New Tests Tests for a future article. Core i9 10900K: Processor: Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO 250GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (2060/875MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Intel Device 15f3 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20200517, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7 + Wayland, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.7, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27437.30 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25299.16 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25177.20 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27250.92 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Integer MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 26267.05 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Add - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27383.46 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Copy - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25211.40 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Scale - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25313.84 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Triad - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27356.12 |==================================================== RAMspeed SMP 3.5.0 Type: Average - Benchmark: Floating Point MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 26255.98 |==================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 28378.6 |===================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 19006.6 |===================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 20443.2 |===================================================== Stream 2013-01-17 Type: Add MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 20652.7 |===================================================== C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 10915.2 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1960.57 |===================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 760.62 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 393.14 |====================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6143.07 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 26125.47 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1765.14 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1763.77 |===================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11104.72 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11181.78 |==================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5197.19 |===================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 6.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 644.67 |====================================================== NAMD 2.13 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1.20485 |===================================================== Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 14.32 |======================================================= Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 22922.76 |==================================================== QMCPACK 3.8 Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 986.85 |====================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11.78 |======================================================= Java Gradle Build Gradle Build: Reactor Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 188.17 |====================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: aes256 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 8377.87 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: chacha Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1406.59 |===================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: sha512 Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 663.22 |====================================================== Nettle 3.5.1 Test: poly1305-aes Mbyte/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3863.84 |===================================================== dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 703.20 |====================================================== dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 177.44 |====================================================== dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 672.17 |====================================================== dav1d 0.6.0 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 131.06 |====================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 15.49 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.76 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.52 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.04 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 20.37 |======================================================= Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Obj Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.97 |======================================================= rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.204 |======================================================= rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.669 |======================================================= rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1.617 |======================================================= rav1e 0.3.0 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3.452 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.157 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4.347 |======================================================= SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 38.36 |======================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 205.80 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 212.99 |====================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 185.30 |====================================================== x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 126.79 |====================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11.12 |======================================================= OpenVKL 0.9 Benchmark: vklBenchmark Items / Sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 192.11 |====================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: DLSC M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.22 |======================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.3 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism M samples/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2.46 |======================================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 17.81 |======================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 45.12 |======================================================= Timed GCC Compilation 9.3.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 714.28 |====================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 74.03 |======================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 506.28 |====================================================== Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 29.08 |======================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 47.79 |======================================================= Build2 0.12 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 85.39 |======================================================= YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 109.53 |====================================================== DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 79.97 |======================================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7.308 |======================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.975 |======================================================= Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 65.68 |======================================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-P2P PingPong Average Msg/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 10873886.32 |================================================= Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1892.46 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Exchange Average usec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 493.77 |====================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 PingPong Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1516.47 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average Mbytes/sec > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1254.03 |===================================================== Intel MPI Benchmarks 2019.3 Test: IMB-MPI1 Sendrecv Average usec < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 335.14 |====================================================== GROMACS 2020.1 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 0.977 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 42.22 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 6.441 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 25.16 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 46.43 |======================================================= Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 574.36 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MMAP Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 382.44 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: NUMA Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 322.77 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: MEMFD Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1225.59 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Atomic Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 230005.70 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 2676.03 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Malloc Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 71853773.23 |================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: RdRand Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 195285.45 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Forking Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 83112.15 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: SENDFILE Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 226123.28 |=================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 22.66 |======================================================= Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 4725.70 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Semaphores Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1383125.38 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Matrix Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 64697.02 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 94532.89 |==================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Memory Copying Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 3513.85 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Socket Activity Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7986.22 |===================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Context Switching Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5554103.85 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc C String Functions Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1850865.28 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sorting Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 237.19 |====================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: System V Message Passing Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 11897269.64 |================================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 19714 |======================================================= Blender 2.82 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 113.94 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 336.50 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 179.80 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 475.21 |====================================================== Blender 2.82 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 425.09 |====================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: EXPoSE Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 620.85 |====================================================== Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Relative Entropy Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 16.52 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Windowed Gaussian Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 7.567 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Earthgecko Skyline Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 92.96 |======================================================= Numenta Anomaly Benchmark 1.1 Detector: Bayesian Changepoint Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 34.79 |======================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 300.03 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Disney Material Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 176.11 |====================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 166.67 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 36.55 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 720.2 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Octane - Browser: Firefox Geometric Mean > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 38856 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: WebXPRT - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 288 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Basemark - Browser: Firefox Overall Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 805.14 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 236.51 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 14044 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 277.80 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 103 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 104.34 |====================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Maze Solver - Browser: Firefox Seconds < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 5.4 |========================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 105.4 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 1151 |======================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 27.2 |======================================================== Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Bitmap - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 60.27 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Vector - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 60.53 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: GUIMark3 HTML5 Compute - Browser: Firefox fps > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 60.27 |======================================================= Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better Core i9 10900K . 414.9 |======================================================= BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better Core i9 10900K . 192636 |======================================================