New Tests

Tests for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2005195-SYST-NEWTEST95
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Core i9 10900K
May 18 2020
  12 Hours, 46 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

New Tests, "Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark - ", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",23402.2,22881.81,22484.27 "Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Scene: Emily", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K", "Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Scene: Disney Material", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K", "Appleseed 2.0 Beta - Scene: Material Tester", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K", "Basis Universal 1.12 - Settings: ETC1S", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",42.277,42.22,42.169 "Basis Universal 1.12 - Settings: UASTC Level 0", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",6.438,6.45,6.435 "Basis Universal 1.12 - Settings: UASTC Level 2", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",25.166,25.148,25.153 "Basis Universal 1.12 - Settings: UASTC Level 3", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",46.412,46.469,46.406 "Basis Universal 1.12 - Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",573.352,575.379,574.354 "Blender 2.82 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",114.02,113.73,114.08 "Blender 2.82 - Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",334.96,336.95,337.6 "Blender 2.82 - Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",180.02,179.58,179.79 "Blender 2.82 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",475.13,475.26,475.23 "Blender 2.82 - Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",424.59,425.64,425.03 "BRL-CAD 7.30.8 - VGR Performance Metric", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K", "Build2 0.12 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",84.636,86.298,85.24 "C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 - Compressor: blosclz", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",10920.8,10938.5,10886.4 "Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 - Mode: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",19970,19678,19495 "CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 - Fayalite-FIST Data", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K", "Crypto++ 8.2 - Test: All Algorithms", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1959.729488,1960.126482,1961.849499 "Crypto++ 8.2 - Test: Keyed Algorithms", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",760.660053,760.663755,760.5257 "Crypto++ 8.2 - Test: Unkeyed Algorithms", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",393.016904,393.110034,393.293887 "Crypto++ 8.2 - Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",6148.831218,6143.244258,6137.1439 "dav1d 0.6.0 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",703.09002515435,702.08411226706,704.41839602149 "dav1d 0.6.0 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",178.29808106576,177.20585884354,176.81314058957 "dav1d 0.6.0 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",671.36099489796,671.47098639456,673.68327947846 "dav1d 0.6.0 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",130.11224954254,131.24866308326,131.80888609332 "DeepSpeech 0.6 - Acceleration: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",81.72689,79.15153,79.0264 "Embree 3.9.0 - Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",15.5502,15.4136,15.5086 "Embree 3.9.0 - Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",17.8653,17.7749,17.6296 "Embree 3.9.0 - Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",17.3724,17.5842,17.5994 "Embree 3.9.0 - Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",16.1416,16.1319,15.845 "Embree 3.9.0 - Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",20.3685,20.4756,20.2612 "Embree 3.9.0 - Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",18.2543,17.4957,18.1663 "FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 - WAV To FLAC", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",7.266,7.314,7.29,7.377,7.293 "GROMACS 2020.1 - Water Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",0.978,0.978,0.974 "Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 - Test: IMB-P2P PingPong", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",10922432.75,10906163.208333,10793063 "Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 - Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1896.3941666667,1899.1079166667,1881.8654166667 "Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 - Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",494.88666666667,495.34375,491.08791666667 "Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 - Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1511.2786956522,1508.3886956522,1529.7365217391 "Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 - Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1242.33,1251.9675,1267.8058333333 "Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 - Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",342.70791666667,333.53875,329.17083333333 "Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 - Scene: Memorial", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",11.131630416512,11.119512520571,11.116496436051 "Java Gradle Build - Gradle Build: Reactor", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",201.095,190.172,185.286,186.546,194.144,193.912,178,181.985,185.353,184.958,188.928,187.605 "LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 - WAV To MP3", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",6.989,6.977,6.959 "LULESH 2.0.3 - ", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",12.319477,11.672279,11.44027,12.3114,11.256581,11.798687,12.184246,11.973852,11.761988,11.519757,11.438731,11.501051,11.949044 "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: DLSC", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",2.1955172413793,2.2233333333333,2.2519672131148 "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",2.445,2.4748148148148,2.4692592592593 "NAMD 2.13 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1.20159,1.20857,1.2044 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: BT.C", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",26142.42,26105.29,26128.69 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.C", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1819.8,1719.09,1756.54 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.D", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1759.52,1766.88,1764.91 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: FT.C", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",11091.25,11107.55,11115.35 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: MG.C", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",11192.9,11164.25,11188.2 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: SP.B", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",5193.46,5194.91,5203.21 "Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 - ", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",14.41,14.281,14.278 "Nettle 3.5.1 - Test: aes256", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",8381.2233333333,8375.75,8376.6366666667 "Nettle 3.5.1 - Test: chacha", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1407.952,1405.894,1405.916 "Nettle 3.5.1 - Test: sha512", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",663.1,664.72,661.83 "Nettle 3.5.1 - Test: poly1305-aes", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",3856.64,3866.11,3868.77 "Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 - Detector: EXPoSE", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",619.575,618.969,624 "Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 - Detector: Relative Entropy", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",16.545,16.49,16.517 "Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 - Detector: Windowed Gaussian", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",7.547,7.62,7.533 "Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 - Detector: Earthgecko Skyline", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",95.954,90.697,92.229 "Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 - Detector: Bayesian