Icelake vs. AMD Renoir Graphics

AMD Ryzen 7 4700U tests against Ice Lake for a future article.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2005145-PTS-RENOIRGF57
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

Web Browsers 1 Tests
Desktop Graphics 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Disable Color Branding
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Additional Graphs

Show Perf Per Core/Thread Calculation Graphs Where Applicable
Show Perf Per Clock Calculation Graphs Where Applicable

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Core i7 1065G7
May 12 2020
  2 Hours, 6 Minutes
Ryzen 7 4700U
May 12 2020
  3 Hours, 29 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 48 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


Icelake vs. AMD Renoir GraphicsProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700UIntel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads)Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS)Intel Device 34ef16GBKBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBIntel Iris Plus G7 3GB (1100MHz)Realtek ALC289Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHzUbuntu 20.045.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20200511GNOME Shell 3.36.1X Server 1.20.8modesetting 1.20.84.6 Mesa 20.0.4GCC 9.3.0ext41920x1080AMD Ryzen 7 4700U @ 2.00GHz (8 Cores)LENOVO LNVNB161216 (DTCN18WWV1.04 BIOS)AMD Renoir Root Complex512GB SAMSUNG MZALQ512HALU-000L2AMD Renoir 512MB (1600/400MHz)AMD Device 1637Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX2004.6 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1)OpenBenchmarking.orgProcessor Details- Core i7 1065G7: Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0x78- Ryzen 7 4700U: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand - CPU Microcode: 0x8600102Java Details- OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.7+10-post-Ubuntu-3ubuntu1)Python Details- Python 3.8.2Security Details- Core i7 1065G7: itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of Split huge pages + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Not affected - Ryzen 7 4700U: itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional IBRS_FW STIBP: disabled RSB filling + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

Core i7 1065G7 vs. Ryzen 7 4700U ComparisonPhoronix Test SuiteBaseline+57.8%+57.8%+115.6%+115.6%+173.4%+173.4%231%230.4%223%197.3%197.2%47.5%47.5%33.7%26.7%22.9%21.4%19.9%16.5%12.7%12.6%4.9%Image RenderingA.R.TV.G.RWavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080Text Rendering68.1%Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGL1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Ultimate1920 x 1080 - UltraRenderer2 - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - HighMany Spheres - 1920 x 1080Many Spheres - 1920 x 10801920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - 4 - Cocoa Temple11.4%1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 4 - Cocoa Temple8.7%1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - 4 - Candela City7.5%1920 x 1080 - LowJava 2D MicrobenchmarkJava 2D MicrobenchmarkJava 2D MicrobenchmarkParaViewParaViewJava 2D MicrobenchmarkParaViewParaViewUnigine SuperpositionTesseractXonoticXonoticET: LegacyXonoticParaViewParaViewSuperTuxKartSuperTuxKartSuperTuxKartXonoticCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U

Icelake vs. AMD Renoir Graphicsetlegacy: Renderer2 - 1920 x 1080supertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 4 - Candela Citysupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - High - 4 - Cocoa Templesupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - 4 - Candela Citysupertuxkart: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - 4 - Cocoa Templetesseract: 1920 x 1080unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGLxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Lowxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Highxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultraxonotic: 1920 x 1080 - Ultimateparaview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080j2dbench: Text Renderingj2dbench: Image Renderingj2dbench: All Rendering Testsj2dbench: Vector Graphics Renderingselenium: CanvasMark - FirefoxCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U114.627.41761227.53976663.66402967.35488697.8791120.2269.0997266166.3315228136.5085529106.60420084.49450.38045.11721.72119.42202.33721653.2253196881805333.57736441394885.95486621288145.046481510506137.427.11476625.32835059.20067160.485523123.995527.0282.3998863193.8509860165.6879915130.96378665.06507.08466.531064.47257.72601.45812880.9063064275975599.19766864609035.40106604160397.392489710357OpenBenchmarking.org

ET: Legacy

ETLegacy is an open-source engine evolution of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory, a World War II era first person shooter that was released for free by Splash Damage using the id Tech 3 engine. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U306090120150SE +/- 1.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.63, N = 3114.6137.4
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterET: Legacy 2.75Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U306090120150Min: 113.4 / Avg: 114.6 / Max: 116.7Min: 136.1 / Avg: 137.37 / Max: 138

SuperTuxKart

This is a test of SuperTuxKart, an open-source racing game. The engine, Antarctica, is a highly modified version of Irrlicht and uses OpenGL 3.1+. Bullet is used for physics. Sound is provided by OpenAL. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U612182430SE +/- 0.46, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 627.4227.11
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U612182430Min: 26.51 / Avg: 27.42 / Max: 27.98Min: 25.96 / Avg: 27.11 / Max: 28.18

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U612182430SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 727.5425.33
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U612182430Min: 26.88 / Avg: 27.54 / Max: 27.9Min: 23.77 / Avg: 25.33 / Max: 25.83

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1428425670SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 363.6659.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela CityCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1224364860Min: 62.38 / Avg: 63.66 / Max: 64.32Min: 57.47 / Avg: 59.2 / Max: 60.51

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1530456075SE +/- 0.90, N = 3SE +/- 0.92, N = 367.3560.49
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterSuperTuxKart 0.9.3Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa TempleCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1326395265Min: 65.59 / Avg: 67.35 / Max: 68.53Min: 59.11 / Avg: 60.49 / Max: 62.22

