50.17 |================================================ Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 789.17 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 697.19 |================================================ Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.73 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 20.06 |======================================================= Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.91 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 20.24 |======================================================= Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4394.73 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4966.36 |===================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 23126.76 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 26109.85 |==================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 175.91 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 156.18 |================================================ ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2164.78 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1924.76 |=============================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: nbody Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 89.9 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 101.0 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 38776 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 34528 |================================================= ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1307.36 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1164.69 |=============================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 169.86 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 190.56 |====================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.66 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.16 |================================================== IOR 3.2.1 Write Test MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 249.66 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 279.04 |====================================================== Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 47.70 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 42.70 |================================================= GEGL Operation: Crop Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.764 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 7.538 |======================================================= Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 63.72 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 70.99 |======================================================= OSBench Test: Create Files us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 10.47 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11.63 |======================================================= Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1431900 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1292441 |================================================ Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 Scene: Water Caustic Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 23.69 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 21.39 |================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1930.39 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2134.31 |===================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.514 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 7.197 |======================================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 49.16 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 54.26 |======================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.87 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.27 |======================================================== Multichase Pointer Chaser Test: 4MB Array, 64 Byte Stride ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5.206 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.720 |================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_qda Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 62.50 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 68.93 |======================================================= Cython benchmark 0.27 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 35.06 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 38.66 |======================================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 185.20 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 204.01 |====================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 9.573 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 10.542 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Google Chrome Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 54153 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 49230 |================================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 55905.54 |=============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 61491.83 |==================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1961.58 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1784.00 |================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1884 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1714 |=================================================== Unigine Valley 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 176.70 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 160.95 |================================================= GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 50.06 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 54.91 |======================================================= IPC_benchmark Type: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096 Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1575932 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1445302 |================================================= GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.135 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6.689 |======================================================= oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_3d - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.76923 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.37431 |================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 41.52 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 45.23 |======================================================= Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_svm Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 20.91 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 19.21 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Score < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1387 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1509 |======================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 93.44 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 101.66 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 237.52 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 218.55 |================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.40 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 15.11 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 28.67 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 26.44 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 49.13 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 53.27 |======================================================= rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1.622 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1.497 |=================================================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Throughput Messages Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 639629 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 590729 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 615 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 568 |===================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.93 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.71 |==================================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 22.33 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 24.11 |======================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6969.1 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6457.7 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 149.13 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 138.23 |================================================== Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 13.97 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 12.96 |=================================================== NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1.20434 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1.11719 |================================================= PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: pathlib Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 14.4 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 15.5 |======================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 577.88 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 538.60 |================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 237.11 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 221.09 |================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7.699 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 8.250 |======================================================= Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 444.12 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 414.61 |================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 182.36 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 170.29 |================================================== rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.670 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 0.626 |=================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.13 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6.56 |======================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 290 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 271 |===================================================== PyPerformance 1.0.0 Benchmark: python_startup Milliseconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.04 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6.46 |======================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7302.38 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6834.75 |================================================== rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.460 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.241 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 102.08 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 95.65 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 104 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 111 |========================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11.62 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 12.37 |======================================================= Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Stack Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.810223 |================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.047731 |==================================================== rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.205 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 0.193 |==================================================== Scikit-Learn 0.22.1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 8.782 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 8.273 |==================================================== Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 41.96 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 39.56 |==================================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Quality: High - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 77.7 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 82.2 |======================================================== dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 177.43 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 187.35 |====================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 8.20 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 7.79 |===================================================== oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 28.02 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 26.62 |==================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.36353 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4.58602 |===================================================== Go Benchmarks Test: garbage Nanoseconds/Operation < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 788879 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 750702 |=================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3917.81 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4112.81 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 233 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 222 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 779.3 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 743.1 |==================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 407.91 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 389.04 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 104.00 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 99.34 |==================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 18.24 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 19.09 |======================================================= GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.822 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.042 |======================================================= oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: IP Batch All - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 19.02 