Changepoint", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",35.949,34.114,34.317 "OpenVKL 0.9 - Benchmark: vklBenchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",193.58333333333,190.5,192.25 "QMCPACK 3.8 - ", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K", "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",27447.49,27430.93,27433.47 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",25357.62,25266.11,25273.76 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",25185.13,25179.75,25166.72 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",27258.2,27260.79,27233.78 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",26274.27,26263.91,26262.96 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",27374.13,27386.65,27389.61 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",25241.38,25201.2,25191.62 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",25333.51,25301.48,25306.54 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",27354.35,27359.61,27354.39 "RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 - Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",26279.49,26272.02,26216.42 "rav1e 0.3.0 - Speed: 1", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",0.205,0.204,0.203 "rav1e 0.3.0 - Speed: 5", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",0.668,0.671,0.669 "rav1e 0.3.0 - Speed: 6", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1.616,1.619,1.617 "rav1e 0.3.0 - Speed: 10", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",3.421,3.468,3.467 "Selenium - Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",36.79,36.13,36.72 "Selenium - Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",720.1,707.2,733.3 "Selenium - Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",38963,38792,38812 "Selenium - Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",291,286,287 "Selenium - Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",825.12,771.91,857.27,827.74,827.63,818.08,822.27,762.29,843.88,729.27,784.47,791.74 "Selenium - Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",235.05,237.56,236.93 "Selenium - Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",14504,13904,13345,14306,14005,14199 "Selenium - Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",386.27,306.64,273.81,186.77,175.15,338.14 "Selenium - Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",102,106,102 "Selenium - Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",103.669,107.096,102.265 "Selenium - Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",5.4,5.5,5.4 "Selenium - Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",107,104,105.3 "Selenium - Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1157,1138,1157 "Selenium - Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",27.3,27.3,27.1 "Selenium - Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Bitmap - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",60.4,60.26,60.15 "Selenium - Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Vector - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",60.5,60.59,60.49 "Selenium - Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Compute - Browser: Firefox", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",60.22,60.36,60.22 "Selenium - Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",415.6,414.3,414.7 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Copy", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",28388.9,28370.8,28365.3,28375.4,28392.5 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Scale", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",19009.2,19007.1,19003.7,19006,19007.1 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Triad", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",20439.3,20448.3,20440.5,20443.1,20445 "Stream 2013-01-17 - Type: Add", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",20664.4,20650,20649.8,20646.2,20652.9 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: MMAP", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",355.38,373.02,386.65,387.19,388.12,388.65,388.22,387.02,387.69 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: NUMA", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",317.41,323.39,327.51 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: MEMFD", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1230.47,1217.55,1228.74 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Atomic", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",272996.23,218195.24,214761.52,214988.94,214585.89,214406.03,214762.39,242261.77,242220.8,218222.53,248693.26,242353.25,214869.3,217974.21,258794.11 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Crypto", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",2675.48,2673.76,2678.86 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Malloc", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",71939506.15,71769973.92,71851839.63 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: RdRand", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",195279.36,195285.41,195291.59 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Forking", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",80336.58,83398.71,86282.67,81028.93,84803.58,82822.45 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: SENDFILE", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",225917.83,226270.85,226181.15 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: CPU Cache", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",22.5,22.5,22.97 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: CPU Stress", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",4718.76,4730.9,4727.45 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Semaphores", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1384104.65,1383973.75,1381297.73 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Matrix Math", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",64452.14,65883.09,63755.82 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Vector Math", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",94536.62,94530.93,94531.12 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Memory Copying", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",3505.47,3635.2,3342.02,3709.37,3633.8,3468,3372.59,3651.24,3499.93,3268.79,3639.01,3603.22,3460.56,3290.54,3628.04 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Socket Activity", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",8595.47,7433.65,7679.93,7513.78,7477.53,8310.04,8191.56,8277.25,7891.16,8119.04,8033.55,7990.2,8176.24,8011.65,8092.24 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Context Switching", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",5683271.37,5452696.69,5526343.48 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Glibc C String Functions", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",1841048.3,1838143.91,1873403.62 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",238.13,237.47,235.97 "Stress-NG 0.11.07 - Test: System V Message Passing", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",11896995.87,11903074.1,11891738.95 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",0.157,0.157,0.156 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",4.359,4.329,4.354 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",38.411,38.351,38.314 "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",200.94,208.12,208.33 "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",213.6,212.54,212.84 "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",184.84,185.76,185.3 "Tachyon 0.99b6 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",65.627,65.5617,65.8634 "Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",17.795,17.753,17.869 "Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",45.088,45.233,45.047 "Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",712.906,717.766,712.162 "Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",74.142,74.126,73.827 "Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",506.236,511.977,500.622 "Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",29.162,29.09,28.982 "Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",47.525,47.875,47.958 "x264 2019-12-17 - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",123.06,129.13,128.18 "YafaRay 3.4.1 - Total Time For Sample Scene", Lower Results Are Better "Core i9 10900K",109.873,109.378,109.337