Tesseract

Tesseract is a fork of Cube 2 Sauerbraten with numerous graphics and game-play improvements. Tesseract has been in development since 2012 while its first release happened in May of 2014. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U306090120150SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.82, N = 397.88124.00
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterTesseract 2014-05-12Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U20406080100Min: 97.48 / Avg: 97.88 / Max: 98.47Min: 122.39 / Avg: 124 / Max: 125.13

Unigine Superposition

This test calculates the average frame-rate within the Superposition demo for the Unigine engine, released in 2017. This engine is extremely demanding on the system's graphics card. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U612182430SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 320.227.0MAX: 25.9MAX: 35.1
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Superposition 1.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGLCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U612182430Min: 20.2 / Avg: 20.2 / Max: 20.2Min: 26.9 / Avg: 26.97 / Max: 27

Xonotic

This is a benchmark of Xonotic, which is a fork of the DarkPlaces-based Nexuiz game. Development began in March of 2010 on the Xonotic game. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U60120180240300SE +/- 0.41, N = 3SE +/- 3.81, N = 3269.10282.40MIN: 180 / MAX: 453MIN: 180 / MAX: 524
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: LowCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U50100150200250Min: 268.36 / Avg: 269.1 / Max: 269.78Min: 276.65 / Avg: 282.4 / Max: 289.6

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U4080120160200SE +/- 0.53, N = 3SE +/- 0.90, N = 3166.33193.85MIN: 101 / MAX: 276MIN: 126 / MAX: 313
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: HighCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U4080120160200Min: 165.77 / Avg: 166.33 / Max: 167.39Min: 192.58 / Avg: 193.85 / Max: 195.59

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U4080120160200SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.72, N = 3136.51165.69MIN: 78 / MAX: 245MIN: 101 / MAX: 256
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltraCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U306090120150Min: 136.22 / Avg: 136.51 / Max: 136.99Min: 164.42 / Avg: 165.69 / Max: 166.93

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U306090120150SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3106.60130.96MIN: 35 / MAX: 199MIN: 35 / MAX: 231
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: UltimateCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U20406080100Min: 106.12 / Avg: 106.6 / Max: 107.06Min: 130.23 / Avg: 130.96 / Max: 132.06

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1.13852.2773.41554.5545.6925SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 34.495.06
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U246810Min: 4.47 / Avg: 4.49 / Max: 4.51Min: 5.06 / Avg: 5.06 / Max: 5.06

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U110220330440550SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3450.38507.08
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U90180270360450Min: 448.45 / Avg: 450.38 / Max: 452.64Min: 506.94 / Avg: 507.08 / Max: 507.32

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1530456075SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.28, N = 345.1166.53
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1326395265Min: 44.5 / Avg: 45.11 / Max: 45.41Min: 65.97 / Avg: 66.53 / Max: 66.88

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U2004006008001000SE +/- 4.83, N = 3SE +/- 4.52, N = 3721.721064.47
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U2004006008001000Min: 712.06 / Avg: 721.72 / Max: 726.61Min: 1055.53 / Avg: 1064.47 / Max: 1070.11

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1326395265SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 319.4257.72
OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1122334455Min: 19.38 / Avg: 19.42 / Max: 19.46Min: 57.52 / Avg: 57.72 / Max: 57.94

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U130260390520650SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 1.28, N = 3202.34601.46
OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Core i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U110220330440550Min: 202.01 / Avg: 202.34 / Max: 202.78Min: 599.4 / Avg: 601.46 / Max: 603.8

Java 2D Microbenchmark

This test runs a series of microbenchmarks to check the performance of the OpenGL-based Java 2D pipeline and the underlying OpenGL drivers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Text RenderingCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 173.42, N = 4SE +/- 150.00, N = 2021653.2312880.91
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Text RenderingCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U4K8K12K16K20KMin: 21187.93 / Avg: 21653.23 / Max: 21950.71Min: 11553.71 / Avg: 12880.91 / Max: 13611.17

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1.3M2.6M3.9M5.2M6.5MSE +/- 1614.83, N = 4SE +/- 69455.85, N = 201805333.585975599.20
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Image RenderingCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1000K2000K3000K4000K5000KMin: 1803060.4 / Avg: 1805333.58 / Max: 1809960.07Min: 5420992.96 / Avg: 5975599.2 / Max: 6525799.26

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering TestsCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U1000K2000K3000K4000K5000KSE +/- 1383.63, N = 4SE +/- 33413.51, N = 41394885.954609035.40
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: All Rendering TestsCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U800K1600K2400K3200K4000KMin: 1391879.23 / Avg: 1394885.95 / Max: 1398532.23Min: 4535185.23 / Avg: 4609035.4 / Max: 4696814.95

OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U900K1800K2700K3600K4500KSE +/- 3640.91, N = 4SE +/- 1403.59, N = 41288145.054160397.39
OpenBenchmarking.orgUnits Per Second, More Is BetterJava 2D Microbenchmark 1.0Rendering Test: Vector Graphics RenderingCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U700K1400K2100K2800K3500KMin: 1279654.12 / Avg: 1288145.05 / Max: 1296121.36Min: 4158062.51 / Avg: 4160397.39 / Max: 4164057.4

Selenium

This test profile uses the Selenium WebDriver for running various browser benchmarks in different available web browsers. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 32.33, N = 3SE +/- 5.00, N = 210506103571. firefox 76.0
OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterSeleniumBenchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: FirefoxCore i7 1065G7Ryzen 7 4700U2K4K6K8K10KMin: 10466 / Avg: 10506 / Max: 10570Min: 10352 / Avg: 10357 / Max: 103621. firefox 76.0