epyc tests 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 testing with a GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS) and llvmpipe 377GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core: Processor: AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (64 Cores), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1006G BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 252GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe 252GB, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-31-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core: Processor: 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core @ 2.25GHz (128 Cores / 256 Threads), Motherboard: AMD DAYTONA_X (RDY1006G BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 504GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe 504GB, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Mellanox MT27710 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-31-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 @ 4.00GHz (56 Cores / 112 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MD61-SC2-00 v01000100 (T15 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 378GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe 377GB, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel X722 for 1GbE + 2 x QLogic FastLinQ QL41000 10/25/40/50GbE OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-31-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Scala Dotty ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 1765.81 |===================================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 1842.63 |======================================= 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 1836.06 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Random Forest ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 2186.72 |=================================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 2425.04 |======================================= 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2369.02 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 2385.07 |============================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 2475.57 |=============================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 3071.39 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark Bayes ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 262.27 |=================================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 297.72 |======================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 241.39 |================================ Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Savina Reactors.IO ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 14831.26 |======================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 23320.83 |===================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 23770.98 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark PageRank ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 3839.78 |=================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 4225.15 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 2864.74 |============================ 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 3991.27 |======================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 6787.06 |====================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 11763.13 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 16345.91 |====================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 16392.85 |====================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Genetic Algorithm Using Jenetics + Futures ms < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 2709.59 |================= 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 6367.01 |======================================= dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 550.51 |========================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 857.28 |======================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 409.82 |=================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 286.52 |================================= 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 345.62 |======================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 230.06 |=========================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 566.23 |========================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 856.64 |======================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 443.26 |===================== dav1d 0.7.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 114.31 |========================= 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 183.84 |======================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 85.77 |=================== GNU Octave Benchmark 5.2.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 8.366 |================================= 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 8.576 |================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 10.026 |======================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 9003.8 |======================================== 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 7035.0 |=============================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 3736.2 |================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core ........ 156.0 |========================================= 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core .... 128.3 |================================== 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 121.4 |================================ DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: H2 msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 9110 |========================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 4805 |========================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 12401 |========================================= DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradesoap msec < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 7011 |========================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 27486 |========================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 35 |============================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 104676 |======================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 52 |============================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 231698 |======================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 159 |=========================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 270122 |======================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 191 |=========================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 273682 |======================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 299 |=========================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 2100 |========================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 475 |=========================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 7728 |========================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Async Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8280 . 516 |===========================================