Tests for a future article.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2005195-SYST-NEWTEST95
New Tests
Tests for a future article.
Core i9 10900K:
Processor: Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (2060/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20200517, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7 + Wayland, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.7, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160
BRL-CAD 7.30.8
VGR Performance Metric
VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 192636 |======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 414.9 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Compute - Browser: Firefox
fps > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 60.27 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Vector - Browser: Firefox
fps > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 60.53 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Bitmap - Browser: Firefox
fps > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 60.27 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 27.2 |========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox
Score < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1151 |========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox
Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 105.4 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 5.4 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 104.34 |======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox
Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 103 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 14044 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 236.51 |======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Firefox
Overall Score > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 805.14 |======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 288 |=========================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox
Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 38856 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 720.2 |=======================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox
ms < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 36.55 |=======================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Material Tester
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 166.67 |======================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Disney Material
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 176.11 |======================================================
Appleseed 2.0 Beta
Scene: Emily
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 300.03 |======================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Bayesian Changepoint
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 34.79 |=======================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Earthgecko Skyline
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 92.96 |=======================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Windowed Gaussian
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 7.567 |=======================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: Relative Entropy
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 16.52 |=======================================================
Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1
Detector: EXPoSE
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 620.85 |======================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 425.09 |======================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 475.21 |======================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 179.80 |======================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 336.50 |======================================================
Blender 2.82
Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 113.94 |======================================================
Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07
Mode: CPU
Ksamples > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 19714 |=======================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: System V Message Passing
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 11897269.64 |=================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 237.19 |======================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Glibc C String Functions
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1850865.28 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Context Switching
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 5554103.85 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Socket Activity
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 7986.22 |=====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Memory Copying
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 3513.85 |=====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Vector Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 94532.89 |====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Matrix Math
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 64697.02 |====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Semaphores
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1383125.38 |==================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: CPU Stress
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 4725.70 |=====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: CPU Cache
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 22.66 |=======================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: SENDFILE
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 226123.28 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Forking
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 83112.15 |====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: RdRand
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 195285.45 |===================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Malloc
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 71853773.23 |=================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Crypto
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 2676.03 |=====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: MEMFD
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1225.59 |=====================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: NUMA
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 322.77 |======================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: MMAP
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 382.44 |======================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 574.36 |======================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 46.43 |=======================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 2
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 25.16 |=======================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: UASTC Level 0
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 6.441 |=======================================================
Basis Universal 1.12
Settings: ETC1S
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 42.22 |=======================================================
GROMACS 2020.1
Water Benchmark
Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 0.977 |=======================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average usec < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 335.14 |======================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1254.03 |=====================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1516.47 |=====================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average usec < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 493.77 |======================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange
Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1892.46 |=====================================================
Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3
Test: IMB-P2P PingPong
Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 10873886.32 |=================================================
Tachyon 0.99b6
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 65.68 |=======================================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 6.975 |=======================================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 7.308 |=======================================================
DeepSpeech 0.6
Acceleration: CPU
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 79.97 |=======================================================
YafaRay 3.4.1
Total Time For Sample Scene
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 109.53 |======================================================
Build2 0.12
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 85.39 |=======================================================
Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 47.79 |=======================================================
Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 29.08 |=======================================================
Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 506.28 |======================================================
Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 74.03 |=======================================================
Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 714.28 |======================================================
Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 45.12 |=======================================================
Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 17.81 |=======================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.3
Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 2.46 |========================================================
LuxCoreRender 2.3
Scene: DLSC
M samples/sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 2.22 |========================================================
OpenVKL 0.9
Benchmark: vklBenchmark
Items / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 192.11 |======================================================
Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0
Scene: Memorial
Images / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 11.12 |=======================================================
x264 2019-12-17
H.264 Video Encoding
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 126.79 |======================================================
SVT-VP9 0.1
Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 185.30 |======================================================
SVT-VP9 0.1
Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 212.99 |======================================================
SVT-VP9 0.1
Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 205.80 |======================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 38.36 |=======================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 4.347 |=======================================================
SVT-AV1 0.8
Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 0.157 |=======================================================
rav1e 0.3.0
Speed: 10
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 3.452 |=======================================================
rav1e 0.3.0
Speed: 6
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1.617 |=======================================================
rav1e 0.3.0
Speed: 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 0.669 |=======================================================
rav1e 0.3.0
Speed: 1
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 0.204 |=======================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 17.97 |=======================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 20.37 |=======================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 16.04 |=======================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 17.52 |=======================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 17.76 |=======================================================
Embree 3.9.0
Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 15.49 |=======================================================
dav1d 0.6.0
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 131.06 |======================================================
dav1d 0.6.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 672.17 |======================================================
dav1d 0.6.0
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 177.44 |======================================================
dav1d 0.6.0
Video Input: Chimera 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 703.20 |======================================================
Nettle 3.5.1
Test: poly1305-aes
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 3863.84 |=====================================================
Nettle 3.5.1
Test: sha512
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 663.22 |======================================================
Nettle 3.5.1
Test: chacha
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1406.59 |=====================================================
Nettle 3.5.1
Test: aes256
Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 8377.87 |=====================================================
Java Gradle Build
Gradle Build: Reactor
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 188.17 |======================================================
LULESH 2.0.3
z/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 11.78 |=======================================================
QMCPACK 3.8
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 986.85 |======================================================
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark
Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 22922.76 |====================================================
Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 14.32 |=======================================================
NAMD 2.13
ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms
days/ns < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1.20485 |=====================================================
CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1
Fayalite-FIST Data
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 644.67 |======================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: SP.B
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 5197.19 |=====================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 11181.78 |====================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 11104.72 |====================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1763.77 |=====================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1765.14 |=====================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: BT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 26125.47 |====================================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 6143.07 |=====================================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Unkeyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 393.14 |======================================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Keyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 760.62 |======================================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: All Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 1960.57 |=====================================================
C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5
Compressor: blosclz
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 10915.2 |=====================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Add
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 20652.7 |=====================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Triad
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 20443.2 |=====================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Scale
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 19006.6 |=====================================================
Stream 2013-01-17
Type: Copy
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 28378.6 |=====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 26255.98 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 27356.12 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 25313.84 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 25211.40 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 27383.46 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 26267.05 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 27250.92 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 25177.20 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 25299.16 |====================================================
RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0
Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer
MB/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 27437.30 |====================================================
Selenium
Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 277.80 |======================================================
Stress-NG 0.11.07
Test: Atomic
Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better
Core i9 10900K . 230005.70 |===================================================