Icelake Graphics
Intel Core i7-1065G7 testing with a Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS) and Intel Iris Plus G7 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


Core i7 1065G7: 

	Processor: Intel Core i7-1065G7 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 06CDVY (1.0.9 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 34ef, Memory: 16GB, Disk: KBG40ZPZ512G NVMe TOSHIBA 512GB, Graphics: Intel Iris Plus G7 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz

	OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-999-generic (x86_64) 20200511, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080


ET: Legacy 2.75
Renderer: Renderer2 - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 114.6 |=======================================================


SuperTuxKart 0.9.3
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 27.42 |=======================================================


SuperTuxKart 0.9.3
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: High - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 27.54 |=======================================================


SuperTuxKart 0.9.3
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Candela City
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 63.66 |=======================================================


SuperTuxKart 0.9.3
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Graphics Effects: Low - Karts: 4 - Scene: Cocoa Temple
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 67.35 |=======================================================


Tesseract 2014-05-12
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 97.88 |=======================================================


Unigine Superposition 1.0
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 20.2 |========================================================


Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Low
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 269.10 |======================================================


Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: High
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 166.33 |======================================================


Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultra
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 136.51 |======================================================


Xonotic 0.8.2
Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Effects Quality: Ultimate
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 106.60 |======================================================


ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 4.49 |========================================================


ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 450.38 |======================================================


ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 45.11 |=======================================================


ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 721.72 |======================================================


ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 19.42 |=======================================================


ParaView 5.4.1
Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080
MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 202.34 |======================================================


Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0
Rendering Test: Text Rendering
Units Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 21653.23 |====================================================


Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0
Rendering Test: Image Rendering
Units Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 1805333.58 |==================================================


Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0
Rendering Test: All Rendering Tests
Units Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 1394885.95 |==================================================


Java 2D Microbenchmark 1.0
Rendering Test: Vector Graphics Rendering
Units Per Second > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 1288145.05 |==================================================


Selenium
Benchmark: CanvasMark - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 10506 |=======================================================


Selenium
Benchmark: MotionMark - Browser: Firefox
Score > Higher Is Better
Core i7 1065G7 . 97.04 |=======================================================