Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2005094-KH-GAUSSFULL14
gauss_full
Gauss (Xeon D-1521, 64GB RAM, RAID 10)
Sampling of a few benchmarks:
Processor: Intel Xeon D-1521 @ 2.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: Supermicro X10SDV-4C-TLN2F v2.00, Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 1.96875 x 32768 MB DDR4-2400MT/s Samsung, Disk: 1919GB MR9271-4i, Graphics: ASPEED ASPEED Family, Network: Intel Connection X552/X557-AT
OS: Ubuntu 18.04, Kernel: 4.15.0-99-generic (x86_64), File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768
TSCP 1.81
AI Chess Performance
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 929113 |========================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: All Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 967.16 |========================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Keyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 359.86 |========================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Unkeyed Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 198.93 |========================================
Crypto++ 8.2
Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms
MiB/second > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3115.05 |=======================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 436.49 |========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 94.51 |=========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 140.01 |========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 463.44 |========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 593.63 |========================================
SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 890.29 |========================================
XZ Compression 5.2.4
Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 66.24 |=========================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Atol
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 100.97 |========================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Ctype
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 49.89 |=========================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Math Library
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 548.89 |========================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Random Numbers
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 1528.77 |=======================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Vector
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 117.03 |========================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Function Objects
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 21.68 |=========================================
CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9
Test: Stepanov Abstraction
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 45.25 |=========================================
FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2
WAV To FLAC
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 15.72 |=========================================
LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100
WAV To MP3
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 13.39 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5669.90 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5492.83 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5789.30 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4948.00 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4925.37 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4824.87 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4954.63 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4458.90 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4214.67 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4124.83 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4761.97 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4551.33 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 4454.43 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3758.97 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3499.13 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 3317.87 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 7940.73 |=======================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 11381 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18684 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 19100 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 12774 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 20387 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 27669 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18291 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18218 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 18978 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 30288 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 26598 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 24244 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 15586 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 13125 |=========================================
FFTW 3.3.6
Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096
Mflops > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 12517 |=========================================
Timed HMMer Search 2.3.2
Pfam Database Search
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 11.26 |=========================================
Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.392
Multiple Sequence Alignment
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 5.40 |==========================================
Himeno Benchmark 3.0
Poisson Pressure Solver
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 2586.78 |=======================================
Stockfish 9
Total Time
Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 7581375 |=======================================
7-Zip Compression 16.02
Compress Speed Test
MIPS > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 16173 |=========================================
AOBench
Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 56.12 |=========================================
Tachyon 0.99b6
Total Time
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 324.58 |========================================
C-Ray 1.1
Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 298.30 |========================================
Build2 0.12
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 288.69 |========================================
OpenSSL 1.1.1
RSA 4096-bit Performance
Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better
Sampling of a few benchmarks . 783.03 |========================================