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 19.89 |======================================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2003.91 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2094.16 |===================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 1000 Convex Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.584657 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.745295 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 39.99 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 41.78 |======================================================= Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 55.28 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 57.69 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 20.51 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 21.36 |======================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11106.03 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11557.65 |==================================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 113.6 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 118.2 |======================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1993.88 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2073.68 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11256.14 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 10835.78 |================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 136 Ragdolls Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.233182 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.150808 |================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.00066725 |================================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 0.00069115 |================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5.351115 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5.537606 |==================================================== C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 10910.3 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 11288.3 |===================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27.1 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 26.2 |====================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 318.78 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 308.68 |==================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 624.54 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 644.84 |====================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 63.28 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 65.30 |======================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6344.44 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6546.76 |===================================================== LibreOffice Test: 20 Documents To PDF Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.403 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6.605 |======================================================= AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.35 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 0.34 |====================================================== ctx_clock Context Switch Time Clocks < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 144 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 140 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 14181 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 13796 |====================================================== Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: Medium FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 404.07 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 415.32 |====================================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 165.15 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 160.96 |===================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 573.95 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 587.38 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 264 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 258 |======================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 130 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 133 |========================================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 532.27 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 544.39 |====================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 543 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 555 |========================================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1339.48 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1367.87 |===================================================== Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 716.26 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 731.03 |====================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3053.01 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3115.94 |===================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Raytests Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.043963 |=================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2.084161 |==================================================== Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 43.45 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 42.71 |====================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4227.75 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 4297.57 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 138 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 136 |======================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 42.18 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 42.79 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 715.7 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 725.2 |======================================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 398.10 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 393.31 |===================================================== Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Graphics Preset: High FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 81.93 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 80.95 |====================================================== Mlpack Benchmark Benchmark: scikit_ica Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 53.21 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 53.76 |======================================================= Unigine Heaven 4.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 160.18 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 158.58 |===================================================== RawTherapee Total Benchmark Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 53.31 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 52.81 |====================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Prim Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.782503 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 0.788758 |==================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 188.23 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 189.67 |====================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1961.62 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1976.57 |===================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 438.94 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 442.20 |====================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: Convex Trimesh Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.937118 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 0.943135 |==================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: Mobilenet - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.18 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 17.28 |======================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7.38 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 7.34 |======================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.25 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 378 |========================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 380 |========================================================= Xsbench 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2639580 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2653413 |===================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 35.73 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 35.90 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5033 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 5050 |======================================================== LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.974 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 6.954 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 37.6 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 37.7 |======================================================== Bullet Physics Engine 2.81 Test: 3000 Fall Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.359547 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3.367286 |==================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2779.91 |===================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2784.06 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 639.74 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 640.16 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1 |=========================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1 |=========================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.118 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 32.32 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha0_aes_avx2 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 46158.73 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 32.07 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17287.64 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 31.99 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7842.52 |===================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 41.07 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 15360.87 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 51.81 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 40764.97 |==================================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 24.55 |======================================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 18892.81 |==================================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Windowed - Quality: Ultra - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 34.3 |======================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 34.3 |======================================================== OSBench Test: Create Threads us Per Event < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 8.883476 |===================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 12.243907 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Google Chrome Overall Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1074.56 |========================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 1387.04 |===================================================== Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 231.54 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 161.79 |====================================== Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Firefox Overall Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 759.91 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 757.95 |====================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 656303 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 680458 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 230445.25 |================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 747139.32 |=================================================== Redis 5.0.5 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3071108.17 |================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2357409.70 |====================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.8.8.1 Algorithm: myr-gr kH/s - Hash Speed > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17627.00 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 9898.85 |============================= oneDNN MKL-DNN 1.3 Harness: Deconvolution Batch deconv_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 121.27 |====================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 69.59 |=============================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2968.39 |=========================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3622.03 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2894.89 |============================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3301.72 |===================================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 15777.24 |==================================================== Ryzen 9 3950X .. 10635.88 |=================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1704.12 |================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 2727.91 |===================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2615 |============================================ Ryzen 9 3950X .. 3293 |======================================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 83.73 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 51.13 |================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 54.94 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 31.27 |=============================== Sockperf 3.4 Test: Latency Under Load usec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.42 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 14.95 |=============================================== ET: Legacy 2.75 Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 288.5 |======================================================= Ryzen 9 3950X .. 255.8 |=